Trump etc.

Most of those billionaires opposed Trump and we all know he isn't enriching himself as he works for only a dollar a year.
You love posting complete and utter BS don't you?

Soon as he was elected membership in his FL club increased 100%, to $200,000 per year. You don't think he's getting any of that income?

Trump Hotel in DC is charging above market rates for people who stay there (which is most) when they are coming to DC to meet with his administration. You don't think he's getting any of those profits?

Trump charges above market rates for all the secret service to stay at his properties when he's away from DC. You don't think he's getting any of that money?

And now it's just come out that his kids spent $32,000 of our dollars to travel to asia to rake in $15,000,000 for their projects there.
 
You love posting complete and utter BS don't you?

Soon as he was elected membership in his FL club increased 100%, to $200,000 per year. You don't think he's getting any of that income?

Trump Hotel in DC is charging above market rates for people who stay there (which is most) when they are coming to DC to meet with his administration. You don't think he's getting any of those profits?

Trump charges above market rates for all the secret service to stay at his properties when he's away from DC. You don't think he's getting any of that money?

And now it's just come out that his kids spent $32,000 of our dollars to travel to asia to rake in $15,000,000 for their projects there.

Please shut the fuck up with the phony concerns for spending taxpayer money. Democrats simply have no credibility in this area. From the Daily Caller:

"In 2013 alone, President Obama incurred $7,396,531 in flight expenses for his family vacations to Hawaii and Martha’s Vineyard, as well as a trip to California to appear on the Jay Leno show."

http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/05/the-obamas-have-spent-over-44351777-12-in-taxpayer-cash-on-travel/
 
Please shut the fuck up with the phony concerns for spending taxpayer money. Democrats simply have no credibility in this area. From the Daily Caller:

"In 2013 alone, President Obama incurred $7,396,531 in flight expenses for his family vacations to Hawaii and Martha’s Vineyard, as well as a trip to California to appear on the Jay Leno show."

http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/05/the-obamas-have-spent-over-44351777-12-in-taxpayer-cash-on-travel/

Next you should link the article about how much he spent for a trip to India. I'm sure you keep it bookmarked.
 
Please shut the fuck up with the phony concerns for spending taxpayer money.
So out of the whole quote proving the fallacy of your BS, your only take away is that Obama spent taxpayer money on vacations.
Tell us how much money he ended up pocketing as a result of those vacations? I mean, that's your point right? Certainly you wouldn't be trying to distract from yet another time one of your claims is utter BS, would you?

Democrats simply have no credibility in this area. From the Daily Caller:

"In 2013 alone, President Obama incurred $7,396,531 in flight expenses for his family vacations to Hawaii and Martha’s Vineyard, as well as a trip to California to appear on the Jay Leno show."

http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/05/the-obamas-have-spent-over-44351777-12-in-taxpayer-cash-on-travel/
Yup, that's a lot for vacations.

Of course, not as much as the $90,000,000 Donald (I-Won't-Have-Time-To-Play-Golf) Trump spent on golfing trips in the first 11 months of his presidency.
 
Lowering taxes is a good thing, but it has to be coupled with lowering spending. That hasn't happened and we are on track to run up the biggest deficit in history. He's given to the rich and expects the children of the poor to pay for it. That's a fact. A real fact, not a Rudy Fact.

This is hyperbole at its best.
Are deficits increasing? Yes they are, but a significant portion of the Left thinks that that is only "bookkeeping." Wether or not you, or I agree with that, that facto of the matter is, it is the Congress, especially the House which is in charge of the outrageous spending.
The part about expecting the "children of the poor" to pay for it is too egregious a claim to even contemplate. It is not a fact.
 
So out of the whole quote proving the fallacy of your BS, your only take away is that Obama spent taxpayer money on vacations.
Tell us how much money he ended up pocketing as a result of those vacations? I mean, that's your point right? Certainly you wouldn't be trying to distract from yet another time one of your claims is utter BS, would you?

Yup, that's a lot for vacations.

Of course, not as much as the $90,000,000 Donald (I-Won't-Have-Time-To-Play-Golf) Trump spent on golfing trips in the first 11 months of his presidency.

You have a breakdown on that?
 
This is hyperbole at its best.
Are deficits increasing? Yes they are, but a significant portion of the Left thinks that that is only "bookkeeping." Wether or not you, or I agree with that, that facto of the matter is, it is the Congress, especially the House which is in charge of the outrageous spending.
The part about expecting the "children of the poor" to pay for it is too egregious a claim to even contemplate. It is not a fact.

It's absolutely true. The US owes $21 trillion and is the world's largest debtor nation. There aren't enough rich people to pay that debt back. Who's left to pay it?
 
I've read a little of this and the people who forced Sarah Sanders to have to have the protection of the Secret Service seem to be crying alligator tears over how much, for the first time ever, it costs to protect the first family (and members of the administration) when they simply go about their, and our, business. When it was their President, no cost was too great because he had to travel and entertain in the style of he who was the most powerful leader in the world. Even first class was a niggardly expense in his case, he (and by extension, his family) had to flaunt our power and wealth; they had to have their status on display...
 
Please shut the fuck up with the phony concerns for spending taxpayer money. Democrats simply have no credibility in this area. From the Daily Caller:

Sooo.....I forgot what thread exactly but not long ago, and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong About Average, but AA claimed to have been a libertarian for a long time.
 
So out of the whole quote proving the fallacy of your BS, your only take away is that Obama spent taxpayer money on vacations.

No, my point was to call your petty bullshit about his kids alleged expenses with numbers no one on the left gave two shits about when they happened.
 
It's absolutely true. The US owes $21 trillion and is the world's largest debtor nation. There aren't enough rich people to pay that debt back. Who's left to pay it?

The economy is not a matter of who and you know that.
Everyone, every single person is affected by the inflation and taxation that the debt occurs, but that burden falls not on the children of the poor or the very rich, but always upon the Middle Class until you get to Venezuela. Revenues have gone up but spending has not gone down, and that is on the shoulders of the 535, not the 1. If he were to veto that spending all he would do is to earn the ire of every special interest with a hand out for handouts and be subjected to the same hyperbole of how he was harming the poor by cutting off their necessary handouts.
 
Lowering taxes is a good thing, but it has to be coupled with lowering spending. That hasn't happened and we are on track to run up the biggest deficit in history. He's given to the rich and expects the children of the poor to pay for it. That's a fact. A real fact, not a Rudy Fact.

He didn't give it to the rich. He gave the American people the freedom and means of production that would increase their earnings and profits in order to benefit the private sector, the real owners of the country.

Those increased earnings and profits will generate more income for government but that doesn't mean discipline should not be imposed on government spending.

Yes, government spending must come down but the fact that Congress is feckless and refuses to get the message to prioritize spending and confine it to its revenues doesn't mean private Americans in general have to give up the right to life and the pursuit happiness. It is the government who must conform. Big spending politicians and their non-productive constituencies cannot be allowed to determine the fate of the private sector. Big spenders and those nonproductive constituencies must be politically defeated.
 
No, my point was to call your petty bullshit about his kids alleged expenses with numbers no one on the left gave two shits about when they happened.
So I prove your post to be BS, and show even his family is enriching themselves at the taxpayer expense, and your only take away is that nobody cared about $32,000 at the time. :rolleyes:
It might be because it wasn't public and only came our recently because of a FOIA request.

But even if we completely ignore that, you still posted BS about Trump not enriching himself
 
So I prove your post to be BS, and show even his family is enriching themselves at the taxpayer expense, and your only take away is that nobody cared about $32,000 at the time. :rolleyes:
It might be because it wasn't public and only came our recently because of a FOIA request.

But even if we completely ignore that, you still posted BS about Trump not enriching himself

No, my point was nobody on the left cared about the $7,396,531 Obama's spent in 2013 alone on vacation transportation.:rolleyes:
 
No, my point was nobody on the left cared about the $7,396,531 Obama's spent in 2013 alone on vacation transportation.:rolleyes:
So? I don't recall anyone on the right bitching about the even more vacations Bush took.

You are such a disingenuous dumbfuck.
You post BS, I prove you wrong and all you can do is move the goal posts to try to make it about vacation costs.

Again, how much money did Obama pocket from his vacation travels?

But what it comes down to is you posted complete and utter BS, as usual, about Trump not enriching himself via the white house.
 
Back
Top