twelveoone
ground zero
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2004
- Posts
- 5,882
re:I'm trying to read through this 'short' paper, but it's proving difficult.
http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/Some Problems of Generative Poetics.pdf
"It is necessary now to assign a theoretical status to all these rules that determined the generation of literary texts. Different view-points have been mentioned in this paper: "literary" rules (if they are rules) are part of performance: this implies that they are only specific uses of the rules of grammar and specific violations of them (under socio-cultural conditions). these rules are part of a specific grammar of 'poetic competence'. which contains these specific rules. This grammar is based on (intersects with) the grammar of 'normal' language but is not a part of it. The additional rules formulated in it either replace or transform the rules of non-literary discourse or simply cause their elimination."
But I'm most interested in the genealogy of the poetic aesthetic, so I don't know if this will help at all.
Dated, too much technical jargon (I am not in that field) , too many off page references I do not have access to. Too many exceptions.
Thanks, anyway.