Us and Israel attack Iranian regime

[latecomer91364]

They have. But the goals are DIFFERENT every time they are stated.

You are undeniably an idiot. They have not. You're purposely mistaking temporary, tactical goals in a fluid situation for the mission goal.

I'd like to give you the credit for knowing the difference, but still lying about it - but I can't commit to estimating that level of intelligence for a dumbfuck like you.

The basic mission goals have still not changed, jackass.

 

[Wilson23]

You are undeniably an idiot. They have not. You're purposely mistaking temporary, tactical goals in a fluid situation for the mission goal.

The MISSION GOAL keeps changing. Regime change, or what?

 

[Iluv17]

More devistati9n..BQQM

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116224324444349237

 

[Philthy_Phil]

 

[Wilson23]

View attachment 2602938View attachment 2602938

NOW Tucker decides to despise chickenhawks!

 

[Rebel5soul]

Kharq Island is being prep'd. Move, counter move. Control of Kharq is total control of Iran's economy. How Trumpian can you get?

 

[schism666]

Kharq Island is being prep'd. Move, counter move. Control of Kharq is total control of Iran's economy. How Trumpian can you get?

you were more fun when you'd get drunk and fight with sean on friday nights

 

[Iluv17]

Boom Boom BOOM!

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2026/03/14/livewire-operation-epic-fury-day-fifteen/

 

[Iluv17]

 

[RobDownSouth]

The propaganda machine is in overdrive for the past 24 hours.
The new catchphrase is "Short Term PAIN for Long Term GAIN"
Quite jingoistic, methinks

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram

 

[ll74]

View attachment 2603081View attachment 2603082

So we will "keep the strait open" and also, other countries are sending ships to get the strait open.

Dude contradicts himself in one statement.

 

[Raazor]

View attachment 2603081View attachment 2603082

Trump can fuck off. The US can send its own ships to sort it out.

 

[Iluv17]

Trump can fuck off. The US can send its n/

 

[Iluv17]

Because they are ALL a total waist of good skin! TRUTH

 

[Rightguide]

Trump calls out NY Times and the Wall Street Journal for reporting anti-American lies about the Iran war:

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116227789768118115

 

[ll74]

Trump calls out NY Times and the Wall Street Journal for reporting anti-American lies about the Iran war:

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116227789768118115

The administration has lied and been opaque about the current war.

The press is doing their job.

 

[Rightguide]

I think it's highly probable we are going to see limited boots on the ground. Now that all military targets have been hit on Kharg Island. I think it's highly likely we're going to see the 82nd Airborne and a Marine MEU assault and seize the island. That's likely how Trump is going to control the oil flowing from Iran.

 

[ll74]

I think it's highly probable we are going to see limited boots on the ground. Now that all military targets have been hit on Kharg Island. I think it's highly likely we're going to see the 82nd Airborne and a Marine MEU assault and seize the island. That's likely how Trump is going to control the oil flowing from Iran.

"Limited"

What does this mean?

 

[Rightguide]

I've learned more about Iran and military air defense in the past two weeks than I have in my whole life.

I didn't know that Iran was made up of basically 5 "tribes"

• The Persian/Farsi majority - clustered in Teheran
• The Western Kurds
• The Northern Kurds
• The Southwestern Arabs
• The African-Persians (extreme south)

The Teheran Persians are by far the most "liberal" of the five (relatively speaking) they are far more educated and cultured than the rest of the country. Remember those pictures of the Iranian women wearing miniskirts in the 1970s and not wearing veils? That was these folks. The rest of the country has "wealth envy". Ironically, if America or genocidal Israel takes out "liberal" Teheran, the southwesten Arabs (aka the suicide bombers) will take over.

The African-Persians are the descendants of the Iranian slave trade that was outlawed 900 years ago, they have an enclave about 30 cities are live the closest to the Straits of Hormuz. When Trump decided to commit a war crime, he issued an illegal order to blow up the African-Persians only desalinization plant (his hatred towards Africans transcends his need to be a "war hero"). (Destroying access to water is a Geneva Convention war crime, which war criminal Netanyahu swore to mushbrain was easy to circumvent)

The Geneva Conventions and their additional protocols do prohibit intentionally attacking civilian objects indispensable to survival, such as water supplies, if the purpose is to deny civilians those resources. However, the same law also recognizes several realities of warfare. A facility can become a legitimate military target if it is being used for military purposes. Dual-use infrastructure (power plants, bridges, communications systems, water systems) may be attacked if it provides a concrete military advantage. The legal test involves military necessity, proportionality, and intent. So, merely saying “a water facility was hit” does not automatically equal a war crime under the Geneva framework. All of which you conveniently failed to mention, but then again, you are who you are.

 

[DeluxAuto]

The Geneva Conventions and their additional protocols do prohibit intentionally attacking civilian objects indispensable to survival, such as water supplies, if the purpose is to deny civilians those resources. However, the same law also recognizes several realities of warfare. A facility can become a legitimate military target if it is being used for military purposes. Dual-use infrastructure (power plants, bridges, communications systems, water systems) may be attacked if it provides a concrete military advantage. The legal test involves military necessity, proportionality, and intent. So, merely saying “a water facility was hit” does not automatically equal a war crime under the Geneva framework. All of which you conveniently failed to mention, but then again, you are who you are.

Does blowing up a girls' school and massacring 160 children count as a war crime, Jack?

 

[DeluxAuto]

Trump calls out NY Times and the Wall Street Journal for reporting anti-American lies about the Iran war:

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116227789768118115

Which of those do you believe are lies?

 

[Rightguide]

"Limited"

What does this mean?

It means in comparison to say Desert Storm which featured a much larger force structure, involving approximately nine U.S. divisions. Including the 1st Infantry, 1st Armored, 3rd Armored, 24th Infantry, 1st Cavalry, 82nd Airborne, 101st Airborne, and the 1st and 2nd Marine Divisions. Here we are talking about elements of the 82nd Airborne Division and a Marine Expeditionary Unit which is basically a reinforced Battalion. So, we're talking roughly 10,000, more or less, total as compared to 560,000 in Desert Storm.

 

[Nicefella]

The Geneva Conventions and their additional protocols do prohibit intentionally attacking civilian objects indispensable to survival, such as water supplies, if the purpose is to deny civilians those resources. However, the same law also recognizes several realities of warfare. A facility can become a legitimate military target if it is being used for military purposes. Dual-use infrastructure (power plants, bridges, communications systems, water systems) may be attacked if it provides a concrete military advantage. The legal test involves military necessity, proportionality, and intent. So, merely saying “a water facility was hit” does not automatically equal a war crime under the Geneva framework. All of which you conveniently failed to mention, but then again, you are who you are.

It is also very convenient to fail to mention that we have zero accountable non-spin evidence that the school that was recently attacked (with the children/school girls) by Israel was remotely “attached” to a military operation.

The alleged proportionality doctrine you seem to spew simply doesn’t hold water with these set of facts. I remind you that the other stories (it was a mistakenly and/or intentionally fired by the Iranians) and/or it was a mistake by the US have also been debunked.

This was a ruthless calculated firing, and sadly, no one will give a shit about it when all of this has been whitewashed through the mainstream media cycles.

 

[ll74]

It means in comparison to say Desert Storm which featured a much larger force structure, involving approximately nine U.S. divisions. Including the 1st Infantry, 1st Armored, 3rd Armored, 24th Infantry, 1st Cavalry, 82nd Airborne, 101st Airborne, and the 1st and 2nd Marine Divisions.

So "limited" is which divisions.

Got it.

Here we are talking about elements of the 82nd Airborne Division and a Marine Expeditionary Unit which is basically a reinforced Battalion. So, we're talking roughly 10,000, more or less, total as compared to 560,000 in Desert Storm.

How many is the max acceptable limit for you?

Is it based on number of troops or duration of deployment?

What happens if the regime turns back to massacre of its citizens? What happens when they pull more weapons from underground to attack neighbors in the region?

 

[Rightguide]

It is also very convenient to fail to mention that we have zero accountable non-spin evidence that the school that was recently attacked (with the children/school girls) by Israel was remotely “attached” to a military operation.

The alleged proportionality doctrine you seem to spew simply doesn’t hold water with these set of facts. I remind you that the other stories (it was a mistakenly and/or intentionally fired by the Iranians) and/or it was a mistake by the US have also been debunked.

This was a ruthless calculated firing, and sadly, no one will give a shit about it when all of this has been whitewashed through the mainstream media cycles.

I quoted the law, nothing more. Rob simply misread the known facts and made a categorical claim that doesn’t hold up. That’s the only point I addressed. War is hell, and innocents die; to expect otherwise is to mistake tragedy for criminality and confuse the brutal reality of war with a simplistic moral fable. The law, codified in instruments like the Geneva Conventions, recognizes that distinction, which is precisely why accusations of war crimes require evidence and legal thresholds, not just indignation. Calling something a war crime doesn’t make it one. It requires proof of intent, military context, and legal analysis, none of which were offered, only asserted.