Rebel5soul
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2024
- Posts
- 3,392
"Scientist's" implies more than one. We need a list.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The article only deals with two by name. The other is:"Scientist's" implies more than one. We need a list.
They're better than you. You do understand that, don't you?Trust me when I say, these blowhards aren’t going anywhere. They’ll never leave their ivory towers and cushy jobs, especially if the research money trough is still getting filled.
"Scientist's" doesn't imply more than one."Scientist's" implies more than one. We need a list.
What I posted says she is "a forest ecologist and also studies climate change, biogeochemistry and land management." That's a scientist, not a political activist hiding behind a degree.Do you actually read the shit you post?
Abramoff isn't a scientist, she's a fucking political activist hiding behind a degree. Fuck her and all her ken, the door really should hit them in the ass on their way out.
No reason they can't be both...most are.What I posted says she is "a forest ecologist and also studies climate change, biogeochemistry and land management." That's a scientist, not a political activist hiding behind a degree.
Most scientists are not political activists of any kind at all.No reason they can't be both...most are.
Most scientists are not political activists of any kind at all.
Except insofar as they always want more funding for scientific research, most scientists have no political agenda. Go to a university library sometime and look over the scientific journals -- does that stuff look political to you?You can lie to yourself with that bullshit but you're not lying to me.![]()
![]()
![]()
Except insofar as they always want more funding for scientific research, most scientists have no political agenda.
Go to a university library sometime and look over the scientific journals -- does that stuff look political to you?LMFAO!!! get the fuck out of here dude..........you gonna tell me Rachel Maddow and Joy Reid are super unbiased journalist too??
LOL lie to someone stupid enough to buy it buddy.
Go to a university library sometime and look over the scientific journals -- does that stuff look political to you?
You won't even find any politics in Scientific American.Quite a bit of it in modern times very much is.
To a near comical level....."scientist" is basically "woke bishop" at this point.
Whatever you gotta tell yourself bub......You won't even find any politics in Scientific American.
Have you ever even looked at Scientific American?!Whatever you gotta tell yourself bub......![]()
![]()
![]()
Not buying your bullshit isn't a war on science.This is not a new phenomenon. The Republican War on Science has been going on for many years now.
Anthropogenic climate change is real science. So is evolution. So is allopathic medicine,Not buying your bullshit isn't a war on science.
The war on science comes from you political activist.
Anthropogenic climate change is real science. So is evolution. So is allopathic medicine,
You're not even trying any more.No evolution is SEXIST MISOGGINIEZ and allopathic medicine is TRANSPHOBIC NAZISM!!!!
Why try? you guys do it for me LOLYou're not even trying any more.