Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 71,886
Yes, I know that what I posted was 'factual."Factual.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, I know that what I posted was 'factual."Factual.
So what?You do know most of those states don't actually have people in them right? Like they would have their hands full fighting Los Angeles, not California but LA.
Biden isn't violating the lawYes, I know that what I posted was 'factual."
Does the president have immunity while in office?You are a liar, flat out.
So what?
That claiming half the country is one way and the other is the other is pretty fucking false.
Political theater is funMap Shows 25 States Now Backing Greg Abbott in Border Feud
Jan 26, 2024 at 10:51 AM EST
https://d.newsweek.com/en/full/2341209/abbott-governor-backers-map.webp?w=790&f=616e109ca4ed378feacc8ee7d5eab350
https://www.newsweek.com/map-american-states-backing-texas-governor-greg-abbott-border-feud-1864363
Pretty close to half the country sides with Texas. From a leftwing source as well.
Notably absent are the other states that share a border with Mexico. There’s no invasion.Map Shows 25 States Now Backing Greg Abbott in Border Feud
Jan 26, 2024 at 10:51 AM EST
https://d.newsweek.com/en/full/2341209/abbott-governor-backers-map.webp?w=790&f=616e109ca4ed378feacc8ee7d5eab350
https://www.newsweek.com/map-american-states-backing-texas-governor-greg-abbott-border-feud-1864363
Pretty close to half the country sides with Texas. From a leftwing source as well.
That’s not half the country, that’s 26 people.Map Shows 25 States Now Backing Greg Abbott in Border Feud
Jan 26, 2024 at 10:51 AM EST
https://d.newsweek.com/en/full/2341209/abbott-governor-backers-map.webp?w=790&f=616e109ca4ed378feacc8ee7d5eab350
https://www.newsweek.com/map-american-states-backing-texas-governor-greg-abbott-border-feud-1864363
Pretty close to half the country sides with Texas. From a leftwing source as well.
Did I say Biden instructed them to do anything? Just making a point. The BP is saying they aren't going to cut any razor wire, totally contrary to what your media is saying. The SCOTUS didn't say they should either. Here is all the SCOTUS said:You are removed from reality. Biden has not instructed them to arrest anyone.
You fuckers are literally making up shit that isn't happening.
Especially when it collides with and bulldozes to the side of the road closely held fantasies of the left.Political theater is fun

It's still early, and two of those states are governed by America-hating Democrats who have thrown open their border to illegal aliens.Notably absent are the other states that share a border with Mexico. There’s no invasion.
The article you posted, the very first sentence - "Rank-and file BP agents are not going to start arresting TX NG members for following their LAWFUL orders."Did I say Biden instructed them to do anything? Just making a point. The BP is saying they aren't going to cut any razor wire, totally contrary to what your media is saying. The SCOTUS didn't say they should either. Here is all the SCOTUS said:
ORDER LIST: 601 U.S.)MONDAY, JANUARY 22, 2024ORDER IN PENDING CASE23A607 DEPT. OF HOMELAND SEC., ET AL. V. TEXASThe application to vacate injunction presented to JusticeAlito and by him referred to the Court is granted. The December19, 2023 order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, case No. 23-50869, is vacated.Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, Justice Gorsuch, and JusticeKavanaugh would deny the application to vacate injunction.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012224zr_fd9g.pdf
It doesn't say a damn thing about cutting wire or not cutting wire it simply vacates the injunction of the Fifth Circuit.
At the risk of repeating myself, you're an idiot.This just shows how divided the nation is. Which again shows how primed we are for civil war.
SCOTUS didn't say a word about cutting wire nor did they forbid Texas from stringing wire. Read the Order, that's all they said.The article you posted, the very first sentence - "Rank-and file BP agents are not going to start arresting TX NG members for following their LAWFUL orders."
Why post shit if you don't care to read it?
They have already been cutting wire, which is lawful and SCOTUS ruled on that.
The injunction they lifted was in place to stop the feds from cutting wire.SCOTUS didn't say a word about cutting wire nor did they forbid Texas from stringing wire. Read the Order, that's all they said.
I understand the ruling in detail and its ramifications, but it is false and disingenuous for the media to say the SCOTUS says Border Patrol can cut razor wire. They didn't say that. They lifted an injunction against cutting wire entered by the Fifth Circuit. That is all that should have been said. The BP is saying they have no intention to cut the wire. From the article"The injunction they lifted was in place to stop the feds from cutting wire.
Are you fucking stupid?
Yes...yes you are.
The ruling lifted the injunction against the feds from removing the razor wire.I understand the ruling in detail and its ramifications, but it is false and disingenuous for the media to say the SCOTUS says Border Patrol can cut razor wire. They didn't say that. They lifted an injunction against cutting wire entered by the Fifth Circuit. That is all that should have been said. The BP is saying they have no intention to cut the wire. From the article"
And Abbot can do so."Furthering the division between the Border Patrol and the White House was a senior CBP official who said they have no plans to follow through on removing the razor wire put up by Texas. Biden has completely lost whatever leverage he had."
Abbott has said that if such wire is cut they will simply string more.
That was 45's plan, but sadly, his administration wouldn't follow.The Dems don't have a viable candidate. They could provoke a civil war to declare martial law and cancel the election. Are they that desperate, and willing to be real fighters, not just keyboard warriors?
The BP has said it isn't planning to cut any wire. Abbott has said if they do he'll just string more. So at present, it's a stalemate. The federal govt can cut wire and the state can string wire. I posted the exact words of the SCOTUS in post #89. The Appeals Court issued a temporary injunction, and the SCOTUS lifted that injunction but appellate arguments on the original District Court rulings in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals will still be heard on February 7th.The ruling lifted the injunction against the feds from removing the razor wire.
So the feds can remove the razor wire.
That's it
And Abbot can do so.
And the feds can cut and remove it.
Ad infinitum
There's nothing more that the ruling said and so inferring additional actions is literally just horseshit ...which you seem to enjoy
As for using the word "cut"....that's the action that the court had an injunction against....cutting and removal. Whether it specifically says they can cut is irrelevant.
Lol...no, it didn't. It's already been cutting it. CBP said it won't participate in unlawful action.....cutting the wire isn't unlawfulThe BP has said it isn't planning to cut any wire.
That's not a stalemate. That is Texas impeding the federal government doing its job and the feds working through the impediment.Abbott has said if they do he'll just string more. So at present, it's a stalemate.
YepThe federal govt can cut wire and the state can string wire.
Yes, and your actual articles/statements do not actually impact the ruling or actions being taken....as much as you seem to believe they do. Feds are actively removing the wire when needed and Texas is actively putting up more.I posted the exact words of the SCOTUS in post #89. The Appeals Court issued a temporary injunction, and the SCOTUS lifted that injunction but appellate arguments on the original District Court rulings in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals will still be heard on February 7th.