Trump secures coveted White Supremacist Endorsement

Nineteen years ago, December 8, 1995 Al Sharpton Incited The Massacre At Freddy's Fashion Mart



Nineteen years ago, December 8, 1995, Al Sharpton incited the violent firebombing of Freddy's Fashion Mart in Harlem, causing the the deaths of Angelina Marrero . . . Cynthia Martinez . . . Luz Ramos . . . Mayra Rentas . . . Olga Garcia . . . Garnette Ramautar . . . Kareem Brunner.... names forever linked together as the seven victims of the Sharpton-caused massacre at Freddy's Fashion Mart.

It all started as a rent dispute in the summer of 1995:

The United House of Prayer, a large African-American church was also a major landlord in Harlem. They raised the rent Freddy's Fashion Mart, a Jewish-owned clothing store which had operated from the same Harlem location for over 40 years. In turn Freddy's had to raise the rent on its sub-tenant, a black-owned record store. A landlord-tenant dispute ensued. As he has done so often in his life, Al Sharpton turned this non-racial economic dispute into a racial conflict.

As reported in the Jewish Post:

The church also owns 272 West 125th Street, site of the fire. It recently began a $4.5 million renovation of the building. Mr. Katz said "They were looking to kick out any businesses that were in the way of the renovation, that looked crummy, or that weren't paying as much rent as they felt could be earned. Kentucky Fried Chicken -- a high-rent-payer -- was forced out so they could build an entrance facing 125th Street. The Jewish-owned meat market lost their lease, and their space was given to Freddy's.".... the "real villain here was the church's real-estate broker, Malcolm Barksdale [who is black]. I can imagine how he must have pressured Shange. I was a good tenant. I paid my rent on the first of the month, every month for 30 years. Yet, when Barksdale came to see me about terminating my lease, he was very arrogant and rude. He treated me like ape-s---, and you can quote me on that."

The Sharpton-led protests began in August and came to a head on the morning of Friday, December 8th when Roland James Smith, Jr., who had been part of the Sharpton's protests, walked into Freddy's Fashion Mart, pulled out a gun, ordered all the black customers to leave, spilled paint thinner on several bins of clothing and set them on fire -- a fire that resulted in killing 7 people plus Smith. The only African American left in the story was Freddy's security guard Kareem Brunner, 22-years-old, who was ordered to stay by the mass murderer Smith.

At the time the faux-preacher claimed he wasn't involved in the protests, he was only there to mediate. He also claimed there was no Antisemitism involved in the protests, but he has been proven to be a liar.

Soon after the massacre, the Jewish Action Alliance, a New York-based civil-rights group, released audiotapes and transcripts of several of Sharpton's weekly radio show in which Morris Powell, leader of the 125th Street Vendor's Association, can be heard using racial and anti-Semitic language to encourage Harlem residents to boycott Freddy's. Learning from his Crown Heights experience Sharpton let others push the anti-Semitic hatred but it was all done on his show.

"We are going to see that this cracker suffers," Powell is heard telling a crowd in one broadcast on Aug. 19.


"Reverend Sharpton is on it. We have made contact with these crackers. We don't expect a lot out of them. They haven't seen how we feel about anything yet. We are going to show them."

He also said

They think they gonna drive this man out of business, they gotta be out of their minds. We are not gonna stand idly by and let a Jewish person come in Black Harlem and methodically drive black people out of business up and down 125th Street. If we stand for that, we'll stand for anything. Which we've been doing.

At a rally recorded on Sept. 9, Sharpton is heard telling a crowd:

"I want to make it clear to the radio audience and to you here that we will not stand by and allow them to move this brother so that some white interloper can expand his business on 125th Street.

Ironically Sharpton was the interloper, he was living in Hollis Queens around the time Freddy's opened in Harlem and living in New Jersey when Freddy's was burned down. When other white-owned businesses fled the neighborhood as the population became more African-American, Fred Harari the owner of Freddy's continued to serve the neighborhood.

On an October 21st Sharpton broadcast Norman "Granddad" Reide said:
I am saying to the Jewish community and specifically to Abraham Foxman, that you come out and utter a word, accusatory remark against Reverend Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Donna Wilson, Reverend Shields, or Gary Byrd, we will boycott you and nobody loves money any more than the Jewish people. Thank you.
In court papers filed the day before the fire, Harari and two employees described weeks of protests outside the clothing store. Sharpton’s National Action Network sets up picket lines; customers going into Freddy’s were spat on and cursed as “traitors” and “Uncle Toms.” Some protesters shouted, “Burn down the Jew store!” and simulate striking a match. “We’re going to see that this cracker suffers,” says Sharpton’s colleague Morris Powell.

An affidavit by Kareem Brunner, a black security guard killed in the blaze, said that he had been called a "cracker lover" and "would get mine as a traitor [to the black race]." Brunner, was the only black that Smith did not order out of the store before setting it afire.

Store manager, Steve Brodsky, described how a particularly vicious demonstrator called Shabazz would force his way into the store, pushing Brodsky aside and shout "I will be back to burn the Jew store down -- burn, burn, burn."

On Dec. 8, one of the protesters , Roland James Smith, Jr listened. He burst into Freddy’s, shot four employees point-blank, then set the store on fire. Seven employees died in the inferno.


When the tragedy occurred, Al Sharpton denied all responsibility and said "People are trying to put me in the middle of this. I only came one time. I met with the people from the church. ... I was only there a matter of minutes. I was not the leader of this. I was only in support of Shange."

He criticized NYPD investigators for quickly linking the fire to the protesters. But the police evidence and the tapes from the Jewish Alliance proved him to be a liar. Not only were the protesters involved they did it right in front of him at Freddy's or on his radio show.

After first telling the press "What's wrong with calling someone a white interloper?" he apologized for using that term. He never apologized for the Jew-hatred broadcast on his radio shows and spoken at the rallies he helped to organize. He continues to deny that the rallies had anything to do with the firebombing.

Al Sharpton cannot be forgiven for his role in the pogrom at Freddy’s or any of his other bigotry because he has never acknowledged his role, nor has he ever apologized (even though his actions/speeches, etc. were caught on tape).

But today Al Sharpton is a media darling with his own show on MSNBC, an adviser to President Obama and friend to AG Eric Holder. And he still makes excuses for hatred:
Are you forgetting the Tawana Brawley hoax?
 
What lies? It isn't that police shoot minorities and often get away with it. The rest is just dressing.

Michael Brown and many others almost always have a hand in their own demise. Their decisions are flawed to begin with. This is a little fact the media prefers to ignore. The narrative is police state oppression.. Any story other than this narrative is preferrably ignored. The vast majority of Americans can plainly see this. It is why the mass media are a bunch of whores, selling the snake oil of oppression 24/7. Nothing sells like a good "woe is me" tale.
 
Michael Brown and many others almost always have a hand in their own demise. Their decisions are flawed to begin with. This is a little fact the media prefers to ignore. The narrative is police state oppression.. Any story other than this narrative is preferrably ignored. The vast majority of Americans can plainly see this. It is why the mass media are a bunch of whores, selling the snake oil of oppression 24/7. Nothing sells like a good "woe is me" tale.

Micheal Brown should by all logic have not been approached in the first place. The media is not off on this and truth be told they undersell the entire scenario. Notice how quiet they are that Ferguson is essentially a shake down operation. An entire city that exists to shake down it's in habitants.
 
Micheal Brown should by all logic have not been approached in the first place. The media is not off on this and truth be told they undersell the entire scenario. Notice how quiet they are that Ferguson is essentially a shake down operation. An entire city that exists to shake down it's in habitants.

Whoa! He had just robbed a convenience store and was strutting down the middle of the street.
 
Whoa! He had just robbed a convenience store and was strutting down the middle of the street.

Except the cop knew nothing of the convience store rendering it utterly moot. And since when does Jaywalking warrant more than honking a horn? But lets say that part was justified, are we honestly buying the story where he rushed a car?
 
Except the cop knew nothing of the convience store rendering it utterly moot. And since when does Jaywalking warrant more than honking a horn? But lets say that part was justified, are we honestly buying the story where he rushed a car?

But you do know the DRUG INFUSED HULKING THUG bum rushed the cop, tried to grab gun

Why the fuck are you lying?

You need to be shot
 
Micheal Brown should by all logic have not been approached in the first place. The media is not off on this and truth be told they undersell the entire scenario. Notice how quiet they are that Ferguson is essentially a shake down operation. An entire city that exists to shake down it's in habitants.

DRUG INFUSED HULKING THUG shoulda gone to sidewalk when asked to bu cop

Instead of BUM RUSHING N TRYING TO GET GUN
 
Except the cop knew nothing of the convience store rendering it utterly moot. And since when does Jaywalking warrant more than honking a horn? But lets say that part was justified, are we honestly buying the story where he rushed a car?

Yep, I'm sure buying that he rushed the car. He was born and raised an in-your-face thug. He was no innocent lamb. He was on a lawless high and he brought it on himself. The cop not knowing he'd just robbed a convenience store doesn't cover HIM knowing he had and being in the in-your-face mode.

That's the problem with total apologists of blacks on this issue. There's no differentiation between those involved, so the defense gets ridiculous. I've seen plenty of instances of dumb police overreaction to blacks. This isn't one of them and trying to lump this lawless thug and all those like him into one innocent victim pile is what loses your argument with a lot of us.
 
Yep, I'm sure buying that he rushed the car. He was born and raised an in-your-face thug. He was no innocent lamb. He was on a lawless high and he brought it on himself.

That's the problem with total apologists of blacks on this issue. There's no differentiation between those involved, so the defense gets ridiculous. I've seen plenty of instances of dumb police overreaction to blacks. This isn't one of them and trying to lump this lawless thug and all those like him into one innocent victim pile is what loses your argument with a lot of us.
You have temporarily UN NIGGERIZED, yourself, TEMPORARILY

And shitcan the you have me on Iggy
 
Yep, I'm sure buying that he rushed the car. He was born and raised an in-your-face thug. He was no innocent lamb. He was on a lawless high and he brought it on himself. The cop not knowing he'd just robbed a convenience store doesn't cover HIM knowing he had and being in the in-your-face mode.

That's the problem with total apologists of blacks on this issue. There's no differentiation between those involved, so the defense gets ridiculous. I've seen plenty of instances of dumb police overreaction to blacks. This isn't one of them and trying to lump this lawless thug and all those like him into one innocent victim pile is what loses your argument with a lot of us.

I don't buy that anybody in the real world is remotely that stupid. One shouldn't need to be innocent to survive anyway.
 
As I noted, you lose me when you throw a thug like this into the mix.

And that's fine. I'm pretty sure America is at an impasse and blacks need to simply shut up and suck it up. This is as good as it gets and I get it.
 
And that's fine. I'm pretty sure America is at an impasse and blacks need to simply shut up and suck it up. This is as good as it gets and I get it.

No you don't get it. It has to be all or nothing to you. You throw away objectivity. Not all cases fit in the same pile. You don't get it because you won't be objective about it. You give the lawless in-your-face thugs (at least the black ones) a pass. I don't give Michael Brown a pass--he's the poster child for justifying being lawless because of his color.
 
No you don't get it. It has to be all or nothing to you. You throw away objectivity. Not all cases fit in the same pile. You don't get it because you won't be objective about it. You give the lawless in-your-face thugs (at least the black ones) a pass. I don't give Michael Brown a pass--he's the poster child for justifying being lawless because of his color.

Objectively some things are all or nothing. I don't believe he was a lawless in your face thug but at some point it ceases to matter. Its not like this turned out much differently for a kid in a hoodie walking home. Or selling a cigarette, or a woman firing a gun in the air in a stand your ground state. It doesn't matter if you're a Harvard Professor in your own home for fuck sake.

Please tell me how we're supposed to fight ANYTHING if all the opponents have to do is shout thug and call it a day?

Note: Whitey Bulger killed GANG members and that wasn't even allowed to be brought up because reasons. If killing known mob members doesn't get you a "this guy deserved it pass" then no petty crook should rate it.

Objectively either the fight is worth fighting or it's not.

Subjectively we can continue on because fuck you that's why but I've always believed that's a stupid reason to do anything.
 
Objectively some things are all or nothing. I don't believe he was a lawless in your face thug but at some point it ceases to matter. Its not like this turned out much differently for a kid in a hoodie walking home. Or selling a cigarette, or a woman firing a gun in the air in a stand your ground state. It doesn't matter if you're a Harvard Professor in your own home for fuck sake.

Yes, it does matter, dammit. Which is my point. You're making it not matter by not being objective about it. You could name plenty of cop-on-black incidents (sometimes black cop on black, incidentally) that I would totally agree was out-of-control cop overreaction and they shock and disgust me--especially because they just keep on going regardless of the light being cast on them.

But Michael Brown is not one of those cases, and you lumping him in with them and now doing your all or nothing whining is what destroys your case with me. You just can't be objective about this issue.

Don't try to guilt me on this. That dog don't bark. And it didn't bark for anyone else responsible for taking an objective look at the Michael Brown case either. What needs to happen is for society to stop raising Michael Browns, not to give them free passes.
 
Last edited:
See, your response is not to try to be objective; it's just to shut down behind your all or nothing walls.
 
You're the one shutting down. I asked a question. In real terms what difference did it make? I suppose you could argue he didn't get shot but cops don't shoot every or even most blacks they come into contact with. His station, hard work and presumably poise didn't prevent him from suffering the same indignity at least from where I'm sitting. The fact that we're having this conversation means you do think he was treated appropriately and I'm the one being irrational.

Which is why I think it's time we shut down BLM and just go back to sleep.

Don't run, you'll just die tired.
 
You asked a question that's irrelevant to the discussion we were having. The sliding away technique. I'm not biting. The topic was your statement of Michael Brown's "by all logic" guiltlessness for what happened to him.

Making a martyr of a lawless, in-your-face thug like Michael Brown, no matter what color, isn't the answer to anything. Stopping raising Michael Browns is what we need. Not going to get there by justifying who they are and what they did.

If you go off on a tangent, that's your decision. I'm not putting the time into going there with you. I stuck with the specific issue I responded to.
 
Last edited:
so

when are the DUMZ going to be asked to repudiate

BLM

SHARPTON

JACKSON

FARAKHAN?
 
You asked a question that's irrelevant to the discussion we were having. The sliding away technique. I'm not biting. The topic was your statement of Michael Brown's "by all logic" guiltlessness for what happened to him.

Making a martyr of a lawless, in-your-face thug like Michael Brown, no matter what color, isn't the answer to anything. Stopping raising Michael Browns is what we need. Not going to get there by justifying who they are and what they did.

If you go off on a tangent, that's your decision. I'm not putting the time into going there with you. I stuck with the specific issue I responded to.

I didn't say guiltless. I said the confrontation shouldn't have occured in the first place.

But him being a Micheal Brown shouldn't matter. Just as if the same scenario had lead to the leader of ISIS getting shot the cop would STILL be the wrong party.
 
Back
Top