women reporting increase in misogynistic posts since election

[ll74]

Why not??

Because you don't like their rules.

1) Can't be their space and the public square at the same time.

If you walk into a Walmart. It's a Walmart...not the public space.

2) doesn't matter, they're still anti-free speech.

Yes, I get you have issues with people who don't let you post on their sites.

Yes really. 100% actually.

Cool

Sure they do....you just have to stop lying to yourself about it as cope.

Abortion doesn't involve babies.

Whether you believe they do is irrelevant.

Babies occur after birth.

 

[UltraChad]

When he was running for POTUS in 2020 & 2024.

No he didn't.

She didn’t.

Censoring "hate" speech and "misinformation" whatever those are....is on it's face anti 1A.

 

[SavannaT]

Where did he do that?

Recently

His previous presidency

Here’s the thing.. ultimately only Trump has the freedom of speech without consequence, not us and not you, you can talk and say whatever but once its said it might come back to bite you.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

No he didn't.


Censoring "hate" speech and "misinformation" whatever those are....is on it's face anti 1A.

Ok, so the issue here is that you don’t know what the 1A is. 1A does not allow hate speech or to lie about people. That’s why Giuliani is broke.

 

[UltraChad]

Because you don't like their rules.

If you walk into a Walmart. It's a Walmart...not the public space.

That's not what you say when you tax them and make them follow public use laws like anti-discrimination and respect for any other rights out of a private business that uses any public access/services or is publicly traded.

Can't have it both ways. Again they can't be the public square AND censorious private platform.

Yes, I get you have issues with people who don't let you post on their sites.

I don't have an issue with it. I'm identifying it for what it is, anti-free speech censorship.

Why does that trigger you so much?

Abortion doesn't involve babies.

Whether you believe they do is irrelevant.

Babies occur after birth.

Whatever cope you gotta tell yourself bubba.

 

[UltraChad]

Recently

LOL holding reckless journalist accountable for their lies isn't anti-1A.

Put the propaganda outlets down, they have you deranged on derp.

His previous presidency

Where he literally supported 1A rights.

Here’s the thing.. ultimately only Trump has the freedom of speech without consequence, not us and not you,

This is the most unhinged delusion yet.

you can talk and say whatever but once its said it might come back to bite you.

And water is wet!!

 

[UltraChad]

Ok, so the issue here is that you don’t know what the 1A is.

You say that and then demonstrate it's you who doesn't know what 1A is.

1A does not allow hate speech or to lie about people. That’s why Giuliani is broke.

Sure it does.

That's why Giuliani wasn't criminally charged for anything he said.

Go learn what 1A is and try again son.....

 

[ll74]

That's not what you say when you tax them and make them follow public use laws like anti-discrimination and respect for any other rights out of a private business that uses any public access/services or is publicly traded.

What do I say then? Please provide my quotes.

Can't have it both ways. Again they can't be the public square AND censorious private platform.

They aren't the public square.

I don't have an issue with it. I'm identifying it for what it is, anti-free speech censorship.

Cool. A private company employs private company rules.

Why does that trigger you so much?

You're the one complaining about it.

Whatever cope you gotta tell yourself bubba.

I use medical terms. It's not a coping mechanism. Babies is a term for post pregnancy. It doesn't exist prior to that. Same with infant and child.

The coping/emotional angle is the one that suggest abortions murder babies aka infantcide. Infantcide is illegal in every state without exception.

 

[Typo Fu Master]

I don't support misogyny.

I don't support misandry.

I don't support "hate speech", whatever you may define the term as.

I do, however, 100% support a person's right to speak their mind, without censorship, even if I disagree or find it offensive.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

You say that and then demonstrate it's you who doesn't know what 1A is.



Sure it does.

That's why Giuliani wasn't criminally charged for anything he said.

Go learn what 1A is and try again son.....

No one can be criminally charged for 1A.

 

[UltraChad]

They aren't the public square.

MAGA's Agree, and think they should stop being protected as such.
(D)'s:REEEEEEEE REEEEEE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

You're the one complaining about it.

Where did I ever complain? I just pointed out the left is wildly anti-free speech it got the lefties in here triggered AF.

The coping/emotional angle is the one that suggest abortions murder babies aka infantcide. Infantcide is illegal in every state without exception.

Whatever cope you need to chug bud.

 

[UltraChad]

No one can be criminally charged for 1A.

Correct.

I don't think anyone said that anyone could.

 

[ll74]

MAGA's Agree, and think they should stop being protected as such.
(D)'s:REEEEEEEE REEEEEE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

They aren't protected as a public square. They are protected as social media companies.

Where did I ever complain? I just pointed out the left is wildly anti-free speech it got the lefties in here triggered AF.

Sure

Whatever cope you need to chug bud.

Feel free to discuss abortion with a doctor. Specifically start with the murdering babies part. It will be a hoot.

Fyi - I have zero issues with a woman terminating a pregnancy.

 

[Deleted member 6873114]

Saint_Ann syndrome rears it’s ugly battered head…again.



Newsflash:

70 million plus (“the majorityj”) just voted for a rapey, racist, misogynistic, corrupt orange traitor.

The look out the front door isn’t any different than on the typical message board.

He has not been convicted of rape. Do you really want to live in a world where anybody can make a buck by accusing someone with money that they were raped and based on their wild claims brand the person as a rapist? Calling names like saying someone is a racist when they are surrounded by friends from all races is pretty comical. The fact that he has "orange hair" as a genetic characteristic is a factor in what way? Who is the racist if people get critical comments based on their genetic appearance?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Correct.

I don't think anyone said that anyone could.

You did.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

He has not been convicted of rape. Do you really want to live in a world where anybody can make a buck by accusing someone with money that they were raped and based on their wild claims brand the person as a rapist? Calling names like saying someone is a racist when they are surrounded by friends from all races is pretty comical. The fact that he has "orange hair" as a genetic characteristic is a factor in what way? Who is the racist if people get critical comments based on their genetic appearance?

It’s genetic? He was born with it?

 

[Lazaran]

He has not been convicted of rape. Do you really want to live in a world where anybody can make a buck by accusing someone with money that they were raped and based on their wild claims brand the person as a rapist? Calling names like saying someone is a racist when they are surrounded by friends from all races is pretty comical. The fact that he has "orange hair" as a genetic characteristic is a factor in what way? Who is the racist if people get critical comments based on their genetic appearance?

1) The word used was “rapey” - as in sexual assault - as in “Grabbing” women by the “pussy” because “when your a star”…

2) A jury in a civil case also found that DonOld HAD sexually assaulted E. Jean Carroll. There were no “wild claims”, just testimony that a jury found compelling.

3) “corrupt orange traitor” was the phrase used - and “orange” was only used for identifying purposes.

Hope that ^ helps

 

[Lance_Castro]

Boring thread. Trannies telling old trump rape stories sucks.

I thought maybe butters got misogynized out back of the Feed Shop again.

Had my Jergens out and my sock ready.

 

[Politruk]

No one can be criminally charged for 1A.

Of course they can. See the Smith Act trials.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Of course they can. See the Smith Act trials.

I’ll stand corrected and say a person can be charged for threatening violence.

 

[eric_erosfan]

Of course they can. See the Smith Act trials.

Remember, there is no such thing as precedent any longer in the courts. Any current court can rule however they feel based on their own biases regardless of previous cases.

 

[UltraChad]

They aren't protected as a public square. They are protected as social media companies.

Yes they are it's called sec 230.

Sure

Is what it is.

Feel free to discuss abortion with a doctor. Specifically start with the murdering babies part. It will be a hoot.

Fyi - I have zero issues with a woman terminating a pregnancy.

Whatever confirmation bias you need to support your butchering of human life.

A doctor and feminist ideology decides your morals. We get it.

 

[UltraChad]

You did.

No, I did not.

 

[ll74]

Whatever confirmation bias you need to support your butchering of human life.

A doctor and feminist ideology decides your morals. We get it.

I don't have an issue with a woman terminating her pregnancy. That is why I don't talk of butchering or murdering or calling a fetus a baby or launch into histrionics.

You are the one trying to find ways to vilify me. I don't need to cope with your issues. I do, however,.enjoy pointing out histrionics.

 

[UltraChad]

I don't have an issue with a woman terminating her pregnancy.

I understand you don't have any issues with vacuuming tiny brains out and cutting them up into chunks.

No histrionics, just your denial of reality to feel good about butchering babies.

You are the one trying to find ways to vilify me.

You did that to yourself. And keep doing over and over again you'll probably do it again.

I do, however,.enjoy pointing out histrionics.

I understand you like to think you found some.

But I bet you won't go watch videos of them chopping up a 9mo "TOTLALY NOT A BABY" ...listen to it gasp and try to scream, it's heart rate go through the roof when they start cutting it up. YOU SUPPORT THAT ALL THE WAY BUDDY TELL US AGAIN!!