Trump wants a military parade

Your hypocrisy is a thing of beauty. You can't post a single link because you're lying. Cheetolini isn't even an indirect reference to Hitler. You're lying. Sad!

You can't point out the hypocrisy, probably don't even know what the fuck that word means.

It's a reference to his ally and an iconic fascist dictator in his own right, Mussollini.

Equally as insane.

You're either a total fucking moron for not understanding that or pathetically desperate to shit sling anything not a loyal (D)ick sucker.

THAT is sad. ;)
 
How exactly ? :confused:


Don't worry I know you can't answer that with anything but deflection and likely blatant lies.

You shouldn't join Daily in being so very very desperate to label me an (R) because I don't think Trump is "LIKE TOTALLYYYYYYYYY HITLER N' STUFF!!" ......it's a fucking pathetic look.

You can't point out the hypocrisy, probably don't even know what the fuck that word means.

It's a reference to his ally and an iconic fascist dictator in his own right, Mussollini.

Equally as insane.

You're either a total fucking moron for not understanding that or pathetically desperate to shit sling anything not a loyal (D)ick sucker.

THAT is sad. ;)

There's your hypocrisy you lying fucktard. Now, go ahead and try to weasel out again.
 
I knew you didn't understand what that word means.

You also don't seem to know what a lie is.

Fuckin' brilliant LOL

Right. You always ask for proof, it's given to you, then you either deny it's true or skip over it completely. I asked a simple question about something that you said is happening by multiple people but can't provide a single link.

Ok frizzle fry. :eek:
 
No they haven't. The meaning of the word and the title are not the same.

Christ...

Führer has been used as a military title (compare Latin Dux) in Germany since at least the 18th century. The usage of the term "Führer" in the context of a company-sized military subunit in the German Army referred to a commander lacking the qualifications for permanent command. For example, the commanding officer of a company was (and is) titled "Kompaniechef" (literally, Company Chief), but if he did not have the requisite rank or experience, or was only temporarily assigned to command, he was officially titled "Kompanieführer". Thus operational commands of various military echelons were typically referred to by their formation title followed by the title Führer, in connection with mission-type tactics used by the German military forces. The term Führer was also used at lower levels, regardless of experience or rank; for example, a Gruppenführer was the leader of a squad of infantry (9 or 10 men).
 
Uh, wrong... Fuhrer is the German word for leader.

Literally thousands upon thousands of people have held the title Fuhrer.

Here. I"m not a fan of wiki but whatever.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Führer

Führer was the unique name granted by Adolf Hitler to himself, in his function as Vorsitzender (chairman) of the Nazi Party.


As a political title it is most associated with the Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler, who was the only person to hold the position of Führer.
 
Anyway before this turns into a link battle and I get bored, clearly people here compared Trump directly to Hitler. No question about that. Been bothering me since the first time I saw someone deny it happened.
Cheetohllini is better tho. More accurate both in physical description and as a comparison to a fascist.
 
LoL. I don't think any of those were on frizzle fry's list and none reference Hitler. You seem to try and troll me like you know me. Funny, that.

I have responded to a post of yours outside of this thread maybe 2 or 3 times. Neither time would be considered trolling by anyone nor would anything I said be construed as having known you in any capacity. You either have me confused with someone else or you're making it up because you don't like being argued with. Don't really care either way, just pointing it out.
 
You said that no one else has ever had the title Fuhrer. You're 100% wrong.

If you can't admit that, that's your shortcoming to deal with.

Whatever dude. You like to nitpick so you can be right. That's fine.
Doesn't change anything if I'm wrong about that aspect of it unless you really think all those people were referring to old German soldiers just for the fun of it.
 
Whatever dude. You like to nitpick so you can be right. That's fine.
Doesn't change anything if I'm wrong about that aspect of it unless you really think all those people were referring to old German soldiers just for the fun of it.

I didn't comment on who was being referenced. I commented on your incorrect assertion that no one else has ever had the title Fuhrer. Facts matter, and you're playing fast and loose with facts... Trump style.

I have never called Trump a nazi, or hitler, or anything of the sort, contrary to Botany Boy's lies.

Nothing you posted contradicts anything I've stated, and you're unable to admit that you're wrong about your assertion that no one else has been called Fuhrer, so I'll just chalk that up to a lack of moral character on your part.
 
I didn't comment on who was being referenced. I commented on your incorrect assertion that no one else has ever had the title Fuhrer. Facts matter, and you're playing fast and loose with facts... Trump style.

I have never called Trump a nazi, or hitler, or anything of the sort, contrary to Botany Boy's lies.

Nothing you posted contradicts anything I've stated, and you're unable to admit that you're wrong about your assertion that no one else has been called Fuhrer, so I'll just chalk that up to a lack of moral character on your part.

I wasn't talking to you so why would anything I post contradict you?
The other guy said they didn't reference Hitler when they quite obviously did. You wanna take something else from that it's not my problem. I didn't say you ever said anything.
I did admit being wrong about that. No idea what you're talking about.
 
Yeah, all those people were referring to unknown German soldiers from 200 years ago.

Anyway before this turns into a link battle and I get bored, clearly people here compared Trump directly to Hitler. No question about that. Been bothering me since the first time I saw someone deny it happened.
Cheetohllini is better tho. More accurate both in physical description and as a comparison to a fascist.

Whatever dude. You like to nitpick so you can be right. That's fine.
Doesn't change anything if I'm wrong about that aspect of it unless you really think all those people were referring to old German soldiers just for the fun of it.

I wasn't talking to you so why would anything I post contradict you?
The other guy said they didn't reference Hitler when they quite obviously did. You wanna take something else from that it's not my problem. I didn't say you ever said anything.
I did admit being wrong about that. No idea what you're talking about.

You did?

I must have missed it. Can you point it out in your posts above?

:rolleyes:
 
Acceptance by cucks already enshired seems to be going not so well...

Best suck up even more to the Blurt Bitches themselves.
 
You did?

I must have missed it. Can you point it out in your posts above?

:rolleyes:

You missed the part where I said if I was wrong it still doesn't change what people were talking about? That was like half the post.
It's got nothing to do with anything. You wanna be right. Ok. I really don't know if you are or not but I'll assume you are because that seems to be the best bet at the moment from your post altho to be fair you didn't include the sauce but I don't play that game. I tend to believe stuff like that unless it's obviously bogus.
I suppose you will take exception the word "if." Whatever. It refers to not having the sauce and is just plain english. Nitpick on it if you want. No skin off my balls. I don't mind being wrong. It's how you learn. Sometimes.
 
You missed the part where I said if I was wrong it still doesn't change what people were talking about? That was like half the post.
It's got nothing to do with anything. You wanna be right. Ok. I really don't know if you are or not but I'll assume you are because that seems to be the best bet at the moment from your post altho to be fair you didn't include the sauce but I don't play that game. I tend to believe stuff like that unless it's obviously bogus.
I suppose you will take exception the word "if." Whatever. It refers to not having the sauce and is just plain english. Nitpick on it if you want. No skin off my balls. I don't mind being wrong. It's how you learn. Sometimes.

So in your mind, saying "if I'm wrong" is an admission of being wrong? and then following it up with:
You wanna be right. Ok. I really don't know if you are or not

ok, player...

I bet you're a real hit with sexual partners with those communication skills!

I don't "wanna be right", I am right. I posted evidence backing it up, and then you come with some half-ass line about "if I'm wrong".

You haven't learned by being wrong in this case, clearly.
 
So in your mind, saying "if I'm wrong" is an admission of being wrong? and then following it up with:

ok, player...

I bet you're a real hit with sexual partners with those communication skills!

I don't "wanna be right", I am right. I posted evidence backing it up, and then you come with some half-ass line about "if I'm wrong".

You haven't learned by being wrong in this case, clearly.

No it's just you doing your thing. Don't bother me none. I said I was wrong about that part. Not gonna keep saying to boost your ego.
 
Here. I"m not a fan of wiki but whatever.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Führer

Führer was the unique name granted by Adolf Hitler to himself, in his function as Vorsitzender (chairman) of the Nazi Party.


As a political title it is most associated with the Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler, who was the only person to hold the position of Führer.

There, since you missed it the first time. If people genuinely compare him to Hitler, they're morons. If people read into it more than they should, they are also stupid. I don't mind being argued with but at least have your shit in line before you step to me.
 
No it's just you doing your thing. Don't bother me none. I said I was wrong about that part. Not gonna keep saying to boost your ego.

You didn't say you were wrong, you said "If I'm wrong" and then you doubled down on it in your last post before the one I'm quoting now.

You know you're wrong, but you have trouble admitting it. That's not my problem, as I said, it's yours.

Good luck with it.
 
Back
Top