Trump outs CNN as "fake news"

Other than posting your version of smut, why are you here?

Does posting your vile opinion of anyone who doesn't agree with you give you a hard on?

What do you have against smut? :confused: Stories and poems by some of us, especially pornographic stories, are what keep this site operating and providing a place for you and others to post opinions.
 
My dad was a reporter for 50 years.

You're wasting your breath with Trump's Army though. Too brainwashed.

Everything makes sense now. A reporter's daughter. Do they actually contribute anything to society? Or is sticking a microphone and camera in a grieving person's face, your idea of an upstanding person?
 
Everything makes sense now. A reporter's daughter. Do they actually contribute anything to society? Or is sticking a microphone and camera in a grieving person's face, your idea of an upstanding person?

Hahaha That's so true. The job of reporting is to get the highest ratings possible and to get the most views/clicks. This girl seems to have mastered the art.
 
Lmao

Cut open skulls; remove brains. Insert Hannity chip.

Who uses semicolons anymore? lol

As far as Hannity goes, who the fuck watches Hannity? I've never heard "I was watching Hannity the other day" in my entire life and I live in Georgia.
 
Who uses semicolons anymore? lol

As far as Hannity goes, who the fuck watches Hannity? I've never heard "I was watching Hannity the other day" in my entire life and I live in Georgia.

I and other authors frequently use semicolons.
 
Everything makes sense now. A reporter's daughter. Do they actually contribute anything to society? Or is sticking a microphone and camera in a grieving person's face, your idea of an upstanding person?

You are a fucking worthless Trump Troller. Idiot.
 
What do you have against smut? :confused: Stories and poems by some of us, especially pornographic stories, are what keep this site operating and providing a place for you and others to post opinions.

I got nothing against smut. That's half the reason I come here is for the smut.
 
CNN is nothing more than a Democratic propaganda outlet. From the Podesta Wikileaks and other sources:


CNN

On April 28, 2016, a Democratic National Committee official indicates the DNC can supply CNN with questions to ask Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz. In an email titled, “Cruz on CNN,” the DNC official emails DNC colleagues that “CNN is looking for questions. Please send some topical/interesting ones. Maybe a couple on Fiorina. Someone please take point and send them all together by 3pm. Thank you!”

The Clinton campaign emailed that CNN politics producer Dan Merica and Clinton were “basically courting each other.”

In an email, Democratic National Committee chair Donna Brazile (then a CNN contributor) said she obtained an advance presidential debate question and passed it on to the Hillary campaign. The question was later asked in a March 13 Democratic presidential town hall including Democrat Bernie Sanders and co-hosted by CNN. Brazile says she didn’t do what she allegedly said she did in the email.

A second email revealed Brazile passed along to the Clinton campaign another advance question in advance of a CNN primary debate between Clinton and Sanders. “One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash. Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint,” Brazile wrote on March 5, 2016. On March 6, a woman fitting the description asked a similar question.

CNN political commentator Maria Cardona emailed Democratic National Committee officials a draft of her opinion piece that attacked Bernie Sanders prior to the upcoming Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia. She invited the DNC’s editorial input and made changes accordingly, asking the DNC, “Is this better?”

The pro-Hillary Clinton super PAC American Bridge claimed it “placed” negative stories about Jeb Bush with CNN and other news outlets.

American Bridge also claimed that a report it produced against the conservative Koch Brothers (billionaire donors) resulted in “a high-profile CNN story.”

CNN = Fake News.

QED
 
The smut I post to the story site pays my dues to post to the forum. You, not so much.

I see, so that makes you better than everyone else? Or just another swinging dick with an opinion...

It isn't my "vile" opinion when posting about Trump--it's his own vileness he makes no effort to hide, which makes your vileness in swallowing his crap all the more evident.

Bless your heart...

I guess since I'm not slobbering Liberal cock all day I MUST be one of the deplorables, eh?
 
CNN is nothing more than a Democratic propaganda outlet. From the Podesta Wikileaks and other sources:




CNN = Fake News.

QED
Do you know what QED means? You need to demonstrandum a bit more than that.

You have shown that CNN allowed manipulation from the DNC. You haven't shown fakery. They are not the same thing.

Richard Nixon was a crooked president, but Richard Nixon was not a fake president. See how that works?
 
Do you know what QED means? You need to demonstrandum a bit more than that.

You have shown that CNN allowed manipulation from the DNC. You haven't shown fakery. They are not the same thing.

Richard Nixon was a crooked president, but Richard Nixon was not a fake president. See how that works?

I'm well aware of what QED means -- it means I proved my point. Manipulation of news creates fake news. How could it not?

If not, what exactly does it create?

Are you trying to say that CNN created "crooked" news not "fake" news? Is that somehow different? Better?

Tell me, exactly, how that works.
 
I'm well aware of what QED means -- it means I proved my point. Manipulation of news creates fake news. How could it not?

If not, what exactly does it create?

Are you trying to say that CNN created "crooked" news not "fake" news? Is that somehow different? Better?

Tell me, exactly, how that works.
Which of the tales you told resulted in a fake story?
 
The debates really happened,

And the debates were rigged. HRC was secretly fed the questions before the debates.

The Podesta emails showed that Sanders never had a chance.
 
As slanted as Fox is, I would still consider it a news organization. They ALL have some sort of slant, with the exception of CSpan.

MSNBC is not, it's political discussion and entertainment ABOUT the news.

All of them make errors, and all of them have had scandals. No one's perfect.

But there is a body of events and facts. The election happened. Shit happens. Some dude shot up an airport. They get discussed and interpreted, sometimes twisted, but you're off the deep end if you no longer believe the shit that happens happens.

The problem is all you paranoid Hannity drones have become so disoriented you don't know what's news and what's not anymore.

Use your brains. You're not stupid.
 
Back
Top