Why social conservatives want Romney to run again

They didn't like the idea of government in general, but bowed to the need of the necessary evil, trying as well to bind it down with the chains of the Constitution.

But that is secondary, of course, the main point of the Constitution was to create a much stronger federal government than was possible under the Articles of Confederation.
 
They didn't like the idea of government in general, but bowed to the need of the necessary evil, trying as well to bind it down with the chains of the Constitution.

Horseshit.

Every one of the the states existing at the time of the Declaration of Independence retained the power of the King. The Constitution sought to seed some of that power to a central government; but the power not ceded remained with the states.
 
So who will the Pubs nominate? It's getting close.

I'm not a Vietnam-era Marine, so I'm not afraid to go on the record.

At this time, barring an unforeseen scandal, I predict Jeb Bush will be the Republican nominee for president in 2016.
 
I'm not a Vietnam-era Marine, so I'm not afraid to go on the record.

At this time, barring an unforeseen scandal, I predict Jeb Bush will be the Republican nominee for president in 2016.

Wingnut Nation will be catatonic. Who will AJ vote for to teach us a lesson this time?
 
From a UK perspective - and goodness knows we are right-wing by European and even domestic post-war standards - what is astonishing is that someone with Jeb Bush's views is not considered a social conservative in the US. The mind boggles.

I know, right? Who knew Reagan would turn out to be such a flaming liberal.
 
I voted for Romney last time. I don't agree with all his politics, but I think he'd be a good President.
 
Back
Top