Alright, own up. What did you guys do!?

[Luna_Wolf72]

I agree with the above sentiment but probably not for the reasons stated...

 

[1FreakyGirl]

LOL!

Believe me, it hurt to type it.

I think we took this joke a little too far. I just threw up in my mouth a little bit seeing my name tied into one of those things.

 

[SoulWeaver]

Me throw poo at apes on way out....

Mmmmm pooooooo ... oh wait. will the mods delete this thread now?

 

[girlsmiley]

Mmmmm pooooooo ... oh wait. will the mods delete this thread now?

shit-stirrer

 

[SoulWeaver]

shit-stirrer

What a "stink" joke .....

 

[ShadowFighter15]

Quick question; I assume Light Ice is the guy who derailed the thread this one's about, or was someone calling him Jake as a joke?

*really wishes he'd seen more of the thread so he had first-hand knowledge of what happened*

Also, I think the Pun Police want a word with SoulWeaver and girlsmiley.

 

[Alana_]

Throwing poo at monkeys? Is that bestiality? Is that a rule breaker?


Wait for it..!






No the threads still here.

 

[girlsmiley]

What a "stink" joke .....

That's even crappier than mine

 

[SoulWeaver]

Quick question; I assume Light Ice is the guy who derailed the thread this one's about, or was someone calling him Jake as a joke?
*really wishes he'd seen more of the thread so he had first-hand knowledge of what happened*
Also, I think the Pun Police want a word with SoulWeaver and girlsmiley.

No Light isn't Jake. He snapped at me for no reason so I snapped back. I shouldn't have, but I did.

That's even crappier than mine

Aw crap, you win, I give up

 

[Vail_Indigo]

You know what I don't get?

I don't get why women who post nude avatars up and name themselves ridiculous shit like "fuckmeat" are surprised when they get emailed a bunch of lewd and unintelligible shit from the male members of a porn board.

That's what I don't get.

First, as Ahren said, we aren't surprised, we just think the guys are idiots and assholes none the less.
Second, is my name in some way suggestive? Because I get plenty of them too. The name of the woman may affect the particular verbiage of the email, but it isn't required to set it off. All thats required is that the target have boobs.

 

[fuckmeat]

You know what I don't get?

I don't get why women who post nude avatars up and name themselves ridiculous shit like "fuckmeat" are surprised when they get emailed a bunch of lewd and unintelligible shit from the male members of a porn board.

That's what I don't get.

I'm not surprised about receiving unsolicited messages. What amuses me and nudges me closer to the lesbian end of my bi spectrum is the moronic bait they expect me to leap for. This isn't any porn board, this is LITerotica, where guys should get the message that basic literacy is an asset here and arguably a more obvious one than the grainy cock shots they fall back on in lieu of personalities.

Course it's the true needledicks who hide behind pictures of cocktails.

 

[fuckmeat]

But if they wanted to stop getting them, making smarter name choices would definitely be a good place to start.

They don't.

Like dressing in frumpy clothes and shunning make-up should be the only way I can expect to walk around the street without getting molested? The 'she's asking for it' mentality than men attach to fashionable clothing and pride in appearance is an extremely sexist point of view. If you could be easily overpowered by virtually any member of the opposite sex, a heterosexual gender that's made a religion out of judging and objectifying women, who prides themselves on predatory behaviour and conquests (maybe not in earshot of their significant others but in bars and other hetero-male oriented environments) you would not feel like this.

I came here so I can be who I am, vacuum packaging and all. I'm not going to curb that because there are fucktarded members here who think it's all for their benefit. And I do get PMs that are not fucktarded. Those I respond to politely, in the same way I'd thank someone in RL for a compliment more sophisticated than 'nice rack.' The thread was just supposed to be a light hearted look at the literary equivalent of 'nice rack' that these guys spam female sounding usernames with.

And also, some of the messages are blatantly sent by creepy guys looking for... ahem... easy meat (pun fully intended). I think threads like the Asshat one I linked in post 1 also serve as cautionary lessons in what not to trust in and respond to.

 

[fuckmeat]

Sharkiness?

Defense?

Stalked?

It's a fucking message board. Use the ignore feature. Wait, if you use the ignore feature you can't see all the attention you're getting, right?

Right?

Are you getting it, yet?





No. I didn't assume so.

As I said early on in the now deleted Fucktard thread (I know, how convenient) I do use the ignore feature and 'report abuse' features when it comes to malevolent and sick PMs. I am equanimitous about the fact my chosen username invites that kind of 'abuse.' None of that has any relevance to or bearing on my posting a thread to look at some of the giggleworthy turds that litter my inbox.

How ClearDiamond and others that jake has targeted choose to deal with that should not affect how culpable jake is as fucktard of the week. And incidentally, using the ignore feature means you don't get the abuse but also that you can't flag and report it. This user clearly needs banning, which requires people like ClearDiamond to go to the trouble of receiving and opening PMs before reporting the user.

 

[Cleardiamond]

Do you think I should cook him some fucken eggs? Hehe.

"You're a fucken woman in your bikini! Imma send you a fucktarded pm! You asked for it! Durrrrr.... "

Some men act positively MEDIEVAL.

OMG.. this is exactly how I feel when I get the fuckie PMs... Fail

Ugh ...Grognad throw you over shoulder and take you back to cave ...
For his widdle woman of course .......

LMAO

No need to offend the Muslim states now.

Anyway, I think that if you act like shit, you're going to be treated like shit.

Like your name is ohhhhhhh 1FreakyGirl then you're going to get PMs from all sorts of idiots. But like Light Ice said, I have an ignore feature which I can and HAVE used.

I picked this name and I'm prepared to live with the consequences of it.

We DID use the ignor feature.. it didn't work.. he just followed us around.. making everyone else's life on lit more annoying

Nice shoes. Want to fuck?

Been there done that... NEXT!

Quick question; I assume Light Ice is the guy who derailed the thread this one's about, or was someone calling him Jake as a joke?

*really wishes he'd seen more of the thread so he had first-hand knowledge of what happened*

Also, I think the Pun Police want a word with SoulWeaver and girlsmiley.

Hehehehe.. I LOL'd

 

[girlsmiley]

Also, I think the Pun Police want a word with SoulWeaver and girlsmiley.

"And but one word with one of us? Couple it with something; make it a word and a blow."

 

[Light Ice]

I'm not surprised about receiving unsolicited messages.

I expected this to be the case. You're clearly bright and aware and you'd have to be at the bottom of the spectrum on both counts not to expect the PMs. My question to you is why do you seem to care so much about your thread trashing the PM senders? Why was the show and tell necessary at all?

What amuses me and nudges me closer to the lesbian end of my bi spectrum is the moronic bait they expect me to leap for. This isn't any porn board, this is LITerotica, where guys should get the message that basic literacy is an asset here and arguably a more obvious one than the grainy cock shots they fall back on in lieu of personalities.

No, this website is a porn board. You can attempt to convince yourself of what it should be if you'd like but the links here are full of filth from top to bottom and almost all of it is classless. There is an entire section on the story side of things devoted to incest porn and half of those stories are written by morons. Again, none of this is news to you. I don't even believe that -you- believe that you should have any higher expectations.

 

[Light Ice]

Like dressing in frumpy clothes and shunning make-up should be the only way I can expect to walk around the street without getting molested? The 'she's asking for it' mentality than men attach to fashionable clothing and pride in appearance is an extremely sexist point of view.

Sure. Of course, I didn't say you deserved to be treated that way by any men and this -isn't- you walking down a street. You're in a porn board and fully aware that people come here specifically to act filthy. There's a difference there and you're aware of that.

What I did say, however, was that I didn't understand your expectations and I certainly don't understand your way of handling the crap side of the internet. It's all suspect. My best guess is that you secretly like getting the PMs either for a giggle or for some other reason.

And I can get why you'd feel it was entertaining to trash someone publicly. I just wouldn't take that route myself and am a little surprised that you would.

If you could be easily overpowered by virtually any member of the opposite sex, a heterosexual gender that's made a religion out of judging and objectifying women, who prides themselves on predatory behaviour and conquests (maybe not in earshot of their significant others but in bars and other hetero-male oriented environments) you would not feel like this.

I'd like to believe, honestly, that I would feel differently. I don't get the outrage in this instance. At all. If you were receiving a bombard of graphic (and awful) messages at home? Yeah, I'd get that. But here?

You already said you expected it.

I came here so I can be who I am, vacuum packaging and all. I'm not going to curb that because there are fucktarded members here who think it's all for their benefit. And I do get PMs that are not fucktarded. Those I respond to politely, in the same way I'd thank someone in RL for a compliment more sophisticated than 'nice rack.'

They come here to be perverts. Does that make their attempts any less awful? No. Does it excuse them? No.

The thread was just supposed to be a light hearted look at the literary equivalent of 'nice rack' that these guys spam female sounding usernames with.

Well, that I get. It just seems like somewhere along the way towards those intentions you began to take it seriously. Again, that's what got my attention.

And also, some of the messages are blatantly sent by creepy guys looking for... ahem... easy meat (pun fully intended). I think threads like the Asshat one I linked in post 1 also serve as cautionary lessons in what not to trust in and respond to.

I think your thread doesn't serve much purpose in that regard. The blatant creeps are easy to spot and avoid, as you've demonstrated. Well-written creeps, however, can sneak up on girls here. It's happened a lot from what I've witnessed.

This happens to men, too, of course. It's just more likely to occur here for a bunch of reasons. If you want to chalk that up as a "men are pigs" conversation, go ahead. I'd rather stay fixed on this topic than touch that one and get sidetracked.

 

[Light Ice]

How ClearDiamond and others that jake has targeted choose to deal with that should not affect how culpable jake is as fucktard of the week. And incidentally, using the ignore feature means you don't get the abuse but also that you can't flag and report it. This user clearly needs banning, which requires people like ClearDiamond to go to the trouble of receiving and opening PMs before reporting the user.

I just don't see how he's a danger or harm to anyone. Stupid? Yes, he's clearly stupid.

However, if every woman ignored him than he'd just be another idiot in your PM box. Banning him wouldn't solve anything because he'd just make another account.

 

[Light Ice]

First, as Ahren said, we aren't surprised, we just think the guys are idiots and assholes none the less.

Fair.

Second, is my name in some way suggestive? Because I get plenty of them too. The name of the woman may affect the particular verbiage of the email, but it isn't required to set it off. All thats required is that the target have boobs.

Your name? No. The suggestive part is how you bounce through thirty threads at a time talking about fucking women. That'd probably get a fair bit of attention from guys. Especially idiots.

 

[girlsmiley]

Sure. Of course, I didn't say you deserved to be treated that way by any men ....

Why don't you just quit while you're a head

 

[fuckmeat]

There would have been no call for me to appear to be 'taking the thread seriously' if jake hadn't showed up and started shouting about how awful and mean and nasty the thread was. All I ever intended was for it to become like the Asshat one, it was other people who provoked and demanded debate. And I will defend my position if that happens. It doesn't suddenly mean I view the thread as a surrogate child that needs protecting, more than when I see unmitigated BS on a thread I've posted I feel a responsibility not to let it stand unchallenged. Now you've made it your turn and fine, whatever, but I never sought this debate.

 

[fuckmeat]

I just don't see how he's a danger or harm to anyone. Stupid? Yes, he's clearly stupid.

However, if every woman ignored him than he'd just be another idiot in your PM box. Banning him wouldn't solve anything because he'd just make another account.

He's not a danger but trolls like that can be seriously disruptive to forum communities, drive away members (CD is already on a semi-hiatus as a result, or would be if I hadn't started this thread). Plus as you've likely never been on the receiving end of a fire and brimstone judgemental post stalker, again you're pontificating about shit you have zero experience of and perspective on. It's knowing that you're speaking from a stereotypical hetero male point of view that makes your flogging of this topic so obnoxious and ignorant.

But hey, I'm the maso here. Bring it.

 

[Ahren]

Like dressing in frumpy clothes and shunning make-up should be the only way I can expect to walk around the street without getting molested? The 'she's asking for it' mentality than men attach to fashionable clothing and pride in appearance is an extremely sexist point of view. If you could be easily overpowered by virtually any member of the opposite sex, a heterosexual gender that's made a religion out of judging and objectifying women, who prides themselves on predatory behaviour and conquests (maybe not in earshot of their significant others but in bars and other hetero-male oriented environments) you would not feel like this.

Man, I went to sleep last night right after I made my last post here and while I was lying in bed I was like "I should go back and nip the 'women who dress provocatively ask to be raped' comparison in the bud before it even starts." I then decided I was too lazy. I guess I should be less lazy.

 

[fuckmeat]

And I can get why you'd feel it was entertaining to trash someone publicly. I just wouldn't take that route myself and am a little surprised that you would.

For the absolute last and final time, for your benefit and every other illiterate moron's...

I stated clearly in post 1 of the Fucktard PM thread that there was to be NO naming and shaming of the people who send the PMs. There was to be NO public trashing of anyone, however eminantly deserved and NONE took place.

 

[fuckmeat]

Man, I went to sleep last night right after I made my last post here and while I was lying in bed I was like "I should go back and nip the 'women who dress provocatively ask to be raped' comparison in the bud before it even starts." I then decided I was too lazy. I guess I should be less lazy.

It's a valid comparison. What's the point of Lit at all if female users feel the need to swathe themselves in genderneutral usernames and virtual cyberburhkas to avoid being a target of spam PMers. And it is spam, which should technically not be permitted.

And may I reiterate, I never instigated this whole fucking debate to start with.