Bistro Bijou

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just popping in to say a quick goodbye to Hom, Sassy and UYS. Y'all have made me smile and it's been fun.

All the best!

Sara

*blink*

Uh, bye? :confused:

Sara, if you are leaving, you will be missed. Your wit was a welcome addition around here. :(
 
If anyone wants to stay in touch with me, please PM me with your email address sometime in the next couple of days.
Sara is gone. I understand that it may seem that the few of us who are truly outraged are being overdramatic. But once it's established that the mods are willing to edit and remove anything they find embarrassing to themselves or challenging to their regime, I have to find someplace else to be.

I'll say more later, but I'm busy packing up.
 
I am utterly and completely lost. Probably not surprising, as this is one of perhaps five threads I keep even vague track of (here, 5x5, 5x5 discussion on occassion, I am Music, and another music thread whose name I can't recall).

This thread is going to suck if you people split. Maybe you can just come over to BDSM and we'll start another thread there, eh?
 
Yes, Bistros without hostesses and friends can be lonely places. I'm around, I don't suppose that will effect anyone, because apparently I'm one of those at fault...

I am condemned by my silence as surely as I would be sentenced by my words.
 
Yes, Bistros without hostesses and friends can be lonely places. I'm around, I don't suppose that will effect anyone, because apparently I'm one of those at fault...

I am condemned by my silence as surely as I would be sentenced by my words.

Are you? tut tut a plague of locusts on you madam!
I'm staying just to piss people off ...... care to join me?
 
If anyone wants to stay in touch with me, please PM me with your email address sometime in the next couple of days.
Sara is gone. I understand that it may seem that the few of us who are truly outraged are being overdramatic. But once it's established that the mods are willing to edit and remove anything they find embarrassing to themselves or challenging to their regime, I have to find someplace else to be.

I'll say more later, but I'm busy packing up.

Once more, to get the facts straight:
I just checked the mod queue (a forum that won't show up unless you're a mod) I checked two pages, back to Dec 14th, and I see no moved poetry forum posts or threads. Mods cannot permanently delete a post/thread. It only gets moved to the mod queue. Ask a mod on another forum to check for you.
By the way, nothing I said embarrassed me, including my drunken rant, which I left up for all to see. So what was deleted, edited, etc? Moved something? Maybe so. But I don't edit other posters' posts, unless there's a link or info that should not be there.
 
Yeah, right. We've always been at war with East Asia. Got it.

Once more, to get the facts straight:
I just checked the mod queue (a forum that won't show up unless you're a mod) I checked two pages, back to Dec 14th, and I see no moved poetry forum posts or threads. Mods cannot permanently delete a post/thread. It only gets moved to the mod queue. Ask a mod on another forum to check for you.
By the way, nothing I said embarrassed me, including my drunken rant, which I left up for all to see. So what was deleted, edited, etc? Moved something? Maybe so. But I don't edit other posters' posts, unless there's a link or info that should not be there.

I don't know how the logging is set up around here, nor who has console access to the actual machinery, but if what you say is "true" then the logs have been compromised. The drunken rant was deleted by removing the entire new-years thread - along with all the inoffensive well-wishes of others toward one another. Now they're back, but they were gone.

Mayhap they were "un-deleted," but the original deletion was nonetheless quite real.

Mayhap someone of higher rank is leaning, ever so slightly, on the local bureaucracy?

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes coitum?

All the jumping on Bijou in "hole with your hole" was deleted and then re-instated in a new thread of the same name and attributed to her, from which all elements the original thread had been expunged. That thread was moved from the "proper" area to the hangout, then back again.

Strangely, when an un-medicated schizophrenic flames people around here and makes like a harpy all over otherwise enjoyable threads, you are mute; let anyone else tell her to put a sock in it, however, and both of your size fourteens will be distending their gizzard.

I feel that following the eviction of the current Regime in D.C, they've found a new home here - even Gonzales.

While I love poetry and prose, that love's seriously outweighed by what I'm seeing 'round here of late.

Snood
 
Last edited:
All the jumping on Bijou in "hole with your hole" was deleted and then re-instated in a new thread of the same name and attributed to her, from which all elements the original thread had been expunged. That thread was moved from the "proper" area to the hangout, then back again.
Exactly, Snood. Text is moved and reattributed, in a very different (and, frankly, clueless) context. If one happens to find the thread in the new area, it kind of cranks up with a comment in vacuo. Of course, being out of context, that seems at least odd, if not deranged.

But, apparently, the argument is that "your posts are still there."

There. Somewhere, I guess. Apparently that is OK with both the mods and the owners of the site.
 
I don't know how the logging is set up around here, nor who has console access to the actual machinery, but if what you say is "true" then the logs have been compromised. The drunken rant was deleted by removing the entire new-years thread - along with all the inoffensive well-wishes of others toward one another. Now they're back, but they were gone.

Mayhap they were "un-deleted," but the original deletion was nonetheless quite real.

Mayhap someone of higher rank is leaning, ever so slightly, on the local bureaucracy?

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes coitum?

All the jumping on Bijou in "hole with your hole" was deleted and then re-instated in a new thread of the same name and attributed to her, from which all elements the original thread had been expunged. That thread was moved from the "proper" area to the hangout, then back again.

Strangely, when an un-medicated schizophrenic flames people around here and makes like a harpy all over otherwise enjoyable threads, you are mute; let anyone else tell her to put a sock in it, however, and both of your size fourteens will be distending their gizzard.

I feel that following the eviction of the current Regime in D.C, they've found a new home here - even Gonzales.

While I love poetry and prose, that love's seriously outweighed by what I'm seeing 'round here of late.

Snood

Exactly, Snood. Text is moved and reattributed, in a very different (and, frankly, clueless) context. If one happens to find the thread in the new area, it kind of cranks up with a comment in vacuo. Of course, being out of context, that seems at least odd, if not deranged.

But, apparently, the argument is that "your posts are still there."

There. Somewhere, I guess. Apparently that is OK with both the mods and the owners of the site.

WTF guys! What "I'm seeing around here of late" is a bunch of serious shit over nothing! It's like some of you were just WAITING to find something new to go the fuck off about! Jesus! You have now officially called the mods, liars cheats and/or fucking idiots. Fine. You said your piece as is your right. Now, will you give it a rest - PLEASE!!! :mad:
 
the Snood:
I don't know how the logging is set up around here, nor who has console access to the actual machinery, but if what you say is "true" then the logs have been compromised. The drunken rant was deleted by removing the entire new-years thread - along with all the inoffensive well-wishes of others toward one another. Now they're back, but they were gone.

I understand the confusion. The thread was moved from the main forum to the hangout, since it was the type of thread that usually gets moved to the hangout now. Take that any way you wish, but it's not meant as something negative. You probably didn't the see the thread because it could have been near the bottom or wherever. But it is here on the hangout, with all the original posts. It was never deleted or hidden.

the Snood:
Mayhap they were "un-deleted," but the original deletion was nonetheless quite real.The thread was not deleted, as I explained.

the Snood:
All the jumping on Bijou in "hole with your hole" was deleted and then re-instated in a new thread of the same name and attributed to her, from which all elements the original thread had been expunged. That thread was moved from the "proper" area to the hangout, then back again.

Let me explain this one also. It's quite simple. I spoke with the original poster via PM and I moved his original thread (poetry only posts) back to the main forum, with the original thread title. I still had the other posts (non poetry) from that thread. So, they became their own thread, here in the hangout. All the original comments are there, starting with bijou's first, since she made the first comment. That's why her name is now on the thread. It just comes out that way. But the thread was not deleted. Just split -- after PMing the OP. So again, nothing sneaky or evil was done. I will swear to that and I really do hope you now understand.
 
Let me explain this one also. It's quite simple. I spoke with the original poster via PM and I moved his original thread (poetry only posts) back to the main forum, with the original thread title. I still had the other posts (non poetry) from that thread. So, they became their own thread, here in the hangout. All the original comments are there, starting with bijou's first, since she made the first comment. That's why her name is now on the thread. It just comes out that way. But the thread was not deleted. Just split -- after PMing the OP. So again, nothing sneaky or evil was done. I will swear to that and I really do hope you now understand.
Which is, of course, why this post (the first in the new thread):
I find myself curious as to why this got moved to the hangout.

It's not the best poem I've ever read, to be sure. But it's a poem, of sorts, and it got a critical response, and as such this thread is about poems, writing and critique. Nothing off-topic here at all.

Please, though. Don't explain. I'd rather just wonder. And I'll hope that if, in fact, the OP was interested in gaining critique for the piece, he or she can find it again now that the thread has been moved. I will assume the mods are at least kind enough to let people know via PM when their stuff gets transferred.

bj
Makes so much sense as an initial post. Just look at that first line. What the hell is she talking about?

No matter. She's left little dirty footprints on Our Sainted Thematic Threads and, so, must be moved.

The fact that this new thread, not created by the "original poster," but artificially by the moderator, makes no sense whatsoever (other than drifting Unapproved Thought from some other thread) isn't the problem. It Is Moved 'Cuz It Don't Fit.

Thank you, Gods. (Ahem.) Goddesses.

You are always, of course correct, and have only the best interests of the forum in mind. And we thank you for it.
 
WTF guys! What "I'm seeing around here of late" is a bunch of serious shit over nothing! It's like some of you were just WAITING to find something new to go the fuck off about! Jesus! You have now officially called the mods, liars cheats and/or fucking idiots. Fine. You said your piece as is your right. Now, will you give it a rest - PLEASE!!! :mad:
Read my previous post.
 
Which is, of course, why this post (the first in the new thread):Makes so much sense as an initial post. Just look at that first line. What the hell is she talking about?

No matter. She's left little dirty footprints on Our Sainted Thematic Threads and, so, must be moved.

The fact that this new thread, not created by the "original poster," but artificially by the moderator, makes no sense whatsoever (other than drifting Unapproved Thought from some other thread) isn't the problem. It Is Moved 'Cuz It Don't Fit.

Thank you, Gods. (Ahem.) Goddesses.

You are always, of course correct, and have only the best interests of the forum in mind. And we thank you for it.

Oh, you're being silly.
 
Which is, of course, why this post (the first in the new thread):Makes so much sense as an initial post. Just look at that first line. What the hell is she talking about?

No matter. She's left little dirty footprints on Our Sainted Thematic Threads and, so, must be moved.

The fact that this new thread, not created by the "original poster," but artificially by the moderator, makes no sense whatsoever (other than drifting Unapproved Thought from some other thread) isn't the problem. It Is Moved 'Cuz It Don't Fit.

Thank you, Gods. (Ahem.) Goddesses.

You are always, of course correct, and have only the best interests of the forum in mind. And we thank you for it
.

Like I said in my prior post, you are just looking to find something to be a snarky shit about. I'm not a mod, so I can tell you EXACTLY what I think about your sarcastic crap - it is petty and is absolutely NOTHING but bullshit.

You called the mods liars and you were proved wrong. Instead of saying, "Sorry, my mistake" you change directions and start spouting BS about threads not making sense. You are better than that dude, and I hope you think about what you've been saying and post an apology.
 
Like I said in my prior post, you are just looking to find something to be a snarky shit about. I'm not a mod, so I can tell you EXACTLY what I think about your sarcastic crap - it is petty and is absolutely NOTHING but bullshit.

You called the mods liars and you were proved wrong. Instead of saying, "Sorry, my mistake" you change directions and start spouting BS about threads not making sense. You are better than that dude, and I hope you think about what you've been saying and post an apology.
Of course you can tell me exactly what you think. Free speech area, right?

My comment about Eve's explanation was not meant to be sarcastic, but merely demonstrative. Eve obviously thinks I'm wrong (big surprise, there). You think worse. I merely quoted the first post in the thread that Eve created by moving BJ's post. I hope we can't argue about that (I mean, like, just go there and read it yourself). I found that starting post odd and misrepresentational of the context in which that post was initially made.

I mean, it could just be me, do you think BJ's post makes sense as the first post of a thread?

Just asking.
 
Of course you can tell me exactly what you think. Free speech area, right?

My comment about Eve's explanation was not meant to be sarcastic, but merely demonstrative. Eve obviously thinks I'm wrong (big surprise, there). You think worse. I merely quoted the first post in the thread that Eve created by moving BJ's post. I hope we can't argue about that (I mean, like, just go there and read it yourself). I found that starting post odd and misrepresentational of the context in which that post was initially made.

I mean, it could just be me, do you think BJ's post makes sense as the first post of a thread?

Just asking.

Horse shit Tzara! If you don't think "You are always, of course correct, and have only the best interests of the forum in mind. And we thank you for it." isn't snarky and sarcastic you need to rethink it again. You are just pissing and moaning about the most inconsequental shit imaginable. If this is the best you got to bitch about you need to SINCERELY say you are sorry and move the fuck on, dude.

Same goes for you too, Snood. You two are WAY better than this.
 
Of course you can tell me exactly what you think. Free speech area, right?

My comment about Eve's explanation was not meant to be sarcastic, but merely demonstrative. Eve obviously thinks I'm wrong (big surprise, there). You think worse. I merely quoted the first post in the thread that Eve created by moving BJ's post. I hope we can't argue about that (I mean, like, just go there and read it yourself). I found that starting post odd and misrepresentational of the context in which that post was initially made.

I mean, it could just be me, do you think BJ's post makes sense as the first post of a thread?

Just asking.
I understand what you are saying. I wish my reply to her could have been at the top of the group, then the thread would have shown that I started it. It's just how it works when the posts are being moved. The OP's poetry thread, with the same name, is back on the main forum. I was just trying to remove comments that weren't really about his poem and put them in a separate thread. I think her comment to me and my replies didn't belong on the OP's poetry thread. I did PM him and that's why I moved his thread. It's now a poetry thread, the way it started, before I moved it, which I PMed him about and explained my mistake. The other non-poetry comments are now a thread and I kept the title so it could be found/recognized.

It really wasn't meant to be anything bad at all. It was a simple mistake. I just don't know how many more times I can explain something that wasn't anything but an innocent, yes innocent, move. I just wanted the OP to have his original poetry thread back and I thought that was done. I never imagined this mess would come from it. If bijou wants her first post moved, then I will move it and my name will be at the top and her comments gone. It's a simple enough thing to do. Just ask. I won't touch it without her request. Just let me know and I hope that takes care of this one problem. Maybe not the rest but hopefully this one.
 
Horse shit Tzara! If you don't think "You are always, of course correct, and have only the best interests of the forum in mind. And we thank you for it." isn't snarky and sarcastic you need to rethink it again. You are just pissing and moaning about the most inconsequental shit imaginable. If this is the best you got to bitch about you need to SINCERELY say you are sorry and move the fuck on, dude.

Same goes for you too, Snood. You two are WAY better than this.
Thank you for your opinion. We all have different things we are concerned about. I am concerned about this. If you think I'm being an asshole about it, well, that's of course your opinion.

I will not ask you to be sorry about your opinion. Please don't ask me to be sorry about mine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top