Trump Vs Clinton

[Aglaopheme]

Emily Shugarman at Revilist was the only "journalist" to take the bait. First she was promised a very flaky sounding FaceTime interview and eventually she had to settle for a phone interview with somebody in the background obviously coaching.

A voice on the phone and a pseudonym.

"I don't know if Johnson wrote that letter. In fact, I don't know if the Katie Johnson I spoke to is the same girl who Trump allegedly raped in 1994, or if that girl even exists. I have never seen Johnson — in person, or via FaceTime, as I was originally promised — and I have not spoken to her only eyewitness, Tiffany Doe. To my knowledge, no journalist has."

With Epstein in the news if there was ANYTHING to this story it would be all over the news.

Why isn't it?

We know why.

Aglo doesn't.

It's just ridiculous to have to keep debunking all the crap that they throw against the wall.

they're trying to guilt Trump by association all of which is deflecting from clints Tunes actual very close Association that definitely involve Epstein and female passengers some identified by gender only, making it pretty clear what their value as human beings on those flights was to the other passengers. Many are just first names.

But, but, Trump was leering at women, in public with cameras rolling with Epstein. he MUST have done something sometime.

#Whataboutism(A term plucked from obscurity to deflect from exact this sort of thing for the HRC campaign)ForMeButNotforThee!!

So much irony in the defense of Trump here I can’t even.

Do you think victims have a right to privacy?

 

[Aglaopheme]

Clinton has been accused of rape.

No kidding.

Moron


Both cannot be an option when the metric is worst.

Yet folks said both. Go figure.

 

[Aglaopheme]

I won’t quote any more of your frothing at the mouth pists, but I will add that I’m certainly not going to take anything you have to say about what the DNC is doing as serious. I think my sources are a little better.

 

[notfeasance]

Do you think victims have a right to privacy?

Alleged victims in a court proceeding? Nope.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Alleged victims in a court proceeding? Nope.

Yet it happens despite your opinion.

 

[Rightguide]

I won’t quote any more of your frothing at the mouth pists, but I will add that I’m certainly not going to take anything you have to say about what the DNC is doing as serious. I think my sources are a little better.

Your sources said there was no coup attempt against Trump, no FISA abuse, that Trump was a Russian agent working for Putin, and a number of other demonstrable lies and mental issues.

 

[pantalaimonlyra]

I can't believe we've reached the point in our little dystopia where we're arguing over whether a current president or former president is a bigger sexual predator. It's been a wild ride.

 

[thinkingofyou3000]

Smart ass. Has Hillary ever been accused of sexual misconduct?

Who would have her?

 

[dolf]

They're both horrible. I mean, given ultimate power I suspect I'd be worse than both put together, but I wasn't running.

Two crooks. Two liars. One who treats women badly for himself, the other who'll treat women badly on behalf of her husband. Both are more drawn by power than driven by ideals.

On balance, trump is probably potentially more damaging because he's impulsive. He says before he thinks, and you never know quite what the unintended consequence of that might be.

The majority of the appeal of each seems to be that they weren't the other. You ask the supporters of one about the flaws of their choice, and all you'll get in response is the flaws of the other.

 

[adrina]

They're both horrible. I mean, given ultimate power I suspect I'd be worse than both put together, but I wasn't running.

Two crooks. Two liars. One who treats women badly for himself, the other who'll treat women badly on behalf of her husband. Both are more drawn by power than driven by ideals.

On balance, trump is probably potentially more damaging because he's impulsive. He says before he thinks, and you never know quite what the unintended consequence of that might be.

The majority of the appeal of each seems to be that they weren't the other. You ask the supporters of one about the flaws of their choice, and all you'll get in response is the flaws of the other.

As a heads up, the poll meant Bill Clinton.

 

[dolf]

As a heads up, the poll meant Bill Clinton.

Horrible too. Just better at hiding it.

 

[Biggs_Darklighter]

Horrible too. Just better at hiding it.

Yes, at least Bill was likable on the surface.