Why so many Anti-trump posts?

Mike Pence claims ‘liberal activists’ are infiltrating GOP town halls in speech about gutting Obamacare

“Despite the best efforts of liberal activists at town halls around the country, the American people know better,” Pence told CPAC attendees. “Obamacare has failed and Obamacare must go.”

He added that the “failed law” that is Obamacare is “crippling the American economy and crushing the American people. Talk about your fake news, folks. Just look at all the promises liberals made about Obamacare,” he said.

Voters have been showing up at town halls in masses over the last few days, demanding answers from Republicans about how they plan to replace Obamacare in order to receive quality, affordable health care.

Oh Mikey, Liberal Activists are voters too! He's just mad because they won't get in step with the goose steppers.
 
How about anti-refugee? Does that one stick with the majority of Trump supporters?

There are no rational arguments for the anti-refugee position, and several against it, not to mention basic human decency.

So man up and sponsor one phro. Man up, I am sure you will sleep comfortable at night with a non vetted or even yet a vetted one sleeping in your house. Be ready to be like you want our government to be. Give them all the money and benefits they are entitled to. And give us that cute little libbi smile.
 
How about anti-refugee? Does that one stick with the majority of Trump supporters?

There are no rational arguments for the anti-refugee position, and several against it, not to mention basic human decency.




Putting aside the national security argument for the moment, there is the cost. Each Middle Eastern refugee resettled in the United States costs an estimated $64,370 in the first five years.

http://cis.org/High-Cost-of-Resettling-Middle-Eastern-Refugees

Given that we are currently running a deficit of about $441 Billion, maybe you should step up and write a check to help out.
 
Putting aside the national security argument for the moment, there is the cost. Each Middle Eastern refugee resettled in the United States costs an estimated $64,370 in the first five years.

http://cis.org/High-Cost-of-Resettling-Middle-Eastern-Refugees

Given that we are currently running a deficit of about $441 Billion, maybe you should step up and write a check to help out.

Never, ever link the Center for Immigration Studies in support of any argument in an immigration-related debate. That's like linking Creation Answers.
 
"...according to the SPLC, "the reality is that CIS has never found any aspect of immigration that it liked."[1] CIS is part of the John Tanton Network, the anti-immigrant "empire of organizations" created by, or connected to, population-control advocate and nativist John Tanton."

[1]

↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Southern Poverty Law Center, CIS: The "Independent" Think Tank, organizational article, February 2009

John Tanton

"John Tanton, a retired Michigan ophthalmologist who operates a racist publishing company and has written that to maintain American culture, "a European-American majority" is required."

CIS was conceived by Tanton and began life as a program of FAIR. CIS presents itself as a scholarly think tank that produces serious immigration studies meant to serve "the broad national interest." But the reality is that CIS has never found any aspect of immigration that it liked, and it has frequently manipulated data to achieve the results it seeks. Its executive director last fall posted an item on the conservative National Review Online website about Washington Mutual, a bank that had earlier issued a press release about its inclusion on a list of "Business Diversity Elites" compiled by Hispanic Business magazine. Over a copy of the bank's press release, the CIS leader posted a headline — "Cause and Effect?" — that suggested a link between the bank's opening its ranks to Latinos and its subsequent collapse.


See more at this link-
https://www.splcenter.org/20090201/nativist-lobby-three-faces-intolerance#.UcCxlvZATt8
 
Never, ever link the Center for Immigration Studies in support of any argument in an immigration-related debate. That's like linking Creation Answers.

You do realize the $64k is over 5 years, not each year....right?

The estimate of $12,800 per year is accurate.


11,000 Pounds per refuge each year in England, assuming they work. 23,000 Pounds per year if they don't.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-34567209


12,500 Euros per refugee per year in Germany.

http://www.dw.com/en/what-helping-refugees-costs-germany/a-18693996



Of course, as your footer suggests, you are free to post up your own citations refuting this cost estimate.


Or do we just stick with the poopy-head thingie?
 
Last edited:
Thank you for re-stating what I previously posted. Was that for the benefit of the more "challenged" among us? :rolleyes:

I simply added the part you omitted about how Hillary and her campaign staff had nothing to do with concocting the birther lie and disavowed it before it became a full-fledged rumor. I'm sure this omission was a mere oversight on your part, and was in no way meant to imply that the Clinton campaign bears responsibility for this ugly racist chapter in American politics. You're welcome. :kiss:
 
I simply added the part you omitted about how Hillary and her campaign staff had nothing to do with concocting the birther lie and disavowed it before it became a full-fledged rumor. I'm sure this omission was a mere oversight on your part, and was in no way meant to imply that the Clinton campaign bears responsibility for this ugly racist chapter in American politics. You're welcome. :kiss:

Not omitted....contained in the cite (yes----cite with a "c") to which I posted a link.

See, the big kids call this a reference.
 
Last edited:
"...according to the SPLC, "the reality is that CIS has never found any aspect of immigration that it liked."[1] CIS is part of the John Tanton Network, the anti-immigrant "empire of organizations" created by, or connected to, population-control advocate and nativist John Tanton."

[1]

↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Southern Poverty Law Center, CIS: The "Independent" Think Tank, organizational article, February 2009

John Tanton

"John Tanton, a retired Michigan ophthalmologist who operates a racist publishing company and has written that to maintain American culture, "a European-American majority" is required."

CIS was conceived by Tanton and began life as a program of FAIR. CIS presents itself as a scholarly think tank that produces serious immigration studies meant to serve "the broad national interest." But the reality is that CIS has never found any aspect of immigration that it liked, and it has frequently manipulated data to achieve the results it seeks. Its executive director last fall posted an item on the conservative National Review Online website about Washington Mutual, a bank that had earlier issued a press release about its inclusion on a list of "Business Diversity Elites" compiled by Hispanic Business magazine. Over a copy of the bank's press release, the CIS leader posted a headline — "Cause and Effect?" — that suggested a link between the bank's opening its ranks to Latinos and its subsequent collapse.


See more at this link-
https://www.splcenter.org/20090201/nativist-lobby-three-faces-intolerance#.UcCxlvZATt8

So slush. Put your money where your mouth is. Sponsor a Muslim refugee. Vetted or non. And don't pick an easy one like a child that has had their arms or legs blown off by isis after their parents were killed by the same. Just pick a sharia law follower. Let them live in your home with your family. Sleep well and don't you worry one lil bit about yourself or your family's safety. And be so generous as to give them all the money they desire as you wish our government does to the less deserving.
 
Not omitted....contained in the cite (yes----cite with a "c") to which I posted a link.

See, the big kids call this a reference.

I believe you mean "citation" (noun) as opposed to "cite" (verb). Overly educated, smarty-pants elitist liberals know the difference. Pardon the piling on, but I'm not in a particularly charitable mood.
 
What never works in political discussions is calling people or candidates names, correcting peoples typos and gammar/spelling mistakes to make yourself look smart. It just makes you look pompus and insecure. What some liberals never seem to realize is how their speech is already impacting the next election. Playing right into our hands.
 
So slush. Put your money where your mouth is. Sponsor a Muslim refugee. Vetted or non. And don't pick an easy one like a child that has had their arms or legs blown off by isis after their parents were killed by the same. Just pick a sharia law follower. Let them live in your home with your family. Sleep well and don't you worry one lil bit about yourself or your family's safety. And be so generous as to give them all the money they desire as you wish our government does to the less deserving.

Steven Crowder called a bunch of Liberal Churches and asked them if they were willing to help house the refugees. It's hilarious.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=j9zIzIePjpo
 
Clinton campaign's disavowal of volunteer's starting rumor omitted in opening statement. This is shoddy at best and at worst is something what grown ups often referto as "lying by omission."

Yes, I suppose I could have cut and pasted the entire article into my post, but I chose to post the link instead. Most people on the webz know how to clicky the linky.


BTW, my post was sort of agreeing with your point. I'm guessing you don't have many friends.



I believe you mean "citation" (noun) as opposed to "cite" (verb). Overly educated, smarty-pants elitist liberals know the difference. Pardon the piling on, but I'm not in a particularly charitable mood.


Cite is often used informally as a slang abbreviation for citation. As in "give me the cite for that case."



Now, isn't there a protest waiting for you somewhere?
 
Last edited:
Yes, I suppose I could have cut and pasted the entire article into my post, but I chose to post the link instead. Most people on the webz know how to clicky the linky.

BTW, my post was sort of agreeing with your point. I'm guessing you don't have many friends.

But no, you chose to "sort of agree" with my point, and imply that Hillary was at least partly responsible for the whole birther nonsense, and linked an article that you didn't read.
"Clicky the linky?" What are you, a 12 year old? Maybe some day you'll get to hang out with the cool kids.
 
Bullshit. Steven Crowder is a racist, lying coward. There are plenty of churches willing to take in refugees. Even conservative ones. I just destroy you and Crowder with a single Google search.

I remember when Crowder got his special snowflake ass handed to him and he cried about it on TV.



Have you even met a Muslim person? I suspect not.



"If you want to know why the Republican Party is dying, and will soon be extinct, "- Some (D) editor in 2010 talking about how racist Crowder is. I wonder how he is dealing, LOL
 
Back
Top