TRUMP JUST BEING TRUMP

Ah, Gleichschaltung—what a delightfully Teutonic mouthful!
Let me explain briefly what our jingo clown advertises with so much verve.
Gleichschaltung literally means “coordination” or “making the same,” but in practice, it was the Nazis’ way of ensuring that every club, church, school, and local government marched in lockstep with the party line. Think of it as a national game of “Simon Says,” except Simon was a moustachioed dictator and “out” meant a one-way trip to a concentration camp.
By 1933, the Nazis had turned Germany into a political monoculture faster than you can say “Heil Hitler!” Independent trade unions? Banned. Opposition parties? Dissolved. Local governments? Replaced with party loyalists (ring a bell?). Even the Boy Scouts weren’t safe—soon, every youth group was wearing a Hitler Youth uniform, saluting on cue, and learning that the Führer’s favourite colour was, in fact, brown.
Now, let’s hop across the pond to the land of the free and the home of the brave—or at least, the land of the free until someone tries to “Make America Great Again” by turning the White House into a reality TV set. Under Trump’s rule, we saw a rather lite version of Gleichschaltung—let’s call it Gleichschaltung™: Diet Edition. No brownshirts (though the red hats were a nice touch), but a similar obsession with loyalty and a disdain for anyone who dared to disagree.
Federal agencies? Packed with acting officials and yes-men. The Justice Department? Expected to protect the president, not the law. The press? Branded as “fake news” unless they were singing his praises. And let’s not forget the attempts to strong-arm state officials into overturning election results—because nothing says “democracy” like a phone call begging for 11,780 votes.
Of course, the key difference is that America’s institutions—flawed as they are—held firm...ish. No one was sent to a camp for mocking the president (though Twitter bans were handed out like confetti). The courts, the media, and even some Republicans occasionally remembered their spines. But the spirit of Gleichschaltung is there: the insistence that loyalty to the leader trumps (pun intended) loyalty to the country, the law, or common decency.
So, in summary: Germany’s version was a full-blown orchestral performance of authoritarianism, while Trump’s was more of a kazoo solo—loud, off-key, and ultimately cut short by the audience. But let’s not get complacent; as the Germans learned, it’s always easier to stop a kazoo before it becomes a symphony.
Oh, by the way: gold is just glittery brown.
 
Ah, Gleichschaltung—what a delightfully Teutonic mouthful!
Let me explain briefly what our jingo clown advertises with so much verve.
Gleichschaltung literally means “coordination” or “making the same,” but in practice, it was the Nazis’ way of ensuring that every club, church, school, and local government marched in lockstep with the party line. Think of it as a national game of “Simon Says,” except Simon was a moustachioed dictator and “out” meant a one-way trip to a concentration camp.
By 1933, the Nazis had turned Germany into a political monoculture faster than you can say “Heil Hitler!” Independent trade unions? Banned. Opposition parties? Dissolved. Local governments? Replaced with party loyalists (ring a bell?). Even the Boy Scouts weren’t safe—soon, every youth group was wearing a Hitler Youth uniform, saluting on cue, and learning that the Führer’s favourite colour was, in fact, brown.
Now, let’s hop across the pond to the land of the free and the home of the brave—or at least, the land of the free until someone tries to “Make America Great Again” by turning the White House into a reality TV set. Under Trump’s rule, we saw a rather lite version of Gleichschaltung—let’s call it Gleichschaltung™: Diet Edition. No brownshirts (though the red hats were a nice touch), but a similar obsession with loyalty and a disdain for anyone who dared to disagree.
Federal agencies? Packed with acting officials and yes-men. The Justice Department? Expected to protect the president, not the law. The press? Branded as “fake news” unless they were singing his praises. And let’s not forget the attempts to strong-arm state officials into overturning election results—because nothing says “democracy” like a phone call begging for 11,780 votes.
Of course, the key difference is that America’s institutions—flawed as they are—held firm...ish. No one was sent to a camp for mocking the president (though Twitter bans were handed out like confetti). The courts, the media, and even some Republicans occasionally remembered their spines. But the spirit of Gleichschaltung is there: the insistence that loyalty to the leader trumps (pun intended) loyalty to the country, the law, or common decency.
So, in summary: Germany’s version was a full-blown orchestral performance of authoritarianism, while Trump’s was more of a kazoo solo—loud, off-key, and ultimately cut short by the audience. But let’s not get complacent; as the Germans learned, it’s always easier to stop a kazoo before it becomes a symphony.
Oh, by the way: gold is just glittery brown.
You are such a typical member of the Party of perverts,pedofiles and canibals! You THINK you are so so educated yet your words prove otherwise! Sit back and enjoy the show! Its about to get real good! What makes a good movie?A GREAT ENDING! FAFO baby FAFO!
 
You are such a typical member of the Party of perverts,pedofiles and canibals! You THINK you are so so educated yet your words prove otherwise! Sit back and enjoy the show! Its about to get real good! What makes a good movie?A GREAT ENDING! FAFO baby FAFO!
Well then, let's rephrase your reply into something English:
Your remarks are precisely what one might expect from someone associated with such controversial views. While you may consider yourself well-informed, your choice of words suggests otherwise. I encourage you to reflect on the discussion at hand. As for the matter before us, let us see how events unfold—after all, the true measure of a story lies in its conclusion. Time will tell.

After that, here's your reply:
Yes, it will. And you will hopefully learn from your errors.
Provided you are a real person and not just a sock puppet/Russian troll.
 
Last edited:
Well then, let's rephrase your reply into something English:
Your remarks are precisely what one might expect from someone associated with such controversial views. While you may consider yourself well-informed, your choice of words suggests otherwise. I encourage you to reflect on the discussion at hand. As for the matter before us, let us see how events unfold—after all, the true measure of a story lies in its conclusion. Time will tell.

After that, here's your reply:
Yes, it will. And you will hopefully learn from your errors.
Provided you are a real person and not just a sock puppet/Russian troll.

Troll/chaos seeker seems like the case.

But it is interesting though, because of the syntax, the words being used and the overall impression.. it follows the same SoMe lingo pattern as a certain president.
- reinforcing the confirmation bias that seems so common. It definitely adds an extra layer to the cognitive dissonance.
 
Back
Top