JMohegan
.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2006
- Posts
- 8,226
Different strokes, and whatnot.Chicklet said:heh I don't think I'd ever play with a top who wasn't at least half playing to satisfy me...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Different strokes, and whatnot.Chicklet said:heh I don't think I'd ever play with a top who wasn't at least half playing to satisfy me...
I agree - however, my seemingly endless study of the human animal pointed me to one of two ideas - one, the bunny flogger was meant to train the skin or train clumsy dominants, get a sub used to light touches and rhythm, or let a dom/me with no grace get used to the idea of a flogger without dealing a stinkpile of damage.Netzach said:If it is, I think it's really lousy to play with someone casually who doesn't want to be your sub, and not go to their level because you want to "teach them something" - I think it's really D/s presumptuous. I'd be really REALLY pissed then, because I want to bottom and be suspended and I don't want to be Dominated.
I could have slept through a hundred pro sessions claiming "I'm trying to frustrate you" - unless that person really wants to be my slave boy, that's not a reasonable response. If I don't want to play to that person's level, I should not be playing.
JMohegan said:Different strokes, and whatnot.![]()
the captians wench said:They're great for warm ups, cool downs, or sensation play, but when I'm getting flogged baby I wanna feel it for a couple days!
No, I was talking solely about casual play with a non-partner. Negotiated, episode-specific, like Chicklet's encounter being discussed on the thread.Netzach said:Wait, no, this is curious to me.
Do you mean that even in your non-casual play, you've never found yourself tweaking the play toward the really ecstatic reactions you're getting, or finding that you're developing a taste for things your sub has a strong reaction to, positive reaction for the sake of this argument?