Will There Be Accountability For The Legacy Media

Well there may very well be economic accountability as we see the viewership of the legacy media dropping like a stone in a vacuum.
Precisely so. For the next several years, if they survive that long, they will be beaten severally about the head and shoulders with their own lies.
 
Precisely so. For the next several years, if they survive that long, they will be beaten severally about the head and shoulders with their own lies.
There are not really many lies that you can honestly attribute to the legacy media. Mostly their sins are of omission, of what they ignore -- and most of that results from reporters and editors being answerable to MBAs in suits who sit on the boards of interlocking directorates.
 
There are not really many lies that you can honestly attribute to the legacy media. Mostly their sins are of omission, of what they ignore -- and most of that results from reporters and editors being answerable to MBAs in suits who sit on the boards of interlocking directorates.
Stop it. You're embarrassing yourself. Even your opponents are looking away as you openly engage in Self-flagellation. Here in the dimming light of Lit's forsaken chapel every one of your posts cracks like a scourge on your backside, our hearts recoiling at the sight of your self-inflicted torment, the air heavy with whispered prayers, but there you stand in quiet torment laying bare your flesh and casting your intellectual soul begging for atonement while others have to read and suffer what they can scarcely bear to witness. For the love of God have mercy on us and wake up! :D
 
This is 100% bullshit: "There are not really many lies that you can honestly attribute to the legacy media." They lied 24/7 for years upon years.
Not like you are lying now.

If you ever look into the complaints of RW watchdogs like Accuracy in Media, it always turns out that they're the liars, not the media.

Crankery[edit]​


On the other hand -- if you look into the complaints of LW watchdogs like Media Matters for America -- then it turns out there's actually something to it.

Media Matters for America is a liberal media watchdog, concerned with combating conservative media bias. They famously produced the documentary Outfoxed which demonstrates the bias in Fox News.[1]

Media Matters also tracks and debunks pseudoscience favored by conservatives, including creationism,[2] global warming denialism,[3] and bogus claims about abortion.[4]

According to Bill O'Reilly, former Fox News entertainer, Media Matters is a far-left wing hate group funded by George Soros' shadow party. Although Soros donated US$1 million to Media Matters in 2010, this is his only connection to the organization.[5]

Media Matters is far from unbiased itself, as could be expected from an organization founded by David "Anita Hill is a Perjuring Lesbian" Brock.[note 1] One of their studies purportedly demonstrating conservative bias in newspapers due to conservatives dominating op-ed pages was criticized for weighting columnists syndicated in local rags the same as ones syndicated in major newspapers.[6]

In March of 2014, Media Matters launched Mythopedia, a sort of quick and dirty refutation of claims.[7]
 
Last edited:
I've noticed a shift in language - what used to be called the mainstream media is now being labelled legacy media.

I'm sure it's not purposeful
👍
 
I've noticed a shift in language - what used to be called the mainstream media is now being labelled legacy media.

I'm sure it's not purposeful
👍
"Legacy" implies its replacement by some other format -- but what? The NYT online is still the NYT -- content created by the same reporters and editors.
 
There will be no accountability beyond the court of public opinion.........................and I think that's making itself felt as we speak.

As it should be.

The people will become informed in the ways of their choosing.

Newspapers are dead for reasons.

Video killed the radio star.

Talkies ruined Mary Pickford.
 
"Legacy" implies its replacement by some other format -- but what? The NYT online is still the NYT -- content created by the same reporters and editors.
Your insight is never interesting nor useful.
 
"Legacy" implies its replacement by some other format -- but what? The NYT online is still the NYT -- content created by the same reporters and editors.

Actual reporters doing journalism.

It's what you and people who reject actual journalism as "conspiracy theory" because it doesn't jive with the propaganda you've been fed.
 
Actual reporters doing journalism.

It's what you and people who reject actual journalism as "conspiracy theory" because it doesn't jive with the propaganda you've been fed.
Using the word "breaking" while copying someone else's content you don't attribute is not journalism. It's copyright infringement.
 
The Internet’s unsurpassed ability to aggregate and parse data means the News can be and is whatever there’s a marketable demand for.

  • A live feed of the russia ukraine war with play by play
  • 24/7 Rape News either Global or by Country/City or near you
  • Fires Now
  • Honor Killings Today
 
The Internet’s unsurpassed ability to aggregate and parse data means the News can be and is whatever there’s a marketable demand for.

  • A live feed of the russia ukraine war with play by play
  • 24/7 Rape News either Global or by Country/City or near you
  • Fires Now
  • Honor Killings Today
News Media is entertainment.

Taking publicly available information and providing your commentary on it is, at best, an analyst.

Journalism is neither. If it were, several people here in the forum would be up for a Pulitzer
 
News Media is entertainment.

Taking publicly available information and providing your commentary on it is, at best, an analyst.

Journalism is neither. If it were, several people here in the forum would be up for a Pulitzer
Your opinion matters. To You. Ha ha ha!

“Journalism” was a 20th Century attempt at turning news of the day into a “Profession” ( ie a closed shop)

That “trade” is now obsolete.

Just as the printing press made anyone who had one a Publisher, a smart phone makes its owner a Publisher.
 
Your opinion matters. To You. Ha ha ha!
Deep thoughts

“Journalism” was a 20th Century attempt at turning news of the day into a “Profession” ( ie a closed shop)
Not understanding journalism probbaly is your first issue.

That “trade” is now obsolete.
Drinking the Kool aid

Just as the printing press made anyone who had one a Publisher, a smart phone makes its owner a Publisher.
If you called it "independent publisher", people trusted you more
👍

Maybe if you add the word " breaking" at the top.
 
Just because you hadn’t thought about it doesn’t mean it’s not viable.

You know, like impregnating Adrina on a Friday night at the pool hall.
 
“diversity hire”

Lol
lol-gif-28.gif
 
Back
Top