whiskeytangofoxtrot
Slut Guru
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2015
- Posts
- 2,077
Haven't seen, read or heard from a real journalist on a conservative news outlet.There's no room for left-wing activists when real journalists are needed on conservative news outlets.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haven't seen, read or heard from a real journalist on a conservative news outlet.There's no room for left-wing activists when real journalists are needed on conservative news outlets.
Well said!!!!Real journalists are needed on conservative news outlets, yes; but keep in mind that real journalists fact-check their sources, verify their information, and dont post false, misleading, or speculative (and often times, quickly debunked) ideas as facts.
In other words, having more real journalists on conservative news outlets will help dispel a lot of the garbage and misleading propaganda masquerading as "News" that gets pushed out on these outlets. Because many of the "journalists" on these outlets today are not real journalists. They are propagandists, with no obligation to report factual information.
You have no idea who I am, nor any knowledge of my personal or professional record, which, incidentally, is unblemished. What you’re offering isn’t insight; it’s speculation driven by emotion. And despite the confidence, it remains thoroughly uninformed.Will Lewis was handpicked by Jeff Bezos to be designated hit man at the Washington Post.
He might be one of the few human beings alive with less of a moral compass than you.
He's neither "gracious" or "noble".
He's slimy......I don't say this lightly: "Slimier than you".
You gloat over the Post laying off 300 journalists. That alone makes you worthless.You have no idea who I am, nor any knowledge of my personal or professional record, which, incidentally, is unblemished. What you’re offering isn’t insight; it’s speculation driven by emotion. And despite the confidence, it remains thoroughly uninformed.
This got more media coverage than the other 30K Amazon layoffs.Washington Post announces sweeping layoffs as it scales back news coverage
Danielle KayeBusiness reporter
The Washington Post has announced it is laying off one-third of its work force, sharply scaling back the paper's coverage of sports and foreign news.
The cuts, announced on Wednesday, will impact employees across departments with roles in the newsroom's sports, local and foreign sections hit particularly hard.
It marks the latest upheaval for the leading US newspaper, which is owned by billionaire Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon.
Executive editor Matt Murray said the cuts would bring "stability". But the announcement was met with condemnation from the paper's employees and some former leaders, one of whom described it as among the "darkest days in the history of" the storied newspaper.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyn05d1494o
Gloating would imply I misunderstood what happened. I didn’t. Pointing out that a failing business finally closed its museum of outdated roles and unrecoverable costs isn’t cruelty, it’s literacy. If recognizing the difference between journalism and payroll bloat makes someone “worthless” in your worldview, that says far more about your grasp of economics than it does about my character. The above is you confusing empathy with denial, and accountability with malice.You gloat over the Post laying off 300 journalists. That alone makes you worthless.
Doesn't need to, if Bezos runs WaPo the way Trump would want if he thought about it.
Studies have shown regular viewers of Fox know less about public affairs than people who watch no news at all.
Not every job has the same dress.code.as.yoir job cleaning the shitters.Just saw a clip about the WaPo. Lots of wild-eyed effeminate men in skinny jeans with big leather purses leaving the building that Jeff Bezos bought to "save democracy." The problem is he's also a businessman. He spent a lot of money trying to be cool.
EXACTLY what I was.talking about! You ad NOTHING to the conversation, NOTHING!Not every job has the same dress.code.as.yoir job cleaning the shitters.
Are you upset because you also clean out shitters?EXACTLY what I was.talking about! You ad NOTHING to the conversation, NOTHING!
Are you upset because you also clean out shitters?
How many times have you been banned from the forum?
My perspective on the layoffs are not part of this thread because this thread is meant to rail on journalists. I don't do that
IncorrectThey aren't journalists
Also incorrect, they are CIA operatives!
What was that you said again?At least the majority are! That should tell you all you need to know! End of conversation!
EXACTLY what I was.talking about! You ad NOTHING to the conversation, NOTHING!
How many times have you been banned from this forum?They aren't journalists, they are CIA operatives! At least the majority are! That should tell you all you need to know! End of conversation!
Watch the traditional "Schools of Journalism" begin losing applicants. The catechism of advocacy is catching up with them.'I was just laid off in the middle of a WAR ZONE': Distraught Washington Post journalist blasts paper for firing her while she sheltered in Ukraine
Corporate media is losing market share because it is contemptuous of customers and staff. It treats employees like shit because it is shit. People have finally noticed the smell and are flushing it away.
And ever since then "journalist's" have been trying to replicate that window in time, and not just the Post.In 1973 The Washington Post turned a burglary at the Watergate Building into a scandal that destroyed the presidency of a man who had a year earlier been reelected by a landslide.
If The Washington Post had recently been operating at that level of competence, we would know who committed statutory rape at Epstein Island. Their careers would be over. Many of them would be in prison. Even if Donald Trump was not one of the statutory rapers he would be incapable of ruling.
In 2025 Trump is more vulnerable to a career destroying scandal than Nixon was in 1973. Journalists should be finding who committed statutory rape at Epstein Island, naming them, and publishing the proof.And ever since then "journalist's" have been trying to replicate that window in time, and not just the Post.
Really? I don't think you know what brought Nixon low.In 2025 Trump is more vulnerable to a career destroying scandal than Nixon was in 1973. Journalists should be finding who committed statutory rape at Epstein Island, naming them, and publishing the proof.
What did?Really? I don't think you know what brought Nixon low.
Cheating at the game. He could get away with anything else.Really? I don't think you know what brought Nixon low.