G
Guest
Guest

Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PMSL!!!!rhinoguy said:right... TITTIES!!
OhMissScarlett said:Here's a really good in depth analysis of Waterhouse's St Eulalia:St. Eulalia It definitely wasn't your usual rose lipped maidens/happy cherubic children painting of that era.
I know! This is why I can never be an art critic. It also makes me wonder if they aren't reading too much into it. Maybe Waterhouse just wanted to piss people off.McKenna said:I scanned this article and I must say ... Damn! I had no idea so much could be taken from one painting.
I feel woefully inadequate with my "Gee, aren't the colors pretty" comments.
![]()
OhMissScarlett said:I know! This is why I can never be an art critic. It also makes me wonder if they aren't reading too much into it. Maybe Waterhouse just wanted to piss people off.

That's my goal.OhMissScarlett said:I know! This is why I can never be an art critic. It also makes me wonder if they aren't reading too much into it. Maybe Waterhouse just wanted to piss people off.

Hmm, I wonder if that applies to other sorts of critics as well.ABSTRUSE said:That's my goal.
My opinion is those who can't paint critique to show how pretentious and stupid they really are.
*snicker* I wonder if his reviews were written in all caps?Sort of the "Loving Wives" author of the painting world?
It's important to get the boobies just right. I think Durer said that.i tell ya it was to show TITTIES!!!



Bastards.rhinoguy said:The critics didn't like his depiction of the Christ child.
nor did "they" like My rendition of Samson and Delilah

Dar~ said:Colly, if you like his work, maybe you would be interested in a fairly famous Montanan artist Named Charles Russell. He's really well known in Montana, Idaho, Wyoming and the Dakotas. I have found that when I was growing up he was a very big deal in Montana, but the further south I come, the less he is known of. His works are really tremendous. He actually lived with and among native Americans and a lot of his Art is from his experiences.
http://www.askart.com/photos/cor7282001/90.jpg
http://www.wildlifeart.org/ArtImages/Large/VBS.jpg

That was classic.rhinoguy said:I mentioned him. Along with Olivia
(while blasting Brotthers Hildebrandt and Boris Vallejo)

rhinoguy said:Sadly many contemporary illustrator/painters are under valued ..especially if they fall into the catagory of Science fiction or Fantasy...or merely illustrator.
To me the BEST Artists ARE illustrators. Hell, that is the history of fine arts. Painters painting for a patron ILLUSTRATING...a prospective bride, an event, a religious parable. Only relatively recently have we experience "art" for Art's sake...Or more acurately for the artist's sake.
I can't agree with you more, so many incredible artists out there are illustrators. They always get the shaft.(I'll let McKenna look up the meaning of that one)rhinoguy said:Sadly many contemporary illustrator/painters are under valued ..especially if they fall into the catagory of Science fiction or Fantasy...or merely illustrator.
To me the BEST Artists ARE illustrators. Hell, that is the history of fine arts. Painters painting for a patron ILLUSTRATING...a prospective bride, an event, a religious parable. Only relatively recently have we experience "art" for Art's sake...Or more acurately for the artist's sake.
