It is our right as citizens plain and simple.
Only because the 2nd Amendment exists. My thesis is that the amendment is pointless. Legal arguments are irrelevant to that purely political discussion.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is our right as citizens plain and simple.
So it would seem that you disagree with the majority decision Heller v. DC?
Guns are politically useless. I believe that was the opening. Totally on topic. In the end, Mao was corect. Power comes from the barrel of a gun.
Good thing Trump just signed a law that allows lunatics to buy guns.And in this country the forces of the state always have more and better guns, as well as organization, training and discipline. Only a lunatic would try to fight them.
And in this country the forces of the state always have more and better guns, as well as organization, training and discipline. Only a lunatic would try to fight them.
Why is there such fear of your neighbor being armed with a pistol or rifle and yet such comfort in your government being armed with armor personnel carriers and tanks?
Which of these two groups in the U.S.A. have a history of suppressing and waging genocide on groups of people living in this land?
Both.
Well, given the 2nd amendment was intended to allow the citizens of this glorious Republic to defend themselves from tyrannical government, seems a very good argument for extending the 2nd amendment to include everything short of nukes.
Oh yeah! This is so cool. Personally, I don't want artillery for myself personally but a grenade launcher would be fun. Could use it for duck shooting as well
Why is there such fear of your neighbor being armed with a pistol or rifle and yet such comfort in your government being armed with armor personnel carriers and tanks?
Which of these two groups in the U.S.A. have a history of suppressing and waging genocide on groups of people living in this land?
And so you sleep well knowing the government will do the right thing and protect you?
I wish to remind you of something that you should know very well, but often appear to talk as if you have forgotten:
You do realize, don't you, that your guns are politically useless?
Because the neighbor is a wacko and the military is not a neighbor.Why is there such fear of your neighbor being armed with a pistol or rifle and yet such comfort in your government being armed with armor personnel carriers and tanks?
Which of these two groups in the U.S.A. have a history of suppressing and waging genocide on groups of people living in this land?
I think Gavrilo Princip, Giuseppe Zangara, Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan, John Wilkes Booth, Mustafa Abu al-Yazid (a not large list I know) would disagree with you.
Not that I'm defending their actions, however there were definitely political ramifications after their shots were made.
To quote the gentle soul - "Outstanding. Those individuals showed what one motivated Marine and his rifle can do. And before you ladies leave my Island, you will all be able to do the same thing."
Only because the 2nd Amendment exists. My thesis is that the amendment is pointless. Legal arguments are irrelevant to that purely political discussion.