Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You realize thousands of subscribers dropped their subscriptions when Bezos disallowed any op-eds critical of Trump right?It never happened. The Washington Post laying off 300 people from “non-productive cost centers” is a fascinating development for a company whose core business model lately seemed to be producing certainty, instead of revenue. Turns out “democracy dies in darkness” doesn’t pay the electric bill when darkness stops clicking.
The real problem with a propagandistic business model is that it assumes ideology can substitute for customers. You can shame readers, scold them, lecture them, and tell them they’re morally obligated to subscribe, but eventually someone in accounting notices that virtue signaling has a negative ROI. Ads don’t run on righteousness, and payroll can’t be met with gaslighting editorials.
When your newsroom is structured less like a business and more like a graduate seminar in politically correct opinions, the first thing to get cut isn’t bias, it’s headcount. And suddenly, the same institution that insisted markets don’t matter is discovering, with great surprise, that markets matter a lot. Propaganda is a fantastic business model, as long as taxpayers, donors, or billionaires are footing the bill. The moment actual customers are required, the Washington Post discovers the ultimate hater: reality, which refuses to like, share, or subscribe.
You do realize they are ALL going bye-bye! Trump hasn't even started yet! Every single day will be having you fools play defense! Every day now until your party of perverts and cannibals is GONE! TRUTHYou realize thousands of subscribers dropped their subscriptions when Bezos disallowed any op-eds critical of Trump ri
So yeah. Bezos destroyed the Washington Post the same way Musk destroyed Tesla. By alienating their customers.
Nothing ever came of those QAnon promises before. Why do you believe them now?You do realize they are ALL going bye-bye! Trump hasn't even started yet! Every single day will be having you fools play defense! Every day now until your party of perverts and cannibals is GONE! TRUTH
First, Bezos didn’t “ban op-eds critical of Trump.” The Post ran years’ worth of anti-Trump coverage, news, opinion, editorials, cartoons, the whole marching band. If anything, the paper’s brand problem wasn’t silence; it was monotony. When every op-ed sounds like the same graduate seminar footnote, people stop paying, not out of protest, but boredom.You realize thousands of subscribers dropped their subscriptions when Bezos disallowed any op-eds critical of Trump right?
So yeah. Bezos destroyed the Washington Post the same way Musk destroyed Tesla. By alienating their customers.
From what year are you dating the novelty? How was the WaPo Bezos bought any different from what it was in the Nixon years?The uncomfortable truth is simpler: The Post didn’t lose readers because it strayed from propaganda. It lost them because propaganda is a weak business model once the novelty wears off.
Real journalists are needed on conservative news outlets, yes; but keep in mind that real journalists fact-check their sources, verify their information, and dont post false, misleading, or speculative (and often times, quickly debunked) ideas as facts.There's no room for left-wing activists when real journalists are needed on conservative news outlets.
Conservative news outlets have no USE for real journalists. That's why you never see any on Fox.There's no room for left-wing activists when real journalists are needed on conservative news outlets.
I wasn’t around for the Nixon years, but looking back, two facts seem hard to ignore: the Washington Post was at its commercial and journalistic peak during that era, and today it’s in unmistakable decline. So the difference from the Nixon years isn’t that the Post became critical of a president. It’s that it moved from investigation to interpretation, from breaking news to breaking alignment. In the ’70s, readers subscribed to learn what happened. Lately, they’re asked to subscribe to confirm what they already believe. The novelty didn’t disappear in a single year; it decayed as soon as dissent stopped being informative and started being repetitive. When journalism trades truth for political advocacy, it divides its audience and drives many to seek honesty elsewhere.From what year are you dating the novelty? How was the WaPo Bezos bought any different from what it was in the Nixon years?
You have no reason to believe that ever happened.It’s that it moved from investigation to interpretation, from breaking news to breaking alignment.
This is like the US imposing sanctions on countries it doesn't like, then after many years of no spare parts for their vehicles or industry, no oil, no ability to exchange currency etc, the RW announces that 'socialism doesn't work'.You realize thousands of subscribers dropped their subscriptions when Bezos disallowed any op-eds critical of Trump right?
So yeah. Bezos destroyed the Washington Post the same way Musk destroyed Tesla. By alienating their customers.
Amazing how "real journalists" suddenly become invisible the moment inconvenient facts show up. Fox has plenty of reporters doing the hard work, just because you disagree with their perspective doesn’t mean they’re not journalists. Real journalism isn’t about echo chambers; it’s about covering stories that matter to your audience. Maybe the real issue isn’t the presence of journalists, but your expectation that everyone reports the left's narrative.Conservative news outlets have no USE for real journalists. That's why you never see any on Fox.
Why else would it lose so much of its customer base?You have no reason to believe that ever happened.
Same reasons as every other print newspaper. The Washington Times isn't doing any better, is it?Why else would it lose so much of its customer base?
Studies have shown regular viewers of Fox know less about public affairs than people who watch no news at all.Amazing how "real journalists" suddenly become invisible the moment inconvenient facts show up. Fox has plenty of reporters doing the hard work, just because you disagree with their perspective doesn’t mean they’re not journalists.
Oh, you mean the ever-deceasing literacy rate affecting people educated in school systems and universities dominated by left-wing professors and teachers? They get all the credit.Same reasons as every other print newspaper.
Real journalism isn’t about echo chambers;
Show us those studies and their sources.Studies have shown regular viewers of Fox know less about public affairs than people who watch no news at all.
No, it's mainly the cost of newsprint, which online sources don't need.Oh, you mean the ever-deceasing literacy rate affecting people educated in school systems and universities dominated by left-wing professors and teachers? They get all the credit.
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opini...g-fox-cnn-highlights-cable-tvs-harm-rcna23620Show us those studies and their sources.
Will Lewis was handpicked by Jeff Bezos to be designated hit man at the Washington Post.Lewis, ever the gracious Brit, framed his departure as a noble sacrifice “in order to ensure the sustainable future of The Post.” Sure, Will – because nothing says “sustainable future” like firing a third of your workforce and then bailing before the pitchforks come out. Also the news that he was at the Super Bowl after the biggest mass termination in WaPo history probably didn’t help.
https://economiccollapse.report/was...er-quits-as-newspaper-implodes-in-epic-chaos/
Looks like the CIA will have to find another Misinformation Base to operate from.
WTF?! This is a new CT -- the CIA funds the Post?!house of CIA-funded cards collapses.