ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 50,989
Of courseIt is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of courseIt is.
Ahahaha.If we give nato the finger we don't have to do WW3. They can rescue themselves this time. They are oh so superior to the USA in EVERY WAY!!! Been looking down their noses at us for decades.
We should take our F-22's and LEAVE.
Extremes are extreme.
That's why they are defined as such.
You're not refuting my statement.
No they hurt my pocket book you fucking retard.....do they not teach you how to read English up in Frenchy fuckistan??Ahahaha.
Did europe hurt your fee fees, lil bobo?
I never said they were.Sure, but opposed to one another =/= extreme.
you are attempting to argue that you are correct and I am wrong.Refutation isn't my intent. Explaining why I'm correct about being "either or" on some things was.
I never said they were.
you are attempting to argue that you are correct
and I am wrong.
Whether you understand that as being an attempt to refute my statements is a matter of education of terminology rather than an argument. Feel free to grab a dictionary.
Nope. You're spinning yourself into more stupid maybe go back and read words again.So you were just sperging out on the word "extreme" ....ok.
That's not my position. You don't seem to understand moderates.Yes.
Only if your position is that things can't be "either or".
LolNo....feel free to shove a dictionary up your ass.
Yup.Nope.
You're spinning yourself into more stupid maybe go back and read words again.
That's not my position.
You don't seem to understand moderates.
Lol
You argue until you don't even know what you're arguing.
Nope.Yup.
LolI'm not the one sperging out and then pretending it never happened.
LolOh so then I wasn't saying you were wrong.
LolNo I understand there are confused morons out there who haven't figured it out yet.
Ignoring actual ideological definitions doesn't make you correct. It just makes you an idiot.I wasn't arguing. Try to keep up kid.
Nope.
Lol
Lol
Lol
Ignoring actual ideological definitions doesn't make you correct. It just makes you an idiot.
Moderates not being part of your ideological spectrum is a personal reality that doesn't exist outside of your brain.
If you can't understand ideological spectrums that flow across multiple perspectives, then that is your issue. It is not you being correct.I didn't ignore it or say they aren't part of the ideological spectrum....confused fuckwits are totally a thing.
Nope
I do understand.If you can't understand ideological spectrums that flow across multiple perspectives, then that is your issue. It is not you being correct.
NopeYEUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUP!
Yes, I get you're confused. Nothing is either or. Everything person shares values on every spectrum to some degree.I do understand.
No I'm correct that some things are "either or".
As stated earlier, not everything is on or has a spectrum of it's own. Some things are "either or" binaries.
Nope
Yes, I get you're confused. Nothing is either or.
English mother fucker do you speak it??Everything person shares values on every spectrum to some degree.
Ahahaha, did they now? Your pocket book and your fee fees. lolNo they hurt my pocket book you fucking retard.....do they not teach you how to read English up in Frenchy fuckistan??
God damn 3rd worlders.
Nope.Yup, you are confused.
Everything is.English mother fucker do you speak it??
No, not everything is on a spectrum.
NopYUUUUUUUUP!
47 doesn't actually make you credible.Maga horseshit
Adding - the reasons they are called extreme is because they are the furthest on either side of the spectrum. Moderates are in the middle of that spectrum.YUUUUUUUUP!
Europe is under no illusions at all about what the USA would do about any conflict in Europe. The USA would stay out of it for as long as possible making as much money as possible selling arms. In WWI the USA's first armed involvement was delayed until 3.5 years into a 4 year war. In WWII UK fought mostly alone for 2.5 years and saw off any invasion threat. Henry Ford like many others was still making a buck; he last sold war materiel to Hitler in December 1943. Eventually The Red army ensured the downfall of Hitler, At the Battles of Kursk in July/August 1943 there was more men and more armour in conflict than in all the rest of the battles of the entire war put together. The Western front after D day was important, but US troops were still a minority even in that theatre. Then Hollywood got hold of the narrative and re-wrote history.If we give nato the finger we don't have to do WW3. They can rescue themselves this time. They are oh so superior to the USA in EVERY WAY!!! Been looking down their noses at us for decades.
We should take our F-22's and LEAVE.
Nop
47 doesn't actually make you credible.
Adding - the reasons they are called extreme is because they are the furthest on either side of the spectrum.
Moderates are in the middle of that spectrum.
Confusion isnt actually a part of the spectrum
Europe is under no illusions at all about what the USA would do about any conflict in Europe. The USA would stay out of it for as long as possible making as much money as possible selling arms.
In WWI the USA's first armed involvement was delayed until 3.5 years into a 4 year war. In WWII UK fought mostly alone for 2.5 years and saw off any invasion threat. Henry Ford like many others was still making a buck; he last sold war materiel to Hitler in December 1943. Eventually The Red army ensured the downfall of Hitler, At the Battles of Kursk in July/August 1943 there was more men and more armour in conflict than in all the rest of the battles of the entire war put together. The Western front after D day was important, but US troops were still a minority even in that theatre. Then Hollywood got hold of the narrative and re-wrote history.
Umm....inBut it's funny, which is the point.
Left and right extremes are on the same spectrum as moderatesBut they aren't. That's why they aren't always extreme.
Yes, certain aspects of left and right overlap.Free speech and censorship for example .....neither is necessarily extreme in any way, but they are 100% opposed ideologically.
Again - you thinking they aren't on the spectrum because you believe they are confused is irrelevant to the fact that everyone is on the left-rigjt spectrum. A moderate can have unique extreme views and an extreme left or right leaning person can have unique moderate views. It's the combination of political views to explain the positioning.Moderates are generally confused wishy wash don't really know what their talking about fence riders. Until I see them behave differently I have no reason to believe otherwise.
?? Sure.Umm....in
Left and right extremes are on the same spectrum as moderates
Yes, certain aspects of left and right overlap.
I understand you want to believe that moderates aren't confused while also calming everything is a spectrum and everything is totally overlapped and compatible.Again - you thinking they aren't on the spectrum because you believe they are confused is irrelevant to the fact that everyone is on the left-rigjt spectrum. A moderate can have unique extreme views and an extreme left or right leaning person can have unique moderate views. It's the combination of political views to explain the positioning.