Trump Landslides

[LLCox]

Two models that tell vastly different stories. Both have a decent
track record. One had flipped from a Trump win to a Trump loss citing the economy. Obviously neither take the pandemic into account. There’s simply no modeling for that.



https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/20/business/economy-election-trump-biden-jobs/index.html

https://www.mediaite.com/news/trump...nning-reelection-political-science-professor/

The virus will be the death of the trump administration.

 

[Emerson40]

Liberal ideologue, not Republican zealot.

If the (D)'s had run one of their liberal candidates, like Tulsi, they'd still be getting my vote.

(D)'s will have my vote should they become the more liberal party, but right now they aren't.

You keep telling yourself whatever you need to, in order to justify your partisan bias.

Also, you’ve already stated, three usernames ago, that you don’t vote in elections.

More lies, along with your constant confirmation bias and pugnacious posts are some of the reasons you are not taken seriously by most, and engaged by few.
You’re like Klinker, only with a dictionary.

 

[surdeep]

Nixon's '72 Platform was actually quite civilized compared to Rump:


Richard Nixonfor President 1972 Campaign Brochure

‘The Record’



The Economy:

President Nixonhas taken strong action to flatten inflation and increaseemployment. He initiated a 90 day wage-price freeze, followed bymore flexible controls, and introduced a package of tax cuts tostimulate the economy. The inflation rate has been cut in half, andthe Gross National Product has expanded at a yearly rate of over 7%.Housing starts are up 42% over last year.



The Environment:

President Nixonestablished the Environmental Protection Agency, the first Federalunit ever set up to protect our quality of life. He has increasedfunding for environmental improvement by over 500% and initiated aLegacy of Parks program to bring increased recreationalopportunities to cities. No less than 25 separate environment billshave been proposed by him.



Young Americans:

President Nixonhas signed into law the bill giving 18 year-olds the right tovote...overhauled the selective service system with the goal ofestablishing an all-volunteer army...and has proposed an educationprogram that would guarantee a college education to all who qualify,and vocational education training for those who do not wish toattend college.



Foreign Policy:

President Nixonwent to Moscow in May of this year, where he negotiated agreementswith the Soviet Union to limit development of antiballistic missilesystems, jointly explore space, and combat the diseases plaguingmankind. In March, he visited -- Peking where he made a start towardimproving relations between the U.S. And the People's Republic ofChina. The President has called a halt to crisis diplomacy, seekingto reduce tension in such troubled areas as the Middle East.



Revenue Sharing:

In order torelieve the burden of taxes at the State and local level --property, sales, income and other taxes -- the President hasproposed a program to make more monies available to localgovernments by sharing a portion of Federal revenues with them.Offered with no strings attached, this program promises to encourageproblem-solving at the local level where many of the problems are.



Crime:

The President'svigorous law-enforcement policies have cut the increase in thenation's serious crime rate to 1% in the first quarter of this year.Eighty (over half) of our major cities have actual decreases incrime, and Washington, D.C. has achieved a 30% decrease over lastyear alone. This has been made possible by President Nixon's programof increased aid to states and localities.



Older Americans:

President Nixonhas submitted proposals to Congress which have increased SocialSecurity benefits to the nation's elderly by more than one-thirdfrom 1969 to this year -- a greater increase than in any period inhistory of similar length The President has also advanced programsto noble more of the elderly to live in their own homes, and toimprove nursing care and increase jobs for these same citizens.



Health Care:

President Nixonhas earmarked massive amounts of money to find a cure for cancer andsickle cell anemia. Federal outlays for health care and research in1973 will reach $25.5 billion, and the President has proposed aNational Health Insurance Standards Act, a Family Health InsurancePlan, and the National Health Education Foundation, all aiming atbetter health care for EVERYONE.



Drugs:

The Presidenthas won agreement from Turkey to place a total ban on The growing ofopium poppy...made an agreement with France to assist in halting thetraffic of drugs...and stepped up arrests of pushers. He is spending6 times more for rehabilitation and 5 times more for drug educationthan ever before. Combined, these actions are finally turning thetide against the drug scourge.



Vietnam:

The Presidenthas done everything in his power to bring peace to Vietnam withoutsacrificing the South Vietnamese in the process. He has brought home500,000 men...reduced casualties by 98%...and cut spending bytwo-thirds. As this is written, strong steps are being taken to heenemy to get the enemy to cease its aggression and make peace.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

My video footage shows nothing but peaceful protests, but that's besides the point.

Crimes or not, the police don't just show up and whisk people away without PROPER PROCEDURE--not to mention unidentified federal goons. Since when has that been ok in the USA?

Like I said, these people were never "put under arrest." They were not told they were, they were not cautioned, and they were not arrested. So, you can say it over and over, but this wasn't "being put under arrest."

Be that as it may, we don't "arrest" people without ID, warrants, reading of rights, etc. If they're banging the door down, they are suited up and have warrants.

The police do all manner of shit. If it's not done by the book it's police brutality or whatnot. They're supposed to follow procedure.

Video footage says otherwise.



Since always.

It's called being put under arrest.

Shit, we blow peoples doors off at 2am, beat/cuff/kill them, shoot their dogs, traumatize their kids etc. numerous somewhere in the USA every single day.

That's what happens when you violate the law, people authorized by the state, Law Enforcement Officers (LEO's) come and force you, violently if necessary, to comply with the rules of society.

That's how laws work.

 

[RobDownSouth]

The virus will be the death of the trump administration.

and that's just about the only positive thing that will come out of the virus, unless it claims some of the more elderly RWCJ cretins here (OldJourno and Ishmael come to mind).

 

[Emerson40]

Boomer Remover Virus.

 

[LawnStripes]

You keep telling yourself whatever you need to, in order to justify your partisan bias.

That is the point of an ideology.

Also, you’ve already stated, three usernames ago, that you don’t vote in elections.

I don't vote in ALL elections, I'm 100% voting in this one.

More lies, along with your constant confirmation bias and pugnacious posts are some of the reasons you are not taken seriously by most, and engaged by few.

You’re like Klinker, only with a dictionary.

Nah....most leftist just don't have it in them to argue their positions.

 

[LawnStripes]

My video footage shows nothing but peaceful protests, but that's besides the point.

Of course, all that violence and vandalism is some other groups!!!

https://www.reactiongifs.com/r/jlaw-whtvr.gif

Crimes or not, the police don't just show up and whisk people away without PROPER PROCEDURE--not to mention unidentified federal goons. Since when has that been ok in the USA?

Since forever.

Like I said, these people were never "put under arrest." They were not told they were, they were not cautioned, and they were not arrested. So, you can say it over and over, but this wasn't "being put under arrest."

Oh so they just turned them loose immidiately?

No harm no foul then.

Be that as it may, we don't "arrest" people without ID, warrants, reading of rights, etc. If they're banging the door down, they are suited up and have warrants.

Yea....and if they grab you off the street and throw you in the can?

They have probable cause, maybe even a warrant, maybe not, sort it out in court.

The police do all manner of shit. If it's not done by the book it's police brutality or whatnot. They're supposed to follow procedure.

Sure.

And if procedure was followed or not gets settled in a court of law.

 

[sethp]

Not sure how to factor how much weaker a candidate Biden is than Hillary. All her baggage and none of her gravitas.

This. Taking away all of the propaganda ...Biden is weaker than Hillary by far...he’s like Romney against Obama weak. Of course Trump is weaker now too than he was in 2016. I think Biden really does have dementia or some kind of cognitive decline. If Trump destroys him in a debate...

 

[Wrong Element]

Nixon's '72 Platform was actually quite civilized compared to Rump:

Nixon had imposed wage and price controls and launched the EPA. True, there was the little matter of corruption, but the far right was still a couple of elections away from seizing control. We still had two sane parties in 1972.



Speaking of progressive platforms, how about this provocative language from the GOP's 2016 document?


The over-federalization of criminal justice is one of many ways in which the government in Washington has intruded beyond its proper jurisdiction. The essential role of federal law enforcement personnel in protecting federal property and combating interstate crime should not be compromised by diversion to matters properly handled by state and local authorities.

 

[Sean]

This. Taking away all of the propaganda ...Biden is weaker than Hillary by far...he’s like Romney against Obama weak. Of course Trump is weaker now too than he was in 2016. I think Biden really does have dementia or some kind of cognitive decline. If Trump destroys him in a debate...

Last time I saw Biden debate was the VP race against Ryan. And Biden fucking annihilated him.

 

[sethp]

Last time I saw Biden debate was the VP race against Ryan. And Biden fucking annihilated him.

Yeah but that was over 8 years ago? Biden isn’t as sharp as he was then. He didn’t look sharp in the Primaries..and Trump will go way harder. Thoughts?

 

[Sean]

Yeah but that was over 8 years ago? Biden isn’t as sharp as he was then. He didn’t look sharp in the Primaries..and Trump will go way harder. Thoughts?

Biden didn't have to be sharp in the primaries. All the Dem primary debates I saw were won by Liz Warren. Fat lot of good it did her. And Joe is waaaaay smarter than Trump. He's been in this game a long time.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

>>CLearly shows you have no idea what actually happened.

Oh so they just turned them loose immidiately?

No harm no foul then.


.

 

[Rightguide]

Last time I saw Biden debate was the VP race against Ryan. And Biden fucking annihilated him.

Must have been back when his neurotransmitters did so in real time.

 

[Pookie]

Biden didn't have to be sharp in the primaries. All the Dem primary debates I saw were won by Liz Warren. Fat lot of good it did her. And Joe is waaaaay smarter than Trump. He's been in this game a long time.

Biden will occasionally stumble on a word or phrase. Trump can't even think much less speak a complete thought.

 

[HisArpy]

Biden will occasionally stumble on a word or phrase. Trump can't even think much less speak a complete thought.

Really? I thought this was rather coherent.

You don't have to drop bombs on everybody. You don't have to kill people.

 

[zipman]

Really? I thought this was rather coherent.

So given the opportunity to discuss his top priority items, the ass clown in chief can only say he doesn't want to drop bombs on everybody.

What a fucking joke Trump and the Republicans have become.

The pride of the Republican party is proud because he can correctly identify a picture of an elephant.

 

[HisArpy]

So given the opportunity to discuss his top priority items, the ass clown in chief can only say he doesn't want to drop bombs on everybody.

What a fucking joke Trump and the Republicans have become.

The pride of the Republican party is proud because he can correctly identify a picture of an elephant.

Trump campaigned on getting us OUT of the endless mid east wars. You must have missed that part in your efforts to get out the mob, er... vote.

 

[Pookie]

Really? I thought this was rather coherent.

Two sentences/fourteen words. Not bad for Donald. Relevance is unknown though.

 

[Pookie]

Really? I thought this was rather coherent.

Perspective.

https://reason.com/2020/06/29/trump-said-you-dont-have-to-drop-bombs-on-everybody-hes-right/

Asked by Fox News host Sean Hannity last Thursday to detail his top priorities for a second term in the White House, President Donald Trump descended into an incoherence remarkable even by his standards. At the end of the ramble, though, he said something interesting: "I have great people in the administration. You make some mistakes. Like, you know, an idiot like [former National Security Adviser John] Bolton. All he wanted to do was drop bombs on everybody. You don't have to drop bombs on everybody. You don't have to kill people."

 

[Carnal_Flower]

You don't have to drop bombs on everybody. You can just kill them by ignoring a raging pandemic.

So . . . "You don't have to drop bombs on everybody" is what he wants accomplish in his second term?

Really? I thought this was rather coherent.

 

[HisArpy]

Two sentences/fourteen words. Not bad for Donald. Relevance is unknown though.

To me it's amazing how people can think that those 14 words were "incoherent". IMO, had then been spoken by anyone else, no one would even be considering linking them to such a claim.

But, because it was said by Trump, that's what the Left calls it. It's been one of the Lefty mantras since he took office along with "not Presidential".

Strange how saying you don't have to drop bombs on people isn't "Presidential" because it's "incoherent".

 

[Pookie]

To me it's amazing how people can think that those 14 words were "incoherent". IMO, had then been spoken by anyone else, no one would even be considering linking them to such a claim.

But, because it was said by Trump, that's what the Left calls it. It's been one of the Lefty mantras since he took office along with "not Presidential".

Strange how saying you don't have to drop bombs on people isn't "Presidential" because it's "incoherent".

Much like the blind squirrel and nut, even Trump can occasionally put together a sentence or two that is grammatically correct. Added to the other random words he spoke, it's gibberish at best as an answer ... and that's with the softball question asked by his buddy.

 

[Comshaw]

Biden will occasionally stumble on a word or phrase. Trump can't even think much less speak a complete thought.

Really? I thought this was rather coherent.

That explains one hell of a lot.


Comshaw