Trump would 'love to see a shutdown' if Democrats don't get behind his immigration pl

Well, it's about time slavery came back to the US. Let's see… which group of people will be in the minority soon?

Yes, white male Repugnicans could be sent to re-education camps where they would be stripped of their guns and electronic devices and forced into physical training. Those who survived the transition from their former virtual world could be sold on-line and used for agricultural and janitorial jobs.

We would need to split them up from their families in order to ensure that they remain compliant. We could justify all of this by pointing out how it supports the economy.

After all, as Bob Balouski pointed out, slavery is the historical way of life in North America.
 
Sometimes I get the impression that Trump is in way over his head and has no idea what he's doing.then again what do I know? I'm new here.
 
Sometimes I get the impression that Trump is in way over his head and has no idea what he's doing.then again what do I know? I'm new here.

The more you say that the more obvious that it is thats you not.
 
Looks like the Dems were not wiling to call his bluff. They folded their cards. Why?
 
Yes, white male Repugnicans could be sent to re-education camps where they would be stripped of their guns and electronic devices and forced into physical training. Those who survived the transition from their former virtual world could be sold on-line and used for agricultural and janitorial jobs.

We would need to split them up from their families in order to ensure that they remain compliant. We could justify all of this by pointing out how it supports the economy.

After all, as Bob Balouski pointed out, slavery is the historical way of life in North America.

Just when I thought that you could get no more insane. You boggle my mind!
 
Heh.

Rand Paul will vote for the tax cuts but won't vote for the funding bill. Surprise. Not.

:rolleyes:
 
Heh.

Rand Paul will vote for the tax cuts but won't vote for the funding bill. Surprise. Not.

:rolleyes:

What part of lowering tax burdens in a way that is either revenue neutral or deficeit increasing, justifies a wild spending spree?

Just because both sides of the aisle snuffled up to the feeding trough in a bipartisan way doesn't make the bill automatically acceptable.

That said, I'm not so sure that the compromises made which increased the spending bill aren't necessary as a pragmatic political reality but I'm certainly not happy with the level of spending.

If you could wave a wand and cut out some of the things that you do not support to get that spending down would you not wish to do that?

I realize that my query is rather fanciful as there is no magic wand.

I have no idea where you stand on for example military spending but I would suspect that you would be more dovish than this particular budget. I love watching fighters screaming overhead which I enjoy regularly out here. I still think that even just the military portion this budget is kind of obscene.
 
Just when I thought that you could get no more insane. You boggle my mind!

He keeps shouting into the interweb about others only existing in the virtual world. I picture him as pajama boy after the third week of the Charles Atlas mail-order course.
 
:rolleyes:

The tax cut bill is not revenue neutral by any stretch of the imagination.

Republicans lost any and all rights to stand on that soap box.

Pass the damn bill and keep the fucking government open.

Simple as.
 
Both are just trying to keep their base happy. This was a good compromise. Neither side got exactly what they wanted. But instead...we now have a shutdown.
 
Both are just trying to keep their base happy. This was a good compromise. Neither side got exactly what they wanted. But instead...we now have a shutdown.

One key difference I see is that Pelosi isn't standing directly in the way of the government staying open. Whereas Paul is.
 
Have you ever criticized the republicans? If so, can you link to it?

Because it seems that 99% of the time, you're only complaining about Ds...

That makes you just another typical "not-Republican" on here.

Yes, I spent a lot of time doing it when the cries of woe were coming from the (R)'s. Eight years bashing Tea Party Ted's all come back crying about a communist ninja in the WH coming to get grandma with socialism in the middle of the night....you'll see it again. Shit some of them STILL have me on iggy LOL

But right now it's all "Trump is totally like Hitler and literally an autocratic fascist dictator!!" and it will be that brand of stupidity I swat and laugh at for years to come.

So be mad that I'm calling (D)'s out for their hypocrisy and crying about now they aren't the ones getting to sell out the US working class like do when they are in power.

No angry right winger claims to be a Republican any more. Starting with the early days of talk radio, they ate away like sulfuric acid at "liberals", "progressives", Democrats, "feminazis", and "Ds" for years, and then started in on their own party, going after Ryan and McConnell.

All that remains are neo-Nazi types, basement trolls, and Repugnicans, sucking up to their Stable Genius, but often even denying that they voted for him.

That's because republicans keep looking more and more like the exact same shit as Democraps.

Ever wonder why voting for Obama got you Romneycare anyhow?

Of course not you're too stupid and partisan to question that, you'll take any shit chips (D)'s flick your way with a smile won't you?
 
Last edited:
One key difference I see is that Pelosi isn't standing directly in the way of the government staying open. Whereas Paul is.


How do you figure?

When (R)'s were doing exactly what Pelosi is doing in 2013 concerning funding ACA they were horrible horrible obstructionist who hated veterans, grandma and wanted to stop the ultra benevolent, greatest, most wonderful HC system ever! Obamacare.

Now that the tables have turned and Pelosi and the (D)'s are engaging in the EXACT same "I want my special bullshit or no deal!" behavior as the obstructionist party of no just a few years ago, she somehow isn't standing directly in the way of the government staying open?

So ONCE AGAIN, it's ok just as long as it's a (D) doing it!

LOL, fuckin' amazing partisanship and epic hypocrisy I'll give you that.
 
Last edited:
How do you figure?

When (R)'s were doing exactly what Pelosi is doing in 2013 concerning funding ACA they were horrible horrible obstructionist who hated veterans, grandma and wanted to stop the ultra benevolent, greatest, most wonderful HC system ever! Obamacare.

Now that the tables have turned and Pelosi and the (D)'s are engaging in the EXACT same "I want my special bullshit or no deal!" behavior as the obstructionist party of no just a few years ago, she somehow isn't standing directly in the way of the government staying open?

So ONCE AGAIN, it's ok just as long as it's a (D) doing it!

LOL, fuckin' amazing partisanship and epic hypocrisy I'll give you that.

She was talking about what Pelosi did yesterday. I know it is difficult for you. Try to keep up. Bottom line...the govt will shut down. This one...is 100% on the back of the Republican Party
 
This statist federal government shutting completely down could absolutely do no greater favor for America's original political future.

#ShutItDown = #BringItDown
 
She was talking about what Pelosi did yesterday. I know it is difficult for you. Try to keep up. Bottom line...the govt will shut down. This one...is 100% on the back of the Republican Party

He's not even sure what thread he's in or what he's responding to most the time. At least I hope that's the case.
 
She was talking about what Pelosi did yesterday.


I understand and recognized that in my post if you care to read it.

Bottom line...the govt will shut down. This one...is 100% on the back of the Republican Party

How is this 100% on the back of the Republican party?

When the roles were reversed and it was the (R)'s refusing to cooperate with Obama in 2013 it was their fault for shutting down, they were the un-American obstructionist party of NO!

So now that (D)'s are being the un-American obstructionist party of NO, behaving exactly like the (R)'s were in 2013, it's suddenly now the (R)'s fault???

I know it is difficult for you. Try to keep up. Bottom line...all the (D)'s and their fans who were pissed at obstructionist (R)'s for pulling the same shit (D)'s are doing right now clearly have no political ideological consistency, you are all basic and brainless partisan lemmings.
 
Last edited:
He's not even sure what thread he's in or what he's responding to most the time. At least I hope that's the case.

Oh look Luke either has shit reading skills like Dribble or is just as big of a (D) fanboy.

Shocking. :rolleyes:
 
You know...BB...you show yourself to be more and more like the original BB everyday. Let me break it down for you shall I? There was a compromise bill in place. There were enough votes from both sides of the aisle to pass it. Yet, only one side of the aisle has decided to derail it. Which side was that?
 
To be honest BB...I have you on ignore so I have to actually click the read post icon. I openly admit to not reading most of your crap. It is painful to read. I am embarrassed because I know our educational system failed you. That...shouldn't happen. I apologize for our system failing you.
 
Oh look Luke either has shit reading skills like Dribble or is just as big of a (D) fanboy.

Shocking. :rolleyes:

Oh, look. BB the definitely NOT republitard defending the republicans again whilst dissing the Dems and totally not being a partisan hack.

:rolleyes:
 
Back
Top