SweetErika
Fingers Crossed
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2004
- Posts
- 13,442
I'm sure I'm going to get hell for this, but I don't think Ifill did well in several respects.
I expected her to ask fair questions and treat the candidates fairly, and she certainly lived up to that, but I was totally unimpressed by her soft approach and unwillingness to keep the candidates on track. I think there should have been more reminders about time limits, sticking to the questions and less letting them go back and forth over and over going on. Because Ifill was so easy, Palin was basically able to stall so much with mostly irrelevant talking points that they got to far fewer questions/issues than they should have.
Ifill was fair and professional, but I would have much rather seen her be tougher with both candidates than let them go off on tangents and disregard the agreed upon format and time limits on just about every question. I think the questions could have been a little harder, too.
I expected her to ask fair questions and treat the candidates fairly, and she certainly lived up to that, but I was totally unimpressed by her soft approach and unwillingness to keep the candidates on track. I think there should have been more reminders about time limits, sticking to the questions and less letting them go back and forth over and over going on. Because Ifill was so easy, Palin was basically able to stall so much with mostly irrelevant talking points that they got to far fewer questions/issues than they should have.
Ifill was fair and professional, but I would have much rather seen her be tougher with both candidates than let them go off on tangents and disregard the agreed upon format and time limits on just about every question. I think the questions could have been a little harder, too.
