Walker Has No College Degree...

[unregistered]

 

[KingOrfeo]

As I said before, another form of totalitarianism, like our Democrat liberalism has morphed into.

Except that our present political-economic system bears no resemblance to Nazi Germany's as described above, and neither does anything the Democrats would like to put in place. We could use a bit of dirigisme, actually, but we haven't got it and are not likely to get it.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Elizabeth Warren: "If Scott Walker sees 100,000 teachers & firefighters as his enemies, maybe it's time we take a closer look at his friends."

 

[BotanyBoy]

"Hitler's views on economics, beyond his early belief that the economy was of secondary importance, are a matter of debate. On the one hand, he proclaimed in one of his speeches that "we are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system"

The first sentence is a self serving attempt move away from socialism by the author, whoever that is. If he opposed capitalism, what other system could he possibly embrace except command order economics? The real difference between Hitler's National Socialism and Stalin's Communism, is that although Hitler allowed for the ownership of the means of production to remain in private hands, the state owned all that was produced. A bit more efficient than communism generally, in that some incentive to produce outside of the gun barrel to the head, remained in Hitler's system.

Jesus christ in a bucket you're dumber than all dog shit.

Do you just wake up "I HATE so-shall-izum sooooo mcuh....I hate it so much everything I simply don't like/agree with from now on shall be extreme leftist socialism, even when it's not!!" or were you just born this ate the fuck up?

 

[Boxlicker101]

Elizabeth Warren: "If Scott Walker sees 100,000 teachers & firefighters as his enemies, maybe it's time we take a closer look at his friends."

He doesn't see them as enemies, but as opponents or obstacles. The union bossed want to run the state and plunder the treasury for billions, and the governor doesn't want them to do either.

 

[CandiCame]

How the hell did y'hall get from internet provider regulation to Hitler? That seems like a wild ride.

 

[Boxlicker101]

How the hell did y'hall get from internet provider regulation to Hitler? That seems like a wild ride.

What internet provider reg? This thread is supposed to be about the education or lack of same of WI governor and possible presidential candidate Scott Walker.

 

[CandiCame]

What internet provider reg? This thread is supposed to be about the education or lack of same of WI governor and possible presidential candidate Scott Walker.

My bad. I opened a bunch of tabs and got confused. Nevermind. The question was stupid and therefore can't be answered.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

He doesn't see them as enemies, but as opponents or obstacles. The union bossed want to run the state and plunder the treasury for billions, and the governor doesn't want them to do either.

I'll call for a cite on that one.

 

[miles]

He doesn't see them as enemies, but as opponents or obstacles. The union bossed want to run the state and plunder the treasury for billions, and the governor doesn't want them to do either.

No need to look any further than Chicago if you want to see what unions can do.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

No need to look any further than Chicago if you want to see what unions can do.

You get a city with 31 Fortune 500 companies.

 

[Busybody]

You get a city with 31 Fortune 500 companies.

downgraded to JUNK and close to BK

 

[Boxlicker101]

I'll call for a cite on that one.

Okay. Here are some citations, some of them from the primary opponent or obstacle:

http://www.seiu.org/2011/03/the-short-unhappy-governorship-of-scott-walker.php

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3126042/posts

http://www.wsj.com/articles/political-diary-scott-walker-winsagain-1406921198

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...s-protest-outside-scott-walkers-parents-home/

http://wcmcoop.com/2015/02/21/scott...unions-in-2011-prepared-him-to-take-on-putin/

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Okay. Here are some citations, some of them from the primary opponent or obstacle:

http://www.seiu.org/2011/03/the-short-unhappy-governorship-of-scott-walker.php

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3126042/posts

http://www.wsj.com/articles/political-diary-scott-walker-winsagain-1406921198

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...s-protest-outside-scott-walkers-parents-home/

http://wcmcoop.com/2015/02/21/scott...unions-in-2011-prepared-him-to-take-on-putin/

Read the 1st article and this nothing in there about teachers and firefighters wanting billions.

 

[unregistered]

 

[BotanyBoy]

Hey truth is "leftists" have murdered more people than any other political persuasion.

What's that got to do with the fact you think ISIS, a fiercely right wing and devoutly religious group of folks, is a LW organization just because you are SO politically biased you literally just assign "LW socialism" to anything you simply don't like?

And that's not true either...you're just a biased shit bird who can't back that claim up if you wanted to.

Who cares, overeducated arrogant asshats got us into this mess.

Of course none of them were republicans, I'm sure.

The real, the practical, spectrum places total government (totalitarianism) on the extreme left, no government (anarchy) on the extreme right. Communism, Socialism, Nazism, are all totalitarian command order systems.

Your conventional Faux spectrum is designed by academe to mask the relationship of modern liberalism to totalitarianism, especially Nazism. However, a true spectrum reveals the real truth, that totalitarianism is a single characteristic of the left with different names and aspects. Just as today's liberal has no relationship to the classical liberals who founded this country, your faux political spectrum has no relationship to the political reality of today.

And just what is the "TRUE!!" spectrum according to vetteman?

Because I'm pretty fucking sure you're in the micro fringe minority of ultra partisan and highly biased RW dip shits with this big steaming pile of bullshit.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Or what's left of the Rust Belt.

That math doesn't work out either.

 

[unregistered]

 

[BotanyBoy]

We know that the two political extremes are total government (no freedom) and anarchy (no government and total freedom).

No we don't know....this is a vetteyism...this is YOUR OPINION, YOUR PERSPECTIVE.

That is not a concrete and absolute law of reality....you pompous fucking ass.

Why is it not logical to judge degrees of government restraint between these two extremes?

Because not everything falls into that narrow 2D perspective you have just arbitrarily decided is the fabric of reality for everyone.

LvR is NOT as simple as Tyranny V Freedumb and pure freedom is in the best interest for all like vettey has decreed.....

I know you think your 50's 5 min 5th grade anti commie propaganda film was the final fucking word on political law but it's just not that simple.

I'll tell you why, it's because you don't like the company you have to keep in the spectrum.

Oh and now you are assigning me my friends/peers....anything else GOD?? YOu want to decide what kinda underwear I'm wearing? How about what color car I drive?? Maybe what I'll eat for dinner??

Well Mr.KnowAll??

 

[unregistered]

 

[Sean Renaud]

If you don't think those are the two political extremes, that all political ideas and actions fall between their limits, you're simply to damn stupid to talk to. It's simple logic, nothing pompous about it, you pitiful little brain fart.

Except the real world isn't that simple. There is a lot of room to move around in various ways that shuts down your black and white.

For the record, proud of the company I keep, in the magical world where my choices are Nazis and Libya it's not a hard choice. One place is a terrible hell hole with a stable government and economy, the other is a terrible hell hole that is going to shift radically from day to day.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Sean Renaud]

So tell us which political system doesn't fall between those two extremes.

Every single one. Your two extremes are set completely arbitrarily with no relationship to reality. Where would you place Iran (Strict religious and social controls), Cuba (Strict economic controls), the US (fairly strict religious controls but few economic ones.) Just off the top of my head. There are different brands of "totalitarians" and judging them on a simple black to white scale does nothing for their differences. I would happily have no religious restrictions save don't hurt anybody economic, not so much. We need economic controls from the government.

 

[BotanyBoy]

If you don't think those are the two political extremes, that all political ideas and actions fall between their limits, you're simply to damn stupid to talk to. It's simple logic, nothing pompous about it, you pitiful little brain fart.

"If you don't agree with me I don't want to talk to you!!*insert 3rd grader name calling*"

Yea got it there Mr.Rational Righty.... jesus fucking christ.

It's simple allright...but it's not logic.

No there isn't anything pompous about the political concept. The fact that you arbitrarily define everyone's reality/perspective as absolute and whatever the fuck you decree it is and just ride the iggy horse when they disagree with you, is totally fucking pompous and arrogant.

Yea....you REALLY are that big of a partisan dickhead.

The real political spectrum is not as simple as L= tyranny R=freedumb.....Mr.I love huge government spending and oversight/control so long as it's MY version of it.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Every single one. Your two extremes are set completely arbitrarily with no relationship to reality. Where would you place Iran (Strict religious and social controls), Cuba (Strict economic controls), the US (fairly strict religious controls but few economic ones.) Just off the top of my head. There are different brands of "totalitarians" and judging them on a simple black to white scale does nothing for their differences. I would happily have no religious restrictions save don't hurt anybody economic, not so much. We need economic controls from the government.

VetteBigot's very narrow view of the world fails to take into account that there are both Conservative (religious) and Liberal (communist) totalitarian forms of government.

In his tiny little brain anything resembling a totalitarian government MUST be liberal because reasons...