Trump...WTF?

[KingOrfeo]

I have never read the name Hillary and the word moderate in the same sentence before...that just doesn't pass the straight face test.

She ain't no lefty, not even as much as Sanders. She's solidly with the discredited pro-corporate, Wall Street, neoliberal, free-trade, Washington Consensus view of political economy, not much distinguishes her from the Pubs in that regard but a friendlier view of the welfare state. She's maybe five degrees to the left of Bill at most, and there ain't no other word than "moderate" for Bill.

The "center" is nowhere near where you seem to think it is.

 

[BotanyBoy]

She ain't no lefty, not even as much as Sanders. She's solidly with the discredited pro-corporate, Wall Street, neoliberal, free-trade, Washington Consensus view of political economy, not much distinguishes her from the Pubs in that regard but a friendlier view of the welfare state. She's maybe five degrees to the left of Bill at most, and there ain't no other word than "moderate" for Bill.

The "center" is nowhere near where you seem to think it is.

ROMNEY was further left than Clinton LOL

I have never read the name Hillary and the word moderate in the same sentence before...that just doesn't pass the straight face test.

(D) doesn't mean lefty.

The only thing 'left' about clinton is her desire for more dead cops at the hands of BLM and to bring in as many ISIS operatives into the country totally unsupervised as possible.

 

[LadyVer]

As to what the hell Tromp really thinks about woman or anything else... who knows? He likes to mouth off a lot like a teenager off with his buddies and no girls around.

But That may well be the least of it.

POTUS gets to nominate the SCOTUS candidates that will effect the history for the next twenty to fifty years else I wouldn't give care much one way or the other.

Who knows??? Right.

 

[FGB]

She ain't no lefty, not even as much as Sanders. She's solidly with the discredited pro-corporate, Wall Street, neoliberal, free-trade, Washington Consensus view of political economy, not much distinguishes her from the Pubs in that regard but a friendlier view of the welfare state. She's maybe five degrees to the left of Bill at most, and there ain't no other word than "moderate" for Bill.

The "center" is nowhere near where you seem to think it is.

Actually, when I take one of the test, to my annoyance, I score as a moderate liberal and lean more toward Democratic than Republican.

Yes,I know.

I mutter under my breath an say a few bad words every time...
And trust me Hillary waaaay to the fuck left of me.

 

[FGB]

Who knows??? Right.

( I worry the S.O.B. might really be Crackers!)

 

[LadyVer]

( I worry the S.O.B. might really be Crackers!)

So, let me ask you this. There is the so called perfect conservative female presidential candidate. Would you have a problem with her repeatedly saying men are only good for one thing, and if men are too ugly or fat, they don't even qualify for that? Not only that, she says everyone else believes the way she does about men. And you would vote for her?

 

[underguy1]

Donald Trump Calls on Russia to Find Hillary Clinton’s Missing Emails Scintilla enough for you?

Nope. That piece is laughable nonsense from a couple of bought and paid for hacks.

If you take that sort of drivel seriously, I don't think we can converse.

 

[underguy1]

You will never live to see a POTUS who is not pro-Israel.

Just accept it.

Never.

 

[underguy1]

But he does it in front of open mics on national television while running for president. He just doesn't care, not even the way a teenage boy would care if his mother were in the room.



And Clinton would appoint experienced federal judges, moderate enough to have a chance of being confirmed by a Pub-majority Senate or surviving a Pub filibuster in a Dem one. Trump more likely would appoint the sort who are to lawyers as Harold Bornstein is to doctors.

He's not supposed to win.

You don't get it.

 

[Raziel83]

Nope. That piece is laughable nonsense from a couple of bought and paid for hacks.

If you take that sort of drivel seriously, I don't think we can converse.

That link has a video of him saying “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing, I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

Heck, you can find the same video from different sourced if you don't want to click on that link so I don't get it why you don't believe what Trump is saying.

 

[Hypoxia]

Nope. That piece is laughable nonsense from a couple of bought and paid for hacks.

He was recorded at a press conference by actual microphones. He said those words. In most countries, that would be High Treason.

If you take that sort of drivel seriously, I don't think we can converse.

I'm sorry your alternate universe isn't working out.

 

[underguy1]

That link has a video of him saying “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing, I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

Heck, you can find the same video from different sourced if you don't want to click on that link so I don't get it why you don't believe what Trump is saying.

I don't think you understand the point.

The Clinton campaign's cheating is the issue.

Who or what exposes it is irrelevant.

And Trump knows full well that the Russians didn't hack her.

He's trying to lose.

 

[underguy1]

He was recorded at a press conference by actual microphones. He said those words. In most countries, that would be High Treason.

I'm sorry your alternate universe isn't working out.

No it wouldn't dude.

In most countries Hillary and her campaign staff would be in gaol for electoral fraud.

 

[JackLuis]

German economic ministry: A Trump presidency would destroy the US economy

Germany’s economy ministry believes a Donald Trump presidency would severely damage the U.S. economy, according to an internal memorandum reported by Der Spiegel magazine on Saturday.

The ministry expects “shrinking gross domestic product, fewer jobs and higher unemployment,” in the United States if the Republican candidate were to implement his campaign pledges, the magazine cited the memo as saying.

Trump, a billionaire businessman seeking his first public office, has proposed tax cuts worth $4.4 trillion and wants to curb government regulation and take a tougher stance on negotiating trade deals.

He says his economic plan would produce annual economic growth of 3.5 percent and create 25 million jobs over a decade. But some economists have questioned the assumptions underpinning the plan.

Trump’s pledges are “not feasible”, Spiegel cited the memorandum as saying. Moreover, the plans would violate international or U.S. law and could be “no basis for a realistic economic policy.”

Trump's fatal flaw is that he is an four star asshole who has no idea how to run a business, much less a country.

 

[Hypoxia]

Lawsuit: Donald Trump Is the Illuminati King

Donald Trump is a communist, a member of the New World Order, and may have been tangentially involved in a plot to use wireless brainwave technology to coerce a Disney World alligator into killing a toddler—if the lawsuits against him are to be believed, that is.

Is truth stranger than fiction?

 

[phrodeau]

Hillary Clinton is ripping jobs outs of this country,” said Trump. “That’s how she gets rich...we will end Clinton corruption.

Must be because fewer jobs are being created by the ultra-rich people draining their accounts in order to fund her campaign.

It makes no sense otherwise. The lady is unemployed at the moment.

 

[sr71plt]

Would this be the same Trump who has businesses based abroad? And, yes, as Hillary Clinton holds no government or business sector job, what jobs is this that she's ripping out of the United States? What is unfathomable is how Trump supporters can believe such crap. She was being kind by suggesting that only half of them were a basket full of deplorables.

 

[IrreverentRev]

What I think I understand

Does the U.S. government send jobs overseas? Yes and no.
Why? Yes, due to contractors fulfilling obligations. No. Companies send jobs overseas to help their bottom line and to become more competitive.
North America Free Trade Act (NAFTA) for example, Eliminated tax on imports to help improve finances of poorer countries and to help reduce immigrants by providing more job. It wasn't intended to be used by US companies to reduce their costs.

Do regulations harm business? Yes and No.
Why? Yes, it does cost businesses money to change how they do things. For example, for a chemical plant to add scrubbers it costs money. However, buying the scrubbers will add new jobs for the company that produces them. The regulation in and of itself was created because acid rain was damaging to water supplies and to that nice paint job you car has.
No. It depends on the regulation. For example, OSHA safety standards actually reduced the monies companies paid for insurance.

Is the government responsible for companies cutting jobs? No.
Why? It remains the sole responsibility of the companies themselves. If a company adds automation, it will reduce the number of employees. If a company is not seeing the profit margin that it wants, it may cut jobs. However, doing so is a self inflicted wound, depending on the companies size. Once you start cutting jobs just to increase profits, you are also reducing your customer base. Now you may ask, what about the Coal industry? The answer is still no. even though the US government is pushing for renewable energy, it is the Coal industries fault for not looking for other uses for coal.

Will building a wall prevent illegals from entering the US? Yes and No.
Why? Yes. Once a wall or fence is built it can cause people to rethink crossing. No. For example, China built the great wall to prevent Mongol hoards from invasion. It failed. Just because the Great Wall of china failed to do its job, doesn't mean the US, Mexica wall will fail. Sorry, but it will fail. If Mexico was to build the wall then they will no doubt use Mexican labor. DO you really think that having 100k Mexicans working on the boarder will mean none of them will come across?

 

[phrodeau]

http://www.courthousenews.com/2016/09/30/for-trump-border-wall-key-to-curbing-heroin-epidemic.htm

BEDFORD, N.H. (CN) - Donald Trump offered up his solution to New Hampshire's growing heroin epidemic at a rally on Thursday, calling it the "single biggest problem" facing the Granite State.

Trump vowed that enhanced border security, a key campaign issue for the GOP nominee, will stem the flow of drugs into the United States.

"We're going to build that wall, and we're going to stop that heroin from coming in," he promised over chants of "Build that wall!"

Heroin is produced from opium, is grown almost exclusively in Afghanistan and Myanmar, and enters the US from Canada.

 

[sr71plt]

Oh, you haven't heard about the wall that's going to be built on the Canadian border? Canada's going to pay for that wall, you know.

 

[Porkwarrior]

...North America Free Trade Act (NAFTA) for example, Eliminated tax on imports to help improve finances of poorer countries and to help reduce immigrants by providing more job. It wasn't intended to be used by US companies to reduce their costs...

/QUOTE]

Yeeeeeeah. You have no clue. Zero. None.
I didn't bother reading the rest of your post because I'm sure the rest was even worse blather.

NAFTA eliminated duty between Canada, US, and Mexico. It benefited the Mexicans & US corps the most, but it should be there, and it should stay there. If you buy a boat in Canada or a washing machine from Mexico, why should you pay extra straight into gov't coffers for it? Jobs didn't leave Canada & the US for Mexico with NAFTA, even the chinese offshore their shit now.

 

[FGB]

So, let me ask you this. There is the so called perfect conservative female presidential candidate. Would you have a problem with her repeatedly saying men are only good for one thing, and if men are too ugly or fat, they don't even qualify for that? Not only that, she says everyone else believes the way she does about men. And you would vote for her?

I would consider voting for OBAMA before I voted for Hillary.

Yeah, I said it.

( That's weird, I've never heard thunder from a clear sky before!)

 

[LadyVer]

I would consider voting for OBAMA before I voted for Hillary.

Yeah, I said it.

( That's weird, I've never heard thunder from a clear sky before!)

Ok, so you would vote for a male Democrat who doesn't call men or women offensive names, over a female conservative who calls men disgusting pigs. Got it.