Que
aʒɑ̃ prɔvɔkatœr
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Posts
- 39,882
Snopes is about as non-partisan as you can get. And I assume you're embarrassed about Conservapedia?
I'm embarrassed that it exists. I wouldn't embarrass myself by citing it the way Oreo proudly cites rational-wiki as if it has any validity at all.
Most of what Snopes addresses aren't particularly partisan. My point is that they are no more qualified to debunk on any given item than any other human on the planet with an internet connection and Google.
Point being that Oreo only reads people that already agree with him.
Snopes and fact-check.org both make diligent efforts to be non-partisan. Their personal biases leak through at times in the language used in debunking or fack-checking.
Liberals that are found wanting are said to have "misspoken" or to have been "factually incorrect" Non-liberals are "damned liars." In not-so-many words.

