IWroteThis
Mature Amateur
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2024
- Posts
- 524
That's fine, if you just want to feel good about meaningless numbers.The ratio doesn't need to tell you why when it's 1:20. You can tell by the average rating that is it's at 2.0 or relatively low, the readers are angry or irritated. It it's 4.0 then they're generally enthusiastically enjoying it.
But if the ratio is 1:200 or higher, then the audience isn't impressed enough to bother.
The tight ratio of 1:20 means you've struck a nerve in many of them, for good or bad. But you DID IT!
Stephen King might write a good book and turn it into a movie. And if most of the audience vomits during the horror scenes, you can't say they "loved" the movie. But he DID IT, and he got the reaction he wanted from them.
My story, "Pavlov's Dog - 750 Words" in Loving Wives was written with that goal in mind: to get a reaction from the trolls! It's rated 2.3/834 votes with 18,500 views. That's a 1:22 ratio. And the low rating means I stuck a nerve with them! It lit a fire under them to vote!
Once again, it doesn't differentiate between story quality and teaser attraction. A good story that attracts too broad of an audience is going to have a lower ratio than a bad story that only attracts a narrow audience that matches what you wrote.
So, that lower ratio might actually be telling you that your combination of title, description, and category sucked, and you failed to attract a large portion of your potential audience.