You, me, God, and the universe.

[Saint Peter]

Mostly

Yeah.

Mostly.

 

[Emerson40]

Lit is so polarized now it is impossible to talk about any topic without political assignment being brought up and scrutinized.

Cain and Abel? Not sure. I am not my conservative right wing religious nutjob brother's keeper.

Nailed it. A good number of threads don't make it past the second or third post without name calling and a pissing contest starting.

It's why a bunch of folks who could contribute don't even bother.

 

[Pookie]

Nailed it. A good number of threads don't make it past the second or third post without name calling and a pissing contest starting.

It's why a bunch of folks who could contribute don't even bother.

The only fun ones are the drunk Ish threads.

 

[pointless]

Lit is so polarized now it is impossible to talk about any topic without political assignment being brought up and scrutinized.

Cain and Abel? Not sure. I am not my conservative right wing religious nutjob brother's keeper.

this is why embracing nonsense and absurdity is the only true way to get through life.

 

[Emerson40]

The only fun ones are the drunk Ish threads.

Sure.

But that's usually because of the mini, side-threads and off-topic posts happening within the thread - the derailments, as it were.

They can be quite entertaining and fun, the good stuff usually happening a page or two in, after the initial name calling and obligatory Franzia posts are made.

 

[Pookie]

Sure.

But that's usually because of the mini, side-threads and off-topic posts happening within the thread - the derailments, as it were.

They can be quite entertaining and fun, the good stuff usually happening a page or two in, after the opening name calling and obligatory Franzia posts are made.

Occasionally you get some page one gold, like the time Ish was banned.

 

[RobDownSouth]

The only fun ones are the drunk Ish threads.

Agreed.
http://i1239.photobucket.com/albums/ff502/Soonyigump/IshmaelThread_zpsw7akd7w0.gif

 

[nerfhearder]

I try to just find someone actually willing to discuss whatever topic and go with that. Maybe a couple shots at dumbasses like the OP just for fun. Going off on the political tangents isn't much fun to me at all.

 

[hashtag4]

I try to just find someone actually willing to discuss whatever topic and go with that. Maybe a couple shots at dumbasses like the OP just for fun. Going off on the political tangents isn't much fun to me at all.

I make a habit of reading your posts because, despite the fact that I don't like you on a personal level, I find you to be an intelligent and well informed poster.

But as far as this topic is concerned, I haven't seen you come up with any ideas or make any comments in any threadsm which makes me suspect that you're not equally skilled in certain "humanistic" areas, so to speak.
Are you sure that your calling the OP dumbass is the right move in this case?

And the last paragraph applies to the other smartasses and trolls too

 

[hashtag4]

Nailed it. A good number of threads don't make it past the second or third post without name calling and a pissing contest starting.

It's why a bunch of folks who could contribute don't even bother.

Oh, the irony..

And what does your Highnness contribute to political threads? Other than littering them with pictures of buttholes or homophobic cartoons and gifs?

I doubt that you're one of those savants "who could contribute but don't even bother".
Because as far as I"ve seen, your main "contributions" to this site are threads about vaginas, how to fap or have anal sex, or posts in which you advise posters about which anal lube is the best one on the market.

 

[about_average]

I have made two statements.

1. A negative cannot be proven.

That does NOT say, or imply, that something does or doesn't exist. Or to put it another way, the inability to prove one thing does not automatically prove the converse.

2. Theoretical Physics as we understand it today suggests there is a 'creative' force at work WRT the beginning of the universe. If true you can name it anything you want and "God" is as good a name as any. That creative force, whatever form it may take, does NOT imply a 'personal God' that is taught by most religions.

That's it sparky, that's all I've said. I wasn't using 'code words' or 'dog whistles.' (Something the left is determined to find in anything anybody has to say. Probably as a result of all those correspondence "Mind Reading" course they subscribe to.)

Maybe you should go back and read what you wrote.
You stated, very clearly, that there's no chance atheists are right about there being no God.
You didn't say they can't prove there's no God, you just said there's no chance they are right.

I don't even know why you inserted "A negative can't be proven" as it has nothing to do with atheists' conviction that there's no god. No more than believers can prove there is.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

After much consideration, I believe it is clear that the so-called "big bang theory" is bullshit. It is the fanciful notion of a Catholic priest that took his knowledge of physics and imagined a theory to fit the narrative in Genesis. He was sophisticated and he was tremendously clever but he was nonetheless a charlatan.