We need MORE CO2

[HisArpy]

Look the damn word up I mentioned in my comment. It’s even mentioned in von Bismarck’s link. Jesus fucking Christ. It has a name other than water poisoning/intoxication. Basically, you’re diluting the sodium from the body affecting the process of osmosis. Low sodium in the body causes cells to swell. Dangerous if their brain cells. But there’s something in the water y’all are drinking if you can’t pick up on the fact I used the technical name for it.

Kant, Kant, Kant... don't you know by now that if any of the usual suspects say you're wrong; then you're wrong? Even if you're right, you're wrong because they have so decreed.

Personally, I think it's because their eyes glaze over after the third word in any sentence and then they forget the first 3 words so they totally have to wing it from there.

 

[von_Bismarck]

No surprise, given the reasons that *your* previous incarnations (in the admited members of the "von_Bismark" family tree) were banned.

You really should remove yourself from polite society and the board even if, as you claim, you are merely the several posters that you have openly admitted to being.

And what reasons are those? Be specific.

 

[adrina]

Brawndo's got electrolytes.

 

[von_Bismarck]

Brawndo's got what plants crave.

 

[zipman]

https://cdn.foodbeast.com/content/uploads/2015/01/boxed-wine.jpg

I love reading an Ishfail Franzia rant.

They are so entertaining.

 

[Que]

I love reading an Ishfail Franzia rant.

They are so entertaining.

I just love watching people not clever enough to think up their own insults repeating an especially lame insult as if it is clever. That's lame, twice removed.

How uncreative do you have to be to accuse Ish of being a drunkard with the box-wine trope?

The man DISTILLS HIS OWN high-quality, high-proof whisky. This has been confirmed by one of the board's actual alcoholics. This is what is known as "low hanging fruit." This stuff writes itself, yet you incompetent trolls can't take 2 and 3 and puzzle out 5 or 6.

SMDH at how astonishingly bad you persistent trolls are at your chosen avocation.

"The best insults are minted from the truth." Me, paraphrasing Bronzeage

 

[jaF0]

 

[Que]

And what reasons are those? Be specific.

I am sure you are pretty familiar with what you wrote for the express purpose of being instantly banned. Given that *you* spent a decade and a half duplicating Rob's obsessive archive of board posts, you should be able to find that sort of material for your masturbatory purposes.

You know, the sort of thing that Rob stopped writing that he used to obviously relish in great, creepy detail before it became clear that his obvious predilictions were going to get him banned if he kept it up on the one login he treasures. Good thing for him, and his obvious predilictions, that right at the time that he quit posting such cringe-worthy posts, he was able to sate his need for such material by reading the screeds created by the surge of quickly-banned, not-at-all-Rob sock-puppets that popped up at coincidently that time.

You know, that sort of thing.

I'm sure, given your fan-boy status of Rob posts and the fact that you were the one that got banned for those sort of reasons you have a very good idea of exactly what I am not talking about, creep.

 

[von_Bismarck]

I am sure you are pretty familiar with what you wrote for the express purpose of being instantly banned.

I'm afraid that's slipped my memory. Remind me? Be specific.

 

[zipman]

I just love watching people not clever enough to think up their own insults repeating an especially lame insult as if it is clever. That's lame, twice removed.

How uncreative do you have to be to accuse Ish of being a drunkard with the box-wine trope?

The man DISTILLS HIS OWN high-quality, high-proof whisky. This has been confirmed by one of the board's actual alcoholics. This is what is known as "low hanging fruit." This stuff writes itself, yet you incompetent trolls can't take 2 and 3 and puzzle out 5 or 6.

SMDH at how astonishingly bad you persistent trolls are at your chosen avocation.

"The best insults are minted from the truth." Me, paraphrasing Bronzeage

It's so cute the way you rush in to defend him. No matter how stupid the comment, at least he can count on you.

Who knew you were a white knight?

 

[Que]

Kant, Kant, Kant... don't you know by now that if any of the usual suspects say you're wrong; then you're wrong? Even if you're right, you're wrong because they have so decreed.

Personally, I think it's because their eyes glaze over after the third word in any sentence and then they forget the first 3 words so they totally have to wing it from there.

To wit:

They aren't hard to befuddle. Compound sentences defeat them, and heaven offend if you leave out a comma needed to delineate a subordinate clause (or the actual parenthesis helpful for the slow to recognize when a parenthetical aside is being made.)

I cannot possibly keep track of the numerous occasions when I have been wrongly accused of constructing what they claim to be a run-on sentence for no other reason than their inability to follow a sentence that has a number of prepositional phrases, subordinate clauses, and adverbial modifiers (not to mention the aforementioned parenthetical asides) that they adjudge to be evidence of a run-on sentence for no other reason than the fact that they felt the need for a snack and perhaps a small nap before the reached the eventual end of the sentence that so taxed their rather limited powers of comprehension.

 

[Que]

It's so cute the way you rush in to defend him. No matter how stupid the comment, at least he can count on you.

Who knew you were a white knight?

Speaking of limited powers of comprehension.^

Nothing in my post "defended" Ish from your slur. Your slur was that he is a drunkard. I neither supported nor disputed your idiocy. What I suggested was that if you wanted to make that slur, there was much richer material for you to mine. Not that you are smart enough, or creative enough to do so, even when (as I just did) someone draws you a picture.

I cannot imagine that Ish would need me to "rush in" to defend him from a dullard like you. You didn't even create the insult yourself. Ish, I'm reasonably sure, has you quite sensibly on ignore. If not. He just ignores you the old-fashioned way. I doubt you have noticed, but he rarely deigns to respond to your ineffectual flailings.

No.need ti "white-knight" for Ish, who is more than capable of "defending" himself from the likes of you if he felt like bothering to do so. Without question he could destroy you in any intellectual contest with a fifth of hotch in his veins and half his brain tied behind his back.

Serious question: do you honestly believe that a neutral observer comparing your posts versus Ish's would conclude that you are the smarterone? Really?

 

[jaF0]

To wit:



I cannot possibly keep track of the numerous occasions when I have been wrongly accused of constructing what they claim to be a run-in sentence for no other reason than their inability to follow a sentence that has a number of prepositional phrases, subordinate clauses, and adverbial modifiers (not to mention the aforementioned parenthetical asides) that they adjudge to be evidence of a run-on sentence for no other reason than the fact that they felt the need for a snack and perhaps a small nap before the reached the eventual end of the sentence that so taxed their rather limited powers of comprehension.

Like that one.

 

[Que]

Like that one.

The problem with my bad habit of arguing with idiots like yourself is that no one observing the argument can tell which one of us is the idiot. Nothing about that extremely persistent autocorrect of mine changing what I actually typed makes that a run-on sentence. Try to follow along you, nimrod. I may make a typo in telling you that you are an idiot in this post. You might catch another typo in the process. That still won't make you smart, just a good proofreader. Proofreading requires only a basic ear for sentence construction, soelling and grammar. In short, if you can read at a sixth-grade level, you can proofread. Fir most passages, you don't even need to be familiar with all of the words, since word usage of unfamiliar ones can usually be defined by their use in context.

I caught (and corrected) that persistent autocorrect TWICE!. The fact that it slipped through the third time neither negates the actual point I was making, nor does it make that sentence a run-on as you just asserted.

It also is not such an egregious error as to mask the intended meaning else you could not have caught the error. If the intended word, in context was not abundantly clear, how could someone so bereft of intelligence as you ever notice it was the wrong word?

There needs to be some equivalent to Godwin's law for this situation. Pedant's law, perhaps? When you're reduced to proofreading someone else's posts in order to "defeat" them on the interwebs you've already lost the internet.

I can usually feel my IQ slip 5-10 points every time I click, "view post." I won't make that mistake with you again.

 

[zipman]

Speaking of limited powers of comprehension.^

Nothing in my post "defended" Ish from your slur. Your slur was that he is a drunkard. I neither supported nor disputed your idiocy. What I suggested was that if you wanted to make that slur, there was much richer material for you to mine. Not that you are smart enough, or creative enough to do so, even when (as I just did) someone draws you a picture.

I cannot imagine that Ish would need me to "rush in" to defend him from a dullard like you. You didn't even create the insult yourself. Ish, I'm reasonably sure, has you quite sensibly on ignore. If not. He just ignores you the old-fashioned way. I doubt you have noticed, but he rarely deigns to respond to your ineffectual flailings.

No.need ti "white-knight" for Ish, who is more than capable of "defending" himself from the likes of you if he felt like bothering to do so. Without question he could destroy you in any intellectual contest with a fifth of hotch in his veins and half his brain tied behind his back.

Serious question: do you honestly believe that a neutral observer comparing your posts versus Ish's would conclude that you are the smarterone? Really?

Your man-crush on Ish is quite adorable. I would call it a bromance but I'm not sure the feelings are mutual.

But don't you think you should have told him via pm? That's a lot of love to just throw out onto the boards.

 

[von_Bismarck]

I've seen Que white knight for the RWCJ before but, damn, that was some white knighting. Bet Ismale actually felt that reach-around.

 

[zipman]

I've seen Que white knight for the RWCJ before but, damn, that was some white knighting. Bet Ismale actually felt that reach-around.

LOL, and Q, Mr. Brilliant himself doesn't even see it.

 

[Que]

If anthropogenic global warming is an actual concern, I am going to climate change hell for my participation in this thread alone. I have given oxygen to mouth breathers who are a waste of it for far more obvious reasons than impact on climate while exhaling CO2 into my androids voice to text engine and vociferusly swearing at autocorrect and nimrods.

I am not worried about climate change hell. I live in Arizona.

 

[Que]

LOL, and Q, Mr. Brilliant himself doesn't even see it.

Probably because- unlike you and Rob, I actually know what the phrase means.

Just for illustrative purposes the reach-around that Rob just gave you?...You know that friendly warm feeling you felt from his hand on your dick? That was white knighting.

You misused the term, and he backed you up because he has the desparetle need to (direct quote) "Fuck Que!" regardless of what it costs him in dignity.

If you guys enjoy talking about reach-arounds and circle jerks, you might try the LGBT areas. If you aren't quite comfortable with your sexuality to go there yet, consider perusing handjob and masturbation threads as a gateway.

 

[jaF0]

no one observing the argument can tell which one of us is the idiot.

Oh, everybody knows you're the idiot.

 

[Que]

Your man-crush on Ish is quite adorable. I would call it a bromance but I'm not sure the feelings are mutual.

But don't you think you should have told him via pm? That's a lot of love to just throw out onto the boards.

You avoided the question, it was a simple one.

Do you honestly believe you are smarter than Ish?

If so, what metric are you using to assess that? Your IQ? Your vocabulary? Your verbal skills? Your reasoning ability?

If you don't feel qualified to answer the second part, a simple, yes or no as to whether you honestly believe you are smarter will do.

 

[von_Bismarck]

(direct quote) "Fuck Que!"

Taken way out of context, Queefy, but I don't expect honesty from the resident methhead.

 

[zipman]

Probably because- unlike you and Rob, I actually know what the phrase means.

Just for illustrative purposes the reach-around that Rob just gave you?...You know that friendly warm feeling you felt from his hand on your dick? That was white knighting.

You misused the term, and he backed you up because he has the desparetle need to (direct quote) "Fuck Que!" regardless of what it costs him in dignity.

If you guys enjoy talking about reach-arounds and circle jerks, you might try the LGBT areas. If you aren't quite comfortable with your sexuality to go there yet, consider perusing handjob and masturbation threads as a gateway.

Really?

IKYABWAI is such a lame response.

And you're going to lecture me about lack of originality?

 

[Que]

Taken way out of context, Queefy, but I don't expect honesty from the resident methhead.

How do you take the entirety of an expression "out of context?

There were no words before "Fuck" and there were no words after "Que"

"Fuck Que" was the entire, openly stated raison d'etré.

Some days, that seems true for you as von_Bismark when you forget that you created the DickFagman family of alts to sound smart with borrowed Scentific American clippings to impress "Teh Ladeeez" who were never as impressed with this manufactured persona of yours.

Most people, I would advise to present their authentic self because that is generally more appealing because it rings true. In your case I wouldn't because then you would be just *you*.

 

[Que]

Really?

IKYABWAI is such a lame response.

And you're going to lecture me about lack of originality?

I'm sorry, does that mean you need directions to the jerk-off threads? I can't really tell what you are specifically asking me here.