Woman preys upon women

[AchtungNight]

Perhaps a huntress luring poor nature photographers after her waiting to turn the tables… wait, I already did that. A psychotic swinger with a miscommunicated agenda? A self-absorbed bipolar actress looking for stress relief and not getting what she expected? A voyeur super heroine walking through walls? I’ve done these too. Any take on the same idea I haven’t done… [shrug] I don’t know. Maybe something in space?

 

[bestkeptsecret678]

Doesn't sound like it’s going well. I don't like flying anymore. I could see a flight attendant losing it.

Air travel is a necessity, at least in my line of work. Further, the places I want to enjoy outside of work also call for flying. Soooo, I’m kind of stuck with it, but only as a means to an end… ‘cuz it’s no effing fun.

Maybe we should come up w a new take on the mile high club as a story?

 

[ChuckWolf]

Air travel is a necessity, at least in my line of work. Further, the places I want to enjoy outside of work also call for flying. Soooo, I’m kind of stuck with it, but only as a means to an end… ‘cuz it’s no effing fun.

Maybe we should come up w a new take on the mile high club as a story?

Maybe a flight attendant is attracted to a passenger (who is either married or single) and initiates things.

I feel like a F A would be able to get away with this, especially if other coworkers are helping keep it quiet and/or participating.

 

[000zing]

Dark is likely referencing a rejection thread a while back where a less titillating scenario was rejected. Yes, that needle can be thread but a number of overconfident authors were sure they had when they had not.

Always best to not speak in absolutes with Lit rules, either allowable or objectionable. Spirit of the rules are written down but the final interpretation of the bounds of those rules rest with one person.

You speak as though everyone on Lit. aims to post their stuff here... I can tell you now that's pretty far from the truth, and for very good reason...

 

[Euphony]

You speak as though everyone on Lit. aims to post their stuff here... I can tell you now that's pretty far from the truth, and for very good reason...

• Walk into a publishing house
• Help yourself to its resources and other's kindness
• Chide those who happen to notice you are working in a direction that won't work in the place where you actually are

It was a reasonable assumption and one almost all of us make because, ya know, you're here.

Assuming you were acting in a reasonable manner, that was the miss.

 

[LiverpoolMaster]

• Walk into a publishing house
• Help yourself to its resources and other's kindness
• Chide those who happen to notice you are working in a direction that won't work in the place where you actually are

It was a reasonable assumption and one almost all of us make because, ya know, you're here.

Assuming you were acting in a reasonable manner, that was the miss.

Er... it is perfectly 'reasonable' to visit these pages and join in the discussions without having any any intention whatsoever of 'publishing' (belly laughter from all points of the compass) on here.

What IS an 'unreasonable manner' is the apparent belief on the part of some members that they have carte blanche to self-appoint as site Gestapo and jump into a thread, hobnail boots first, without checking what has actually been said.

If you take even the smallest bother to look back on this thread (see posts 46 and 47), you'll see that it was 0000zing who had been 'chided' in the first place and in response he was only pointing out what he believed - as a matter of fact quite rightly - to be the site management position. They take NO position either on 'midwives' or lesbianism. And 'gross' had been tossed in as a particular member's opinion, considered wrongly to be applicable to all.

 

[Carnevil9]

Well, that's your personal take on it but it actually doesn't run foul of Lit. rules.

I guess Life's rich pageant means there are a thousand views as to what constitutes "gross", not just yours.

Somebody is either an REM fan, or a Pink Panther fan!

 

[Euphony]

Your snark makes it clear you aren't interested in coming to even a basic understanding of others rather than scoring internet points.

I am posting for clarity for others. Your biases are clear and show you aren't interested in honest, meaningful discussion so I leave you here.

Er... it is perfectly 'reasonable' to visit these pages and join in the discussions without having any any intention whatsoever of 'publishing' (belly laughter from all points of the compass) on here.

Reasonableness was only applicable to common sense and the majority assumption that if you are at LIT, you are working towards posting AT LIT and would want to conform to the guidelines OF LIT.

Also, that those offering help, tend to assume they are doing so FOR LIT. There was a spat of editors abused by off-siters and I don't know the forum every fully recovered.

But why ever concern yourself with this place? It's just here to serve.

Also, never said anything of the nature you implied. Just that offense over the assumption a majority of people here would naturally make seems building drama/creating a stir where there literally doesn't need to be one.

What IS an 'unreasonable manner' is the apparent belief on the part of some members that they have carte blanche to self-appoint as site Gestapo and jump into a thread, hobnail boots first, without checking what has actually been said.

Seems odd to simultaneously deride self-appointment "police" yet also expect policing of the thread by me by stating it as a failure of duty. (why address other's actions to me unless I am somehow responsible for them, which I am surely not (and you are smart enough to know this)

Excellent connotations by the way. You're keeping Goodwin's Law at the ready.

If you take even the smallest bother to look back on this thread (see posts 46 and 47), you'll see that it was 0000zing who had been 'chided' in the first place and in response he was only pointing out what he believed - as a matter of fact quite rightly - to be the site management position.

You hate others self-appointment yet you have self-appointed. And again, you bring up others thoughts and actions as someone else's responsibility other than their own. Seriously, pick a lane.

They take NO position either on 'midwives' or lesbianism. And 'gross' had been tossed in as a particular member's opinion, considered wrongly to be applicable to all.

You are a broken record so I will simply ask you to refer back to the same troublespots you had earlier.

Your tone implies you clearly won't so you certainly aren't worth my (or really much of anyone's) further time.

And this should be of great benefit to you as we are seemingly all in the wrong save yourself.

 

[000zing]

we are seemingly all in the wrong save yourself.

Good God. What a rant.

Well, YOU certainly are. Someone here appears to be protesting ever so slightly too much!

All I did was to point out to DarkS that his opinion was his own and not shared by everyone as his pronouncement purported to indicate. I also said that there were no prohibitions within Literotica relating to "community midwives" or "lesbians", which is a statement of fact, pure and simple. End of.

I can't see what on earth you're sounding off about.

Oh and by the way, looking in your posting record, I fail to see that you are in any way a more frequent or useful contributor to Story Ideas as compared with Liverpool, myself and many others. Perhaps a bit of humility before you start giving with the lectures..?

 

[DarkSollat]

All I did was to point out to DarkS that his opinion was his own and not shared by everyone as his pronouncement purported to indicate.

I wasn't indicating anything like that.

I also said that there were no prohibitions within Literotica relating to "community midwives" or "lesbians", which is a statement of fact, pure and simple. End of.

But you were indicating a midfive havinv sex with a mother next to a baby crying in craddle. This 8s certainly against Lit rules.

Also, as not all of us write for Lit it's fif me clear that the same rules apply to the discussion board.

 

[000zing]

1. You said it as a general statement. You did not use "in my opinion" or "I think". This implied that you thought your opinion (and that's all it was) was "of course" shared by everyone else. As the OP of this thread, I believe I am entitled to cast a little doubt on that.

2. Kindly show me where it is explicitly stated that mentioning babies crying in cots (and not remotely involved with sexual activity) is "against Lit rules". There is NO rule outrightly banning the mention of children... and finally I do not see where any "next to" is suggested.

 

[thebobber326]

It’s a great story!

I'm so glad you enjoyed it! It has a lot more chapters and counting, if you're interested!

 

[BrattyLinds]

Looking for ideas as regards settings/characters to feed into an N/C story about a lesbian sexual predator.

Have you ever watched Showtime's series The "L" Word? The character Shane could easily be written as a sexual predator. In the show, she was a "serial dater" (love 'em and leave 'em type) before her character evolved. To this pansexual, Katherine Moennig is a sexy woman too!

If one doesn't want actual fanfic, the character type could simply be inspiration.

 

[000zing]

No, one doesn't want puerile actual "fanfic".

Neither, for that matter, does one watch much TV coming from other than the UK. Sorry for pointing out that there is a world outside of the USA.

One was actually surprised to see this thread again - enough ideas were aired to meet its purpose. Thanks to all.

 

[BrattyLinds]

No, one doesn't want puerile actual "fanfic".

Neither, for that matter, does one watch much TV coming from other than the UK. Sorry for pointing out that there is a world outside of the USA.

One was actually surprised to see this thread again - enough ideas were aired to meet its purpose. Thanks to all.

No need to be rude.

 

[aToyEnjoyer]

Looking for ideas as regards settings/characters to feed into an N/C story about a lesbian sexual predator.

-A massage parlour setting where the masseuse drugs her clients with aphrodisiac aromas or massage oil. Perhaps restraining them while their mind is hazy, perhaps driving them wild at her touch until they're begging for relief, perhaps forcing them to serve her before that relief is given.

-A low-level office worker or janitor that plants cameras in the female bathrooms. When she catches the perfect blackmail material, perhaps a co-worker fucking the boss, perhaps a co-worker doing drugs, she finally works up the courage to fulfill her fantasies. Co-worker, who is theoretically her superior, is forced to serve her whenever she desires.

-A woman who trolls around clubs and bars for drunk young women late at night, perhaps even spiking their drinks. She pretends to be a friend or family member as she helps them to her car, and easily gets away with it thanks to people's prejudice.

-A border guard/security woman in a sketchy country that always volunteers to search female travelers. She makes up excuses to get attractive women taken in for a search, then cuffs them once they're alone and does as she desires. Her superiors turn a blind eye, or perhaps she bribes them since she's really only here for the women and not for the pay.

I'm sure some of these are unoriginal, I haven't even read the other replies in this thread, but hopefully something is decent.

 

[SteelPoint]

I like your third suggestion particularly. Plenty of drunk young women of weekend nights in city centres here in the UK, perhaps sad to say.

 

[SteelPoint]

"WomAn preys upon womEn"

Given the abysmal standard of English of the majority of Lit. users, I'd be surprised if they understand exactly what is meant. I imagine the third person singular S at the end of "preys" could he helping them out!

 

[RoperTrace]

-A massage parlour setting where the masseuse drugs her clients with aphrodisiac aromas or massage oil. Perhaps restraining them while their mind is hazy, perhaps driving them wild at her touch until they're begging for relief, perhaps forcing them to serve her before that relief is given.

-A low-level office worker or janitor that plants cameras in the female bathrooms. When she catches the perfect blackmail material, perhaps a co-worker fucking the boss, perhaps a co-worker doing drugs, she finally works up the courage to fulfill her fantasies. Co-worker, who is theoretically her superior, is forced to serve her whenever she desires.

-A woman who trolls around clubs and bars for drunk young women late at night, perhaps even spiking their drinks. She pretends to be a friend or family member as she helps them to her car, and easily gets away with it thanks to people's prejudice.

-A border guard/security woman in a sketchy country that always volunteers to search female travelers. She makes up excuses to get attractive women taken in for a search, then cuffs them once they're alone and does as she desires. Her superiors turn a blind eye, or perhaps she bribes them since she's really only here for the women and not for the pay.

I'm sure some of these are unoriginal, I haven't even read the other replies in this thread, but hopefully something is decent.

I like the massage parlor scenario. I've been toying with doing a similar story, except it's an acupuncture gathering with oils, aroma therapy and new-age music playing. A friend and her husband actually have one of these in their modern-log style house twice a month. They often have new people signing up, who frequent their regular restaurant/bar. It's in a very secluded spot in the mountains of Western Maryland/WV area. My story would be consensual, but maybe the special aromas loosen up the inhibitions a bit more.

 

[aToyEnjoyer]

I like the massage parlor scenario. I've been toying with doing a similar story, except it's an acupuncture gathering with oils, aroma therapy and new-age music playing. A friend and her husband actually have one of these in their modern-log style house twice a month. They often have new people signing up, who frequent their regular restaurant/bar. It's in a very secluded spot in the mountains of Western Maryland/WV area. My story would be consensual, but maybe the special aromas loosen up the inhibitions a bit more.

Definitely one that could lean a lot further toward consensual. Even if the clients come in without expecting anything sexual, the aromas and oils could give them that little push they need to ask for something more

Could even have some clients that don't fall for it, but get super worked up and need to release themselves in private afterward.

 

[SteelPoint]

In what way would "consensual" fit with the idea of a predator, you might struggle to explain?

 

[Dolly2]

Hi
Wrote a story about a lesbian rape that takes place at collage.
Lesbian Teacher vs sexy Blonde Coed

Might be what your looking for.

 

[RoperTrace]

In what way would "consensual" fit with the idea of a predator, you might struggle to explain?

It doesn't fit, I was just expanding on her idea of a massage parlour being how she preyed on lesbians. The non-consent only works for me when it's a shared fantasy. Rape: no; fantasy: yes.

 

[000zing]

So it doesn't fit the thread either, then.

 

[EchoBlue]

So the one thing I was impressed with in the original Purge movie was the final scenes between two suburban women... I guess I should put up a mild spoiler warning here?

Anyway, while I didn't think much of the movie, I did like the ending scenes where it turned into a less violent and more dramatic tension between two women, I've of whom was insanely jealous of the other and set her up as a target of these violent lunatics. It was about the only true note in the movie to me, these personal politics that felt like class warfare within the same general class, one person feeling that the other was lording her status over the other. Nutso stuff but true to human nature.

I think that kind of dynamic could lend itself to a more adults only level story. Neighborhood politics of social domination played out through sexual domination.