Why you should not vote for Mrs. Bill Clinton

Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Here's many of my reasons:

I think that on issues as fundamental as how to protect Social Security, a candidate for president owes it to the American people to tell us where they stand.

I don't think people know what her agenda exactly is.

I firmly believe is that we've got to be clear with the American people right now about the important choices that we're going to need to make in order to get a mandate for change, not to try to obfuscate and avoid being a target in the general election.

A Zogby poll released Monday also showed that 50 percent of Americans surveyed said they would never vote for Clinton.

There is a legacy that is both an enormous advantage to her in a Democratic primary, but also a disadvantage to her in a general election.

I don't think anybody would claim that Senator Clinton is going to inspire a horde of new voters. I don't think it's realistic that she is going to get a whole bunch of Republicans to think differently about her.
I don't care about any of these. There are reasons I'm not voting for her, but these are irrelevant.

As for soc. security, this might help: http://www.ontheissues.org/Hillary_Clinton.htm#Social_Security
 
TANG GOD said:
you two could be older than steven colbert's dad.

Not hard to be older than Colbert's dad, Colbert's father died in a plane crash, when Stephen was 11 years old.
 
sweethotchilli said:
Her icy embrace of reactionary policies and laws such as warantless wire tapping, the Military Commissions Act and the perennial Fascist anti flag burning amendment show that she simply wants to be on the side that she
thinks is winning and is perfectly willing to join people who hold her in utter contempt. It's easy for a lot of Dems to be cynical where she's concerned by
way of the "anybody but Bush" logic, President Fuckwad has certainly made it easy for too many of americans to be that myopic. I just hope that somebody emerges from the Democrat party to overtake her and stop this dynastic pattern that has set into the Presidential race. Since 1980, either a Bush or a Clinton has campaigned for President. This is a sick development that's American and elitist at its core. After 8 years of the most corrupt and incompetent administration in US history, we can't afford somebody with Hillary's lack of conviction and situational ethics. The Dems need to kick her back,and fast or they will hand the next election to whatever sorry excuse for a candidate that the GOP pulls from its ranks.

I´m going to adopt you.

I´m against Hillary for one reason: I´m anti-monarchy. I don´t want to live in a country that trades dynasties. 2016: George P. Bush, 2020: Chelsea Clinton, etc.
In a country of 300 million people, we should be able to choose a president who isn´t connected to either family.
 
Pookie said:
I guess you could say I'm a moderate, taken as a whole. But people seem to just want to see certain parts of me ... it gets confusing. :D

Edit to add: It's time you got to work ... chop chop! :)


I haven't jacked my lumber baybee,
Since my chain saw you!










:nana:
 
I would list all of my reasons why Hitlery should not be President, but I'm afraid that the election would be over before I could finish typing.
 
DesertDave said:
I would list all of my reasons why Hitlery should not be President, but I'm afraid that the election would be over before I could finish typing.

So, you're a misogynist...



:D
 
DesertDave said:
I would list all of my reasons why Hitlery should not be President, but I'm afraid that the election would be over before I could finish typing.
Start.
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Here's many of my reasons:

I think that on issues as fundamental as how to protect Social Security, a candidate for president owes it to the American people to tell us where they stand.

I don't think people know what her agenda exactly is.

I firmly believe is that we've got to be clear with the American people right now about the important choices that we're going to need to make in order to get a mandate for change, not to try to obfuscate and avoid being a target in the general election.

A Zogby poll released Monday also showed that 50 percent of Americans surveyed said they would never vote for Clinton.

There is a legacy that is both an enormous advantage to her in a Democratic primary, but also a disadvantage to her in a general election.

I don't think anybody would claim that Senator Clinton is going to inspire a horde of new voters. I don't think it's realistic that she is going to get a whole bunch of Republicans to think differently about her.

So it's not a consensus myth if it supports your radical right rhetoric? ;)

Got it. :D
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:

Just figured that one out. And it seems that it made NO difference at all that I upset your little sandbag. It still worked. Damn.

Ishmael
 
Ishmael said:
Just figured that one out. And it seems that it made NO difference at all that I upset your little sandbag. It still worked. Damn.

Ishmael


And AHM the st-st-stupid one!
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
You have no idea how hard Ish and I are laughing after all your accusations...

I think it's cute that you guys giggle during your circle jerks.

Really.
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
He's defending Jihad in the other thread...

How am I defending jihad?

You're nuttier than lovelynice and LT put together!
 
For the life of me I do not see what the big deal is with the Clintons. I think the right wing wanted a left wing version of Nixon. Since they didn't have one they had to create one.

The worst thing they could get on them was Bill likes blow jobs and she is married to him. (I'm ignoring all the out right looney shit like murdering Vince Foster etc.)
 
Drixxx said:
For the life of me I do not see what the big deal is with the Clintons. I think the right wing wanted a left wing version of Nixon. Since they didn't have one they had to create one.

The worst thing they could get on them was Bill likes blow jobs and she is married to him. (I'm ignoring all the out right looney shit like murdering Vince Foster etc.)
Hillary is also going to implement universal health care and raise taxes, according to the conservatives. Which will make us all poor, again according to them
 
MechaBlade said:
Hillary is also going to implement universal health care and raise taxes, according to the conservatives. Which will make us all poor, again according to them


Paying more tax makes me richer?
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
So, you're a misogynist...



:D

No, I'm not a misogynist, which at any rate would have nothing to do with the subject, especially since the term is defined as hating women.

Which also has nothing to do with the most prominent bulldyke First Lady in US history.
 
Back
Top