Who Is Lying About Iraq?

zipman said:
If you read the link I posted you would know about how the information was vetted and how Bush's changing of that process impacted the veracity of the intelligence.

Here's a newsflash for you and I don't need to put it in large letters: Iraq was not involved with 9/11 no matter how much you try and link them and the attacks on 9/11 did not utilize WMD's.

Rather than actually discuss any of these legitimate issues, you want to discuss the Clintons and Ted Kennedy.

Happily, more and more Americans (and that includes Republicans) are opening their eyes.

LOL. :)
What about the information process Clinton used to bomb that aspirin factory? Do you think he vetter any information that told him that wasnt an aspirin factory? No he didnt.
 
BlueEyesInLevis said:
... and women can now vote in Iraq (Something that doesnt seem to matter to Pookie) ...

Ahh, yes. You've played the Clinton and Kennedy cards. Now it's time to put words in my mouth. Well done! You're such a good wingnut. :)
 
BlueEyesInLevis said:
What about the information process Clinton used to bomb that aspirin factory? Do you think he vetter any information that told him that wasnt an aspirin factory? No he didnt.

Actually, it was basically the same thing in that particular situation. And yet, the Bush Administration didn't learn from Clinton's mistake. Instead, they implemented the process that lead to the bombing as THE day-to-day vetting process for themselves.
 
BlueEyesInLevis said:
Liberals always try to forget 9/11, because 9/11 changed everything.

Neocons will never forget 9/11, because 9/11 is their answer to everything.

Playing the partisan rhetoric game is fun! *nods*
 
Pookie said:
Ahh, yes. You've played the Clinton and Kennedy cards. Now it's time to put words in my mouth. Well done! You're such a good wingnut. :)
How DARE I?

How dare I remind you of the mass murders and the tortures!
How dare I remind you of the gassings of the Kurds!
How dare I remind you of the invasions of Iran and Kuwait!
How dare I remind you that women couldnt vote!

How dare I remind you of the mass murders and the tortures are now OVER!
How dare I remind you of the gassings of the Kurds are now OVER!
How dare I remind you of the invasions of Iran and Kuwait are now OVER!
How dare I remind you that women can now VOTE!

This isnt about them its about THEM! It never was. Its ALL about US and our petty little political partisanships and its about our marches and its about our protests.
 
BlueEyesInLevis said:
How DARE I?

How dare I remind you of the mass murders and the tortures!
How dare I remind you of the gassings of the Kurds!
How dare I remind you of the invasions of Iran and Kuwait!
How dare I remind you that women couldnt vote!

How dare I remind you of the mass murders and the tortures are now OVER!
How dare I remind you of the gassings of the Kurds are now OVER!
How dare I remind you of the invasions of Iran and Kuwait are now OVER!
How dare I remind you that women can now VOTE!

This isnt about them its about THEM! It never was. Its ALL about US and our petty little political partisanships and its about our marches and its about our protests.

I didn't say "how dare you". But if that rant made you feel better, then I guess that's somethin'.

:rolleyes:
 
Pookie said:
Neocons will never forget 9/11, because 9/11 is their answer to everything.

Playing the partisan rhetoric game is fun! *nods*
Why is it that only REPUBLICANS are partisan?

Why is when the WORLDS WORST TERRORIST ATTACK IN HISTORY is even mentioned, its only partisan rhetoric?

Why is it that that when Democrats say "Bush Lied!" for saying EXACTLY what Clinton and the rest of the Deocrats said about Iraq, its NOT "partisan rhetoric"?

"Partisaqn rhetoric" huh? Pookie go to the library, check out a book on psychology and look up the word PROJECTION.
 
Pookie said:
I didn't say "how dare you". But if that rant made you feel better, then I guess that's somethin'.

:rolleyes:

Never said you did Cupcake! You can call it a rant if you want. I call it a reminder of reality.
 
BlueEyesInLevis said:
Why is it that only REPUBLICANS are partisan?

Why is when the WORLDS WORST TERRORIST ATTACK IN HISTORY is even mentioned, its only partisan rhetoric?

Why is it that that when Democrats say "Bush Lied!" for saying EXACTLY what Clinton and the rest of the Deocrats said about Iraq, its NOT "partisan rhetoric"?

"Partisaqn rhetoric" huh? Pookie go to the library, check out a book on psychology and look up the word PROJECTION.

I never said "only Republicans are partisan."

I never said Democrats who say "Bush Lied!" is not partisan rhetoric.

While I'm going to the library, why don't you see about getting a grip, will ya?


Edited to add: I also never said that when "the WORLDS WORST TERRORIST ATTACK IN HISTORY" is ever mentioned, it's only partisan rhetoric.
 
Last edited:
BlueEyesInLevis said:
Never said you did Cupcake! You can call it a rant if you want. I call it a reminder of reality.

So, who were you talking to when you said "How DARE I?" Did you just switch into your busybody mode for that post or somethin'? At least try to keep your rants focused on the things I say, will ya?
 
Pookie said:
I never said "only Republicans are partisan."

I never said Democrats who say "Bush Lied!" is not partisan rhetoric.

While I'm going to the library, why don't you see about getting a grip, will ya?
So you agree that when Dean et al say "Bush Lied" it IS partisan rhetoric?
 
BlueEyesInLevis said:
So you agree that when Dean et al say "Bush Lied" it IS partisan rhetoric?

Without direct proof of him lying, yeah. Do you want a cookie now?
 
Pookie said:
Without direct proof of him lying, yeah. Do you want a cookie now?
No but I'll return the candor...
When the GOP accuses Democrats of being big spenders it is "partisan rhetoric".
 
I read and notice ole Blue Eyes never answered the question "which branch of the service did you serve in."

Hmmmmmm????
 
eagleyez said:
I read and notice ole Blue Eyes never answered the question "which branch of the service did you serve in."

Hmmmmmm????
With that Kind of logic I suppose those that dont pay taxes should not be allowed to vote. Or those that didnt serve in the military should be exempt from criticizing abu-grab or gitmo.

In other words its another rhetorical non-starter.
 
The Army needs more big tough guys like you,

and besides, Iraq is a really cool place to be now...
 
BlueEyesInLevis said:
How DARE I?

How dare I remind you of the mass murders and the tortures!
How dare I remind you of the gassings of the Kurds!
How dare I remind you of the invasions of Iran and Kuwait!
How dare I remind you that women couldnt vote!

How dare I remind you of the mass murders and the tortures are now OVER!
How dare I remind you of the gassings of the Kurds are now OVER!
How dare I remind you of the invasions of Iran and Kuwait are now OVER!
How dare I remind you that women can now VOTE!

This isnt about them its about THEM! It never was. Its ALL about US and our petty little political partisanships and its about our marches and its about our protests.
So when do we start liberating the oppressed people of
Zimbabwe
Sudan
and China?


Fuck you, cocksucker. I demand that my tax dollars and the blood of my fellow troops be spilled for my country and my country alone.

Why don't you get your own ass out there and play merc and liberate them with your own money?
 
Short answer to the thread topic question: Folks like Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Rockefeller are the most egregious prevaricators. Hands down, and for the most craven reason: their political careers.
 
Is it true that our troops are killing an average of 3000 insurgents a month?
 
Back
Top