Venezuela

[Chadrone]

$3+ billion dollars for your boy.

In welfare?? Or was there some actual substance to it unlike the wealth redistribution scams you, the pirates in MN and the the rest of the "Third world FIRST!! FUCK AMERICA!!" Democrats support?

 

[Rotadom]

Taking out terrorist doesn't become a crime because you support the terrorist over the USA.

No need to justify, there was no crime.

I do not support the terrorist, you dumb .

 

[Chadrone]

I do not support the terrorist, you dumb .

So then why does orange man taking some out have you and the rest of the left losing your fucking minds????

This is as dumb as when you idiots say you don't support open borders or illegals while trying to convince us a wife beating human trafficker is SAINT MARYLANDMAN!!!! and screaming "NO HUMAN IS ILLEGAL ON STOLEN LAND!!" like a bunch of fucking retards.

"Queers for Palestine" needs you for another protest.....run along, you know you need the 200 bucks.

 

[Rebel5soul]

In five mins, will you tell us that it's about something else?

I introduced the Monroe Doctrine VERY EARLY in this thread. You need to see someone about your short term memory loss. You're exhibiting early signs of dementia.

 

[ll74]

I introduced the Monroe Doctrine VERY EARLY in this thread. You need to see someone about your short term memory loss. You're exhibiting early signs of dementia.

You will.

Fun

 

[Rotadom]

So then why does orange man taking some out have you and the rest of the left losing your fucking minds????

That's not anyone if upset about, moronic .

You're exhibiting early signs of dementia.

You thought DOGE was going to save America and not be a failure within 8 months.

 

[Rightguide]

That's not anyone if upset about, moronic .

You thought DOGE was going to save America and not be a failure within 8 months.

Unveiling USAID’s inefficiencies and halting questionable activities is a victory in itself. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) may not have transformed the entire federal bureaucracy overnight, but exposing wasteful practices, especially within the sprawling Democrat funding conspiracy named USAID (AidToUs), and putting a stop to those questionable activities has to be considered a tangible, meaningful win.

 

[Rotadom]

and putting a stop to those questionable activities has to be considered a tangible, meaningful win.

You bought something for a billion and sold for a million and you think you made a profit. Lol .

 

[Rebel5soul]

Got another one last night. Boom, boom, boom, out go the lights.

 

[Rightguide]

You bought something for a billion and sold for a million and you think you made a profit. Lol .

BS. Their work enabled Trump to fire thousands of useless bureaucrats feeding like vampires off the taxpayer.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Unveiling USAID’s inefficiencies and halting questionable activities is a victory in itself. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) may not have transformed the entire federal bureaucracy overnight, but exposing wasteful practices, especially within the sprawling Democrat funding conspiracy named USAID (AidToUs), and putting a stop to those questionable activities has to be considered a tangible, meaningful win.

What needs to happen is for ALL funding to NGO's, foreign or domestic, be cut off. ALL OF IT!!!!!!

 

[Rightguide]

What needs to happen is for ALL funding to NGO's, foreign or domestic, be cut off. ALL OF IT!!!!!!

Agreed. We also need a vast DOJ investigation of those NGOs and who is behind them.

 

[Rotadom]

BS. Their work enabled Trump to fire thousands of useless bureaucrats feeding like vampires off the taxpayer.

I know you're a willfully uninformed but you realize they had to beg thousands of employees to come back to work because they grossly miscalculated, right?

 

[Rebel5soul]

I know you're a willfully uninformed but you realize they had to beg thousands of employees to come back to work because they grossly miscalculated, right?

Begged? Fuck you moron.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Federal Workforce Reduction 2025.

Notadom slips on the shit he spews.........................again.

 

[icanhelp1]

Unveiling USAID’s inefficiencies and halting questionable activities is a victory in itself. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) may not have transformed the entire federal bureaucracy overnight, but exposing wasteful practices, especially within the sprawling Democrat funding conspiracy named USAID (AidToUs), and putting a stop to those questionable activities has to be considered a tangible, meaningful win.

And DOGE is still very active behind the scenes. Could be an invaluable asset during budget formation especially in the realm of data processing upgrades, streamlining government processes and improving accuracy, all big money savers.

 

[Rotadom]

Federal Workforce Reduction 2025.

Notadom slips on the shit he spews.........................again.

You poor drunk . Nowhere in your article does it say how many were hired back. You ran with a headline that fit your narrative and it blew up in your face

 

[Rightguide]

I know you're a willfully uninformed but you realize they had to beg thousands of employees to come back to work because they grossly miscalculated, right?

Show me.

 

[Rotadom]

Show me.

You're joking, right?

 

[Rotadom]

Like the 26 J Doe from USAID that are now fired again?

Federal Workforce Reduction 2025.

Notadom slips on the shit he spews.........................again.

Show me.

You're joking, right?

Here's one of the MAGAt s admitting they were hired back.

And then inefficiently fired again.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Here's one of the MAGAt s admitting they were hired back.

And then inefficiently fired again.

That ended that conversation with the quickness.

 

[Hel_Books]

What war crimes? He didn't say it was wrong, he said it wasn't law. If a sub launches a torpedo at a frigate and it doesn't sink even if there is enemy in the water the rules of engagement is to continue to fire until the threat is eliminated. . . .

You can't be serious. Before the destruction of the boat, the Trump administration had no evidence that the boat was smuggling drugs. You may claim they did, but if they did, they would have released it, don't you think? In any case, criminals are stopped and arrested, not killed out of hand, that's called an extrajudicial killing (making Trump, Hegseth etc. murderers). If you claim these people on little boats hundreds of miles from the USA are military combatants, then you're being even sillier than if you claim they're smugglers. But let's pretend these few people in this small boat are on a mission to attack the USA like the way the US Marines landed in Nicaragua in 1912. So a USA drone blows up the boat, leaving wreckage and survivors floating in the sea. It's a war crime to send more strikes to kill these survivors. That's why in later strikes the USA military picked up the survivors, rather than killing them.

And in a further demonstration that the people in the boats weren't criminals, the USA military returned these people to their home countries instead of hauling them into court!

 

[Rebel5soul]

You can't be serious. Before the destruction of the boat, the Trump administration had no evidence that the boat was smuggling drugs. You may claim they did, but if they did, they would have released it, don't you think? In any case, criminals are stopped and arrested, not killed out of hand, that's called an extrajudicial killing (making Trump, Hegseth etc. murderers). If you claim these people on little boats hundreds of miles from the USA are military combatants, then you're being even sillier than if you claim they're smugglers. But let's pretend these few people in this small boat are on a mission to attack the USA like the way the US Marines landed in Nicaragua in 1912. So a USA drone blows up the boat, leaving wreckage and survivors floating in the sea. It's a war crime to send more strikes to kill these survivors. That's why in later strikes the USA military picked up the survivors, rather than killing them.

And in a further demonstration that the people in the boats weren't criminals, the USA military returned these people to their home countries instead of hauling them into court!

We in the international community noticed that upon the first survivor going over the side of the Bismark the Royal Navy immediately ceased fire and began survivor rescue operations..............right? RIGHT? RIGHT?????

Nope, none of that happened. They ceased combat operations when the fucking ship rolled over and sank. And we, likewise, ceased operations after the boat AND its cargo were destroyed.

So just shut the fuck up with your mealy mouthed bullshit, you are ignorant beyond comprehension.

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
Apparently not, according to this:

Nine people died in the first strike on the vessel and two survivors were left clinging to the burning wreckage when it was struck again, killing them, according to the Washington Post. A US official has said four missiles were used in the operation.

The Trump administration has not denied there were survivors and has insisted the strikes on 2 September were "in accordance with the law of armed conflict".

Ahh, so the boat AND its cargo were still afloat. Boom, boom, boom, out go the lights.

So the Trump people won't pick up survivors unless they've been underwater for a while? But wouldn't that mean they weren't survivors any more?

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
If you disagree with someone's politics and they tell you it's raining, all the screaming you might do that the sun is shining (when it isn't) won't make the rain stop. You've agreed that the boat was blown up by a drone from the USA military, with a follow-up strike that killed two people clinging to wreckage floating in the sea.

The Law of War Manual used by your own country explains on page 453, “After each engagement, parties to the conflict shall, without delay, take all possible measures to search for and collect the wounded, sick, and shipwrecked at sea, to protect them against pillage and ill-treatment, to ensure their adequate care, and to search for the dead and prevent their being despoiled.”

• Because they are not lawful combatants, they lose the combatant privilege (which protects lawful combatants from criminal prosecution for mere participation in hostilities). Guide Humanitarian Law+2Casebook+2

Make up your mind. Are they enemy "soldiers" that you can kill without trial (of course, even if they are enemy combatants, it's a war crime to kill them when they're shipwrecked and clinging to wreckage floating in the sea) or are they criminals? But criminals, of course you can't just kill out of hand, you have to arrest them and try them in court, because if you just kill them out of hand, you're committing murder.