What's happened to respect for the elderly?

[rippitydoo]

Fine, you don't have a problem with comprehension. Clearly the problem is with your communication skills. Oh well. I'm unaware of any major problems I have aside from a bad habit of being too polite for too long.

Well congrats. You are capable of understanding the basics.

I am capable of understanding the basics & complexities. The problems are yours, & include these:

1] Not recognizing/admitting your own problems

2] Knowing your own problems, but claiming they are others' (communication, comprehension, staying on-topic, etc.)

3] Being too extreme on either side of the spectrum (claiming you're too polite when the opposite is true, etc.)

 

[Sean Renaud]

I am capable of understanding the basics & complexities. The problems are yours, & include these:

1] Not recognizing/admitting your own problems

2] Knowing your own problems, but claiming they are others' (communication, comprehension, staying on-topic, etc.)

3] Being too extreme on either side of the spectrum (claiming you're too polite when the opposite is true, etc.)

No one else seems to know my problems, the problem was clearly yours, I am far, far, far too polite for far too long. That's not even extreme. You claiming otherwise is more proof that you have never been on a forum certainly not this one for any length of time.

 

[rippitydoo]

No one else seems to know my problems, the problem was clearly yours, I am far, far, far too polite for far too long. That's not even extreme. You claiming otherwise is more proof that you have never been on a forum certainly not this one for any length of time.

Don't expect anyone else to know your problems, even though they're blatantly obvious, when you don't. Also, don't claim you're too polite for too long & I haven't been here long enough when there is proof on these Forums I've been here quite some time & you're rarely-if-ever polite.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Don't expect anyone else to know your problems, even though they're blatantly obvious, when you don't. Also, don't claim you're too polite for too long & I haven't been here long enough when there is proof on these Forums I've been here quite some time & you're rarely-if-ever polite.

Aww, that's so cute. If you think I'm rarely if ever polite you clearly haven't been on these forums for very long. That's just the simple truth.

 

[rippitydoo]

Aww, that's so cute. If you think I'm rarely if ever polite you clearly haven't been on these forums for very long. That's just the simple truth.

I've been on the forums for years & you wouldn't know the truth if it hit you (& it may), both of which I posted before, which means you may have been here forever, but spent none of that time thinking about anyone's posts & thoughts other than your own.

 

[Sean Renaud]

I've been on the forums for years & you wouldn't know the truth if it hit you (& it may), both of which I posted before, which means you may have been here forever, but spent none of that time thinking about anyone's posts & thoughts other than your own.

Again that's a blatant lie. Even in this thread here I obviously gave great thought to Ice Princess and her opinion. At least I know that you're a liar not an idiot now. I gave a great deal of thought to Renard Ruse's question, which if you knew you'd know wasn't actually a question it was just an insult to anybody beneath the age of 40 yet I was in no way rude, didn't call him any names just gave a well thought out and explained answer.

You were the one who came long rudely and said I was wrong without offering any alternative theory of your own. So you're confused when it comes to whom isn't thinking about other people's posts or thoughts.

 

[badbabysitter]

"The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for
authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place
of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their
households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They
contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties
at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers."


---------- Socrates


this is nothing new

 

[Sean Renaud]

Of course the elderly whining is nothing new. I do think there is a noticable shift between the way my parents dealt with their parents and the way I deal with them and seems to be fairly true across the board. To the day my grandfather died I don't believe my father ever called him anything but "Mr. X" or if he was talking to me "it's your grandfather." I don't think I knew any of my grandparents first names until their funerals.

Today I know all of my friends parents first names and the only reason I don't use them is because I generally just look at someone and start talking no need for names in the first goddamn place.

 

[rippitydoo]

Again that's a blatant lie. Even in this thread here I obviously gave great thought to Ice Princess and her opinion. At least I know that you're a liar not an idiot now. I gave a great deal of thought to Renard Ruse's question, which if you knew you'd know wasn't actually a question it was just an insult to anybody beneath the age of 40 yet I was in no way rude, didn't call him any names just gave a well thought out and explained answer.

You were the one who came long rudely and said I was wrong without offering any alternative theory of your own. So you're confused when it comes to whom isn't thinking about other people's posts or thoughts.

Again that's a blatant lie. You're not thinking about my opinions or thoughts, preferring to simply insult me, admittedly with things you are guessing at & later self-correcting with a new insult in place of the old one.

Regardless of anyone's opinions or thoughts, if you thought much at all, you would find better ways to phrase your posts than something like, "If you knew you'd know...". My guess (I admit I'm guessing & may be wrong, unlike you) is you will then respond by claiming I'm an idiot for not comprehending the meaning of that, when the fact (which we all know to be one) is you posted it hoping for that & not knowing yourself what you meant (if you even had a meaning in mind, as I wonder if you just search topics for people you can insult, etc. instead of thinking & posting on-topic.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Again that's a blatant lie. You're not thinking about my opinions or thoughts, preferring to simply insult me, admittedly with things you are guessing at & later self-correcting with a new insult in place of the old one.

Regardless of anyone's opinions or thoughts, if you thought much at all, you would find better ways to phrase your posts than something like, "If you knew you'd know...". My guess (I admit I'm guessing & may be wrong, unlike you) is you will then respond by claiming I'm an idiot for not comprehending the meaning of that, when the fact (which we all know to be one) is you posted it hoping for that & not knowing yourself what you meant (if you even had a meaning in mind, as I wonder if you just search topics for people you can insult, etc. instead of thinking & posting on-topic.

You haven't given any opinions or thoughts to think about, and if you think I've been insulting you again you're new to this board aren't ya? I might not be licking your asshole clean but I'm far from calling you a names.

I don't recall using a phrase even similar to "if you knew, you'd know" but I'm not about to read over every post. I know exactly what i meant and if you ever need clarification you need only ask. I'm fully aware that I have a habit of getting a bit too wordy for people. And no, it's rarely if you don't know you're an idiot, it's often if you don't know it's because you don't want to know. There is a vast difference between the two.

 

[tnadnuder]

You haven't given any opinions or thoughts to think about, and if you think I've been insulting you again you're new to this board aren't ya? I might not be licking your asshole clean but I'm far from calling you a names.

I don't recall using a phrase even similar to "if you knew, you'd know" but I'm not about to read over every post. I know exactly what i meant and if you ever need clarification you need only ask. I'm fully aware that I have a habit of getting a bit too wordy for people. And no, it's rarely if you don't know you're an idiot, it's often if you don't know it's because you don't want to know. There is a vast difference between the two.

I've given plenty of thoughts &/or opinions to think about. Once again, you are ascribing an action (or lack of it) to me that has actually been done far more by you. Also, one thing you seem to be doing less (perhaps to make up for overdoing the other) is writing run-on sentences.

Again, you also claim I am new to the board when my posts & thousands of other posts & individual members could tell you otherwise. Also, nobody is asking you to lick their asshole, but stop using yours to "speak".

You don't recall ever using the phrase?! That doesn't surprise me (things said/written by people with closed &/or small minds like yourselves rarely does), so here's a link for you.

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=68153111&postcount=31

Also, you claim to know exactly what you yourself meant, but you also claim that I have not done things I clearly have, & that I have not been here very long, which I have repeatedly said is not true, so this new claim is just as obviously another falsehood.

"And no," it's another run-on group of words you use that can not even properly be called a "run-on sentence". I'll believe there is a vast difference between the two, the same way there is a vast difference between:

1] The version(s) of me you claim exist(s) & the one we both know actually does.

2] An intelligent person & yourself.

3] Being an idiot & not knowing it, being an idiot & not wanting to know it, & being an idiot but simultaneously being well aware of it & often confronted by it/the degree of it (the last of these being you)

 

[Sean Renaud]

I've given plenty of thoughts &/or opinions to think about. Once again, you are ascribing an action (or lack of it) to me that has actually been done far more by you. Also, one thing you seem to be doing less (perhaps to make up for overdoing the other) is writing run-on sentences.

An open an admitted alt. That's pretty fucking bold. Just curious how many of you are there? Three? Four? Seven?

Again, you also claim I am new to the board when my posts & thousands of other posts & individual members could tell you otherwise. Also, nobody is asking you to lick their asshole, but stop using yours to "speak".

You are infact asking me to lick your asshole, that's apparently what respect and politeness means in your neck of the woods.

You don't recall ever using the phrase?! That doesn't surprise me (things said/written by people with closed &/or small minds like yourselves rarely does), so here's a link for you.

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=68153111&postcount=31

Oh cute, entirely different context but okay. I SAID THAT.
See problem solved.

Also, you claim to know exactly what you yourself meant, but you also claim that I have not done things I clearly have, & that I have not been here very long, which I have repeatedly said is not true, so this new claim is just as obviously another falsehood.

Sorry, I didn't know you were an alt hoarder. I took you at your word that you had a bit over a thousand posts and had been year a little over eighteen months. I have this bad habit of giving people the benefit of the doubt instead of assuming they are scum. I apologize to you for that. Again how many of you are there? Nine? Eleven? Sixteen?

"And no," it's another run-on group of words you use that can not even properly be called a "run-on sentence". I'll believe there is a vast difference between the two, the same way there is a vast difference between:

Oh, I do have a problem with run-ons. I don't really care this isn't a term paper it's a conversation. And real people speaking run on all the goddamn time.

1] The version(s) of me you claim exist(s) & the one we both know actually does.

2] An intelligent person & yourself.

3] Being an idiot & not knowing it, being an idiot & not wanting to know it, & being an idiot but simultaneously being well aware of it & often confronted by it/the degree of it (the last of these being you)

1) Until now I only accused you of being one person. I didn't know you were an alt. How many again? Twenty one? Thirty six? Are you everbody on the board but me?

2) Yep I am.

3) Not an idiot, though there are things I don't know. Are you quite finished. Can you give me a list so that when I finally decide that you're not worth the energy I'm wasting I toss all of you on the iggy fire at the same goddamn time. I don't want to go with you what I had to with Jen.

By the way even in the rude place that Lit is, it's generally considered incredibly rude (or possibly just stupid) to use an alt to continue the same conversation assuming the person will just know that you are the same person. It's not like I can see your face or anything.

All this arguing and you've still yet to present anything pointing out why my opinion is wrong, nor offering an alternate opinion of your own. Obvious troll is obvious.

 

[rippitydoo]

An open an admitted alt. That's pretty fucking bold. Just curious how many of you are there? Three? Four? Seven?

Guess I never logged-out of this Username before, which I only use on purpose when commenting on stories on Literotica. (Don't ask me why, but perhaps one of the millions of members who know I've been here for years can tell you.) Also, what is "An open an..." supposed to mean?! Lastly, who cares how many of me there supposedly are, since any of them individually is smarter than you?!

You are infact asking me to lick your asshole, that's apparently what respect and politeness means in your neck of the woods.

Respect & politeness in the 9+ states I've been in mean two things you need not know, as you have proven you are unable to use the latter & undeserving of the other. Also, I am never asking you to be anywhere near my rear end unless it means you have decided to get away & nevermore waste my time. (Note my reference to Poe, also a reference to "in fact" not being a single word.)

Oh cute, entirely different context but okay. I SAID THAT.
See problem solved.

No cuteness or context changed. Also, problem not solved as you continue to respond to me rather than the thread topic.

Sorry, I didn't know you were an alt hoarder. I took you at your word that you had a bit over a thousand posts and had been year a little over eighteen months. I have this bad habit of giving people the benefit of the doubt instead of assuming they are scum. I apologize to you for that.

I may not have "been year" very long at all. What state or country is that in? Also, I am not scum. However, there is no need to apologize for not assuming I was... Not only since I am truly not, but since many say we were all created differently, & at best scum is what you are.

Again how many of you are there? Nine? Eleven? Sixteen?

Just the one, who knows you're not really worth his time.

Oh, I do have a problem with run-ons. I don't really care this isn't a term paper it's a conversation. And real people speaking run on all the goddamn time.

If we listed your problems, this would need to be its own thread. Also, this is not a conversation, as it is in writing, where it is often preferred one edit their work to remove run-ons, lies, &.... Lots of things come in threes, so what else do you need to quit?

1) Until now I only accused you of being one person. I didn't know you were an alt. How many again? Twenty one? Thirty six? Are you everbody on the board but me?

I'm not an alt, nor am I an idiot. I'm curious if you & the thread-starter might be an alt of each other. Also, I only inhabit one body, & am not sure what an "everbody" is (though I see not a word).

2) Yep I am.

You agree with what I wrote, & then claim you are one, when I was clearly writing there was a difference between the two. This proves you are either an idiot (which you then immediately claim not to be) or a liar (which you have also claimed to not be, though in both cases, posts have proven otherwise).

3) Not an idiot, though there are things I don't know. Are you quite finished. Can you give me a list so that when I finally decide that you're not worth the energy I'm wasting I toss all of you on the iggy fire at the same goddamn time. I don't want to go with you what I had to with Jen.

I'd be happy to let you know when I'm done or give you a list the second you ask for one, the same way I'll give you answers to questions. You know them because they end in question marks (like the one in the thread topic). Also, I don't know what you went through with jen, but one thing all members can agree on is it was nothing involving the use of energy or intelligence.

All this arguing and you've still yet to present anything pointing out why my opinion is wrong, nor offering an alternate opinion of your own. Obvious troll is obvious.

Repetition is not creation of facts. Opinions often can not be proven right or wrong, but facts can usually be proven. I believe I did point out my disagreements with your opinions, & at the very least allude to my own. However, I'm still wondering why you repeatedly claim I have not given reasons for your opinion to be wrong, when the truth is neither of us have said it was such (myself calling it wrong, you claiming it as anything other than fact).