Watch a Pussy Republican Coward Turn Tail and Run Like a Little Bitch!

[KRCummings]

If he didn't fight in it, I take that as evidence he didn't support it. And unless some one finds something more compelling to show other wise, I am going to have to stand by that.

I'm still trying to figure out your logic here. Are you saying that only those that fight in a war can support it? I don't get that. It's really dumb.

 

[cats]

As a Republican student activist Tancredo spoke in support of the Vietnam War. After graduating from the University of Northern Colorado he became eligible to serve in Vietnam in June 1969. Tancredo has said he went for his physical, telling doctors he had been treated for depression, and eventually got a "1-Y" deferment.

You know what happens when you ASSume right?

Yes and so do you.

So you just said he went in to get a physical to join the military answered honestly and was then disallowed. That is one angle I could look at it, but no I have to agree with you. You have the best evidence.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Tancredo approves of Dachau photos at anti-health care reform rallies

"You Bet!"

 

[cats]

I'm still trying to figure out your logic here. Are you saying that only those that fight in a war can support it? I don't get that. It's really dumb.

No not what I was saying. I am saying some one who doesn't fight in a war is more likely to not support that war. I then went on to say the side with the best evidence is the one I will support.

I am sure you'll find this consistent with my last post.

 

[Sean]

Yes and so do you.

So you just said he went in to get a physical to join the military answered honestly and was then disallowed. That is one angle I could look at it, but no I have to agree with you. You have the best evidence.

How many poor kids do you think avoided Viet Nam because they'd once suffered from depression?

The point is, however, that Tancredo claimed to be speaking for veterans. When confronted with an actual veteran, he ran like the fucking coward he is.

 

[LeJacguelope]

Yes and so do you.

So you just said he went in to get a physical to join the military answered honestly and was then disallowed. That is one angle I could look at it, but no I have to agree with you. You have the best evidence.

Yes in UD's demented little world, not knowing if he tried to get a deferment, or just answered the question honestly and whether he liked it or not, he was disallowed, makes no difference. Trifle the little details like knowing the truth. It makes UD feel like a big bad super soldier to trash the man since he has an R next to his name.

 

[KRCummings]

No not what I was saying. I am saying some one who doesn't fight in a war is more likely to not support that war. I then went on to say the side with the best evidence is the one I will support.

I am sure you'll find this consistent with my last post.

What I'm finding so far is that you're not very bright. How the hell do you figure something like that? It doesn't make sense.
Far more people don't fight in wars than do yet many wars have enjoyed popular support. Probably most wars, at least in the beginning.
I fail to see how you can say that if someone doesn't fight in a war then they are more likely to not support it. It sounds like something you just made up.

 

[cats]

Yes and so do you.

So you just said he went in to get a physical to join the military answered honestly and was then disallowed. That is one angle I could look at it, but no I have to agree with you. You have the best evidence.

How many poor kids do you think avoided Viet Nam because they'd once suffered from depression?

The point is, however, that Tancredo claimed to be speaking for veterans. When confronted with an actual veteran, he ran like the fucking coward he is.

Did you actually read my post. I agree with you and you question it?

 

[cats]

What I'm finding so far is that you're not very bright. How the hell do you figure something like that? It doesn't make sense.
Far more people don't fight in wars than do yet many wars have enjoyed popular support. Probably most wars, at least in the beginning.
I fail to see how you can say that if someone doesn't fight in a war then they are more likely to not support it. It sounds like something you just made up.

No I probably am not to bright because I am loving this thread, despite the attacks.

So what you are saying is that most people who are pro war and able to fight choose not to fight?

 

[Sean]

No I probably am not to bright because I am loving this thread, despite the attacks.

So what you are saying is that most people who are pro war and able to fight choose not to fight?

No. Most people that are pro war are pro as long as THEY don't have to fight it.

 

[KRCummings]

No I probably am not to bright because I am loving this thread, despite the attacks.

So what you are saying is that most people who are pro war and able to fight choose not to fight?

There are many reasons to support a war but not fight. You are looking at it very narrowly.
And supporting a war does not always make one pro-war. Most people hate war even when allowing that one is necessary.

 

[cats]

There are many reasons to support a war but not fight. You are looking at it very narrowly.
And supporting a war does not always make one pro-war. Most people hate war even when allowing that one is necessary.

Well thought out response. Now apply the looking at it broadly to my previous statment. Doesn't it logically make more sense, that when one doesn't believe in a fight that they don't fight?

No. Most people that are pro war are pro as long as THEY don't have to fight it.

That question wasn't directed at you, but any input is welcome.

 

[KRCummings]

. Doesn't it logically make more sense, that when one doesn't believe in a fight that they don't fight?

.

Yes, that makes sense. However the reverse doesn't and that was your argument.

 

[cats]

Yes, that makes sense. However the reverse doesn't and that was your argument.

Was it? Can you find that as my first argument?

 

[KRCummings]

Was it? Can you find that as my first argument?

You said that if one doesn't fight then they must not believe in it not that if one doesn't believe in then they dont' fight.
Your first argument doesn't hold up because many people believe in something they don't actually do but few actually do something they don't believe in.

Now I'm sota bored with you so I'll be moving on.

 

[cats]

I retract these statments.

 

[Drixxx]

I retract these statments.

You don't see comments like this often. Refreshing.

 

[busybody..]

Want to see a liberal make a Republican wet his pants, cry like a baby, then run away like the cowardly pussy he is? Check this out. The fun starts at about 2:55.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7IY1wQDkWU



http://blogs.westword.com/demver/tom%20tancredo%20screen%20capture.jpg

you are a PUSSY for not apologizing for the Sparkman thread

 

[busybody..]

This is a REAL PUSSY


Obama is really CLUELESS

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yesterday the Moonbat Messiah turned stomachs with his inappropriate demeanor when he gave a jaunty "shout-out" to "Congressional Medal of Honor winner" Joe Medicine Crow before belatedly getting around to delivering his obligatory words of regret over Religion of Peacenik Nidal Malik Hasan's horrific killing spree.


However, NewsBusters informs us that Joe Medicine Crow, said to be the last living Plains Indian war chief, didn't even win the Congressional Medal of Honor, but the Medal of Freedom.

Chairman Zero awarded it to him himself just last August. But medals and stuff are all kind of the same to a community organizer.

 

[busybody..]

Congressman Connolly (D-VA) has a bully in his office shoving women
Yesterday, Teri Christoph, Co-Founder and Executive Director of Smart Girl Politics-and a good friend of mine-answered the call by Rep. Michele Bachmann to the people to converge on Washington, D.C. and talk to representatives about the Pelosi Healthcare bill.

After several rousing speeches by the likes of John Voit, Mark Levin and Missouri's very own Todd Akin (R-MO) the crowd was dispersed. All were encourage to go visit their Representatives so they could speak directly to them about their feelings on the disastrous legislation. (Teri recounts the whole story here, be sure to read it.)

As all the constituents did, Teri went through security, camera in hand and in full view, then proceeded to Congressman Gerry Connolly's office. Once in the office she filled out the visitors form, pulled out her camera and began asking for Rep. Connolly or a staffer to discuss the representatives position on the healthcare bill. It is at this point things got a little ugly-while the staffer seems to indicate that in order to use a camera in the office she must have media credentials-which is weird, I would like to see where that is written-but then Communications Director George Burke came out and decided he would take control. He became aggressive toward Teri, insisting she would need press credentials, shoving her aside and threatening to call police.

So, it seems Rep. Gerry Connolly has a thug in his office to do his communicating for him. George Burke is a known instigator and has been out on the Internet threatening and trying to quash those with opposing points of view for years. Since sometime in 2006 there are numerous examples of Mr. Burke posting comments on Internet sites and blogs under his name and two pseudonyms one "Thomas Paine" or "Thomas Paine Patriot" and then later under the name "11thCD". Lowell has done all the work and lined it out very neatly for all the world to see-except I guess Rep. Connolly. Otherwise, why would some one who has regularly compared people to NAZI's, and Stalinist's be allowed to serve as Communications Director for a Representative of the people. Clearly this man will not tolerate opposing points of view and feels neither he, nor Connolly, owes anyone any explanation for anything. Nice communicating dude.

It would seem Representative Connolly has a habit of hiding though. This past summer he refused to hold an "open" townhall to speak to his people about their concerns on healthcare. Rather, he spoke to a captive, hand-picked audience so he wouldn't have to drag out his nasty attack dog or answer any tough questions.

Folks in the House like this better get a clue....your seat is not guaranteed and if this is how you will treat the people you represent, you will be voted out.