Trump is finally...

[toeskr]

I find it hard to believe there are so many atheists on a sex site.

Where else do they have to go?

 

[about_average]

You offered your opinion and I gave you back facts. You're so shallow with your name calling.

You provided facts and BS:

Facts
1- Dems refused to read the less redacted report (I agree it was a BS move)
2 - If Trump Cult repubs regain the house the current dem leaders will face political retribution for the temerity of exercising there constitutional duty of oversight. (a very long winded fact stating the obvious)

Opinion
1- Your BS about Mueller

 

[SpeareChucker]

The Republicans aren't going to go after ANYBODY!

They never have.
They try to be the staid, respectable party and
work hard to get those "leaders" to love them.
Like McCain did..., fat lot of good!

Why the hell would they start now?

 

[about_average]

I posted in previous postings exactly what the Mueller report found and the indictments, Manafort, Cohen and all the Russian indictments to include businesses. I'm not going to keep rewriting stuff. We're way past that, keep up. We're talking about FISA, not the evidence of the Mueller report or it's findings. Are you capable of coherent thinking. Between you and Cowflop, you've twisted every conversation anyone has had with you. You lead conversations to another spot to conceal your ineptitude and then babble about shit that's irrelevant to the conversation at hand, and then your infamous tactic, don't you pay attention to the news. You're both frauds.

You're a master of the long winded response to simple questions while continuing to completely ignore the questions. You should run for office.

Again:
How would the judges asking questions establish bias?

And again, how is it the FBI's fault the judges didn't ask who funded the opposition research if it's such a critical piece of information?

And yet again, how does it help the security of the US to notify someone suspected of working as a foreign agent to tell them they are under investigation?

They really aren't difficult questions, even you should be able to answer them.

 

[SpeareChucker]

I find it hard to believe there are so many atheists on a sex site.

Why?

Because they always scream, "OH GOD! OH GOD! OH God ohgodohgodoh...?"

 

[jp55665566]

my girlfriend claims to be an atheist, but always says "oh god, oh god" when we're having sex ~Woody Allen

 

[HisArpy]

You're a master of the long winded response to simple questions while continuing to completely ignore the questions. You should run for office.

Again:
How would the judges asking questions establish bias?

And again, how is it the FBI's fault the judges didn't ask who funded the opposition research if it's such a critical piece of information?

And yet again, how does it help the security of the US to notify someone suspected of working as a foreign agent to tell them they are under investigation?

They really aren't difficult questions, even you should be able to answer them.

The OBLIGATION (you should look up what that means before you reply) is on the FBI to provide all information, including exculpatory evidence as well as supporting evidence, in the warrant application. It's not up to the judge to ask, the Gov is supposed to provide it right up front so the judge doesn't HAVE to ask.

Failure to do this, while also attempting to conceal critical information, is called "committing a fraud upon the court". Misconstruing and hiding the information in "fine print" or a footnote is "concealment" for these purposes.

 

[jomar]

The Republicans aren't going to go after ANYBODY!

They never have.
They try to be the staid, respectable party and
work hard to get those "leaders" to love them.
Like McCain did..., fat lot of good!

Why the hell would they start now?

Did you type this with a straight face?

 

[Rightguide]

The OBLIGATION (you should look up what that means before you reply) is on the FBI to provide all information, including exculpatory evidence as well as supporting evidence, in the warrant application. It's not up to the judge to ask, the Gov is supposed to provide it right up front so the judge doesn't HAVE to ask.

Failure to do this, while also attempting to conceal critical information, is called "committing a fraud upon the court". Misconstruing and hiding the information in "fine print" or a footnote is "concealment" for these purposes.

The reason of course is because this is a secret court who's primary purpose is to protect the Fourth Amendment rights of Americans during classified government surveillance operations that may involve American citizens. This is so because there is no one before the court who speaks for the rights of the target who might be an American citizen except ultimately the Judge and allegedly a handful of high officials who are supposed to be above politics in such matters.

 

[HisArpy]

Did you type this with a straight face?

He probably used his fingers.

 

[HisArpy]

The reason of course is because this is a secret court who's primary purpose is to protect the Fourth Amendment rights of Americans during classified government surveillance operations that may involve American citizens. This is so because there is no one before the court who speaks for the rights of the target who might be an American citizen except ultimately the Judge and allegedly a handful of high officials who are supposed to be above politics in such matters.

Most of those who opine here have no concept about what judges or lawyers actually do. Or what their legal obligations are.

 

[icanhelp1]

You're a master of the long winded response to simple questions while continuing to completely ignore the questions. You should run for office.

Again:
How would the judges asking questions establish bias?

And again, how is it the FBI's fault the judges didn't ask who funded the opposition research if it's such a critical piece of information?

And yet again, how does it help the security of the US to notify someone suspected of working as a foreign agent to tell them they are under investigation?

They really aren't difficult questions, even you should be able to answer them.

In actual time, like I said, judges don't know what they don't know. The information unraveling as we speak leans towards a defrauding a FISA court. It will take an outside investigation to determine that. You know yourself that if Obama was treated like this, or Obama was threatened to be impeached even before his inauguration, dems would cry fowl all the way to SCOTUS

If the fact that Steele was paid to produce a worthless doc and the fact he hated Trumps and the DNC paid for it, and many other oddities, if any of this is left out { spoliation of evidence } If this is the case it will resonate throughout the whole investigation to include Mueller himself.

You twisted my statement again. What I said is that Trump or his counsel or both should have been briefed that the possibility of a Russian agent operating within his campaign, not to brief is fowl play and appears to be agenda driven. Comey told Trump he wasn't under investigation but yet the surveillance investigation transcended over to a criminal investigation.

Things will play out, whether any criminal findings lead to charges remains to be seen. Were there bad players, yes, and deserve to go to prison. Is Trump his own worst enemy, yes, he's not a politician and doesn't act presidentially. In my humble opinion this battle for impeachment is an agenda of revenge between Nadler and Trump and the whole country is suffering for it.

 

[phrodeau]

The OBLIGATION (you should look up what that means before you reply) is on the FBI to provide all information, including exculpatory evidence as well as supporting evidence, in the warrant application. It's not up to the judge to ask, the Gov is supposed to provide it right up front so the judge doesn't HAVE to ask.

Failure to do this, while also attempting to conceal critical information, is called "committing a fraud upon the court". Misconstruing and hiding the information in "fine print" or a footnote is "concealment" for these purposes.

There's no evidence that anything was concealed. You've made an unfounded accusation.

 

[HisArpy]

There's no evidence that anything was concealed. You've made an unfounded accusation.

GOFUCKYOURSELF

 

[jp55665566]

If this Secret Court FISA can be corrupted so easily, we ought not have Secret Courts. Likewise clean out the corrupting influences DOJ/CIA << pure evil.

 

[icanhelp1]

The OBLIGATION (you should look up what that means before you reply) is on the FBI to provide all information, including exculpatory evidence as well as supporting evidence, in the warrant application. It's not up to the judge to ask, the Gov is supposed to provide it right up front so the judge doesn't HAVE to ask.

Failure to do this, while also attempting to conceal critical information, is called "committing a fraud upon the court". Misconstruing and hiding the information in "fine print" or a footnote is "concealment" for these purposes.

I've already stated everything you have written, that process to omit evidence is termed spoliation of evidence. Defrauding the courts is the result of omiting evidence I'm done repeating myself. Because there is no cross examination of evidence in a secret court it is incumbent on the DOJ to provide a complete application with all the relevant facts. It seems sec 702 was loosely applied and agenda driven. We will soon see. The last Horowitz report is a startling revelation as to the bias in the DOJ and to assume that bias did not transcend into the FISA court is laughable on it's face. My humble opinion.

 

[icanhelp1]

If this Secret Court FISA can be corrupted so easily, we ought not have Secret Courts. Likewise clean out the corrupting influences DOJ/CIA << pure evil.

99% of FISA warrants are granted, makes you wonder just how complicit the judges are, and just how often sec 702 was violated and how many civil liberties were trampled on. How many lives were ruined because of strong armed investigative tactics, intimidation, process crimes and entrapment in an attempt to depose a duly elected president. Hundreds of american citizens unmasked.

 

[Rightguide]

There's no evidence that anything was concealed. You've made an unfounded accusation.

Oh but there is:


The damning proof of innocence that FBI likely withheld in Russian probe
BY JOHN SOLOMON, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 03/14/19 04:00 PM EDT 3,332 THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY CONTRIBUTORS ARE THEIR OWN AND NOT THE VIEW OF THE HILL

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...nce-that-fbi-likely-withheld-in-russian-probe

 

[Luk]

Oh but there is:


The damning proof of innocence that FBI likely withheld in Russian probe
BY JOHN SOLOMON, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 03/14/19 04:00 PM EDT 3,332 THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY CONTRIBUTORS ARE THEIR OWN AND NOT THE VIEW OF THE HILL

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...nce-that-fbi-likely-withheld-in-russian-probe

You're too dumb to realize that you're posting an opinion piece as fact.

 

[cowslinger64]

GOFUCKYOURSELF

Lol.. Crybaby poopypants crashed early today.

Waaaaaahhhhhh..

 

[jomar]

He probably used his fingers.

*rimshot*

 

[Kantarii]

GOFUCKYOURSELF

Hahaha hahaha hahaha............ all that needs now is a cute little hashtag or a passive aggressive smiley emoji.
Kant

 

[icanhelp1]

Lol.. Crybaby poopypants crashed early today.

Waaaaaahhhhhh..

Aren't you supposed to be in school stupid?

 

[cowslinger64]

Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
I was actually sticking up for Sleepy Joe Biden while on foreign soil. Kim Jong Un called him a “low IQ idiot,” and many other things, whereas I related the quote of Chairman Kim as a much softer “low IQ individual.” Who could possibly be upset with that?



He's as big an idiot as his supporters.. Cept he has a few bucks, maybe... none for the ball lickers though.

 

[Hal9000_]

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/...atched-to-mideast-over-iran-conduct-exercise/

"The Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group and a U.S. Air Force B-52H Stratofortress conduct joint exercises in the Arabian Sea on June 1."