Exactly, for the people to complain that liberals are against speech when Trump wants to control what can be said, its a dizzying bit of non-logic to accuse us of what he does so often… more deflecting than anything
Because you don't like their rules.
If you walk into a Walmart. It's a Walmart...not the public space.
Yes, I get you have issues with people who don't let you post on their sites.
Cool
Abortion doesn't involve babies.
Ok, so the issue here is that you don’t know what the 1A is. 1A does not allow hate speech or to lie about people. That’s why Giuliani is broke.
I don't have an issue with it. I'm identifying it for what it is, anti-free speech censorship.
What do I say then? Please provide my quotes.
They aren't the public square.
Cool. A private company employs private company rules.
You're the one complaining about it.
I use medical terms. It's not a coping mechanism. Babies is a term for post pregnancy. It doesn't exist prior to that. Same with infant and child.
No one can be criminally charged for 1A.
MAGA's Agree, and think they should stop being protected as such.
They aren't protected as a public square. They are protected as social media companies.
Sure
Feel free to discuss abortion with a doctor. Specifically start with the murdering babies part. It will be a hoot.
He has not been convicted of rape. Do you really want to live in a world where anybody can make a buck by accusing someone with money that they were raped and based on their wild claims brand the person as a rapist? Calling names like saying someone is a racist when they are surrounded by friends from all races is pretty comical. The fact that he has "orange hair" as a genetic characteristic is a factor in what way? Who is the racist if people get critical comments based on their genetic appearance?
Saint_Ann syndrome rears it’s ugly battered head…again.
Newsflash:
70 million plus (“the majorityj”) just voted for a rapey, racist, misogynistic, corrupt orange traitor.
The look out the front door isn’t any different than on the typical message board.
You did.
It’s genetic? He was born with it?
Of course they can. See the Smith Act trials.
I’ll stand corrected and say a person can be charged for threatening violence.
Remember, there is no such thing as precedent any longer in the courts. Any current court can rule however they feel based on their own biases regardless of previous cases.
