Cocksuckers ... can a 'straight' man like sucking cock

[peterheer51]

For years there has been much debate here and elsewhere about 'straight' men sucking cock. There are several schools of thought, where the phrase "straight cocksucker" is an oxymoron.

For most of my life, I considered myself as a heterosexual with some kinks that included wife sharing (fantasy only). In the past several years I became what most consider a bi-curious individual. I was looking far too long at photos of cock and thinking ,"What if?"

A little over a year ago, I took the plunge and met a guy for mutual blow jobs. Strictly, by the book, a bi-sexual activity, since I still enjoy sex with my wife.

My questions are:

Can a straight man, like sucking cock?

Does it instantly make him bi-sexual, if he still enjoys women?

Does the proviso ' I am not interested in the man, just the cock', release him from any label of bi-sexual or gay?

How many 'straight cocksuckers' consider themselves as tops, and how many identify as bottoms, or versatile?

Just wondering how the straight guys, who love cock think. I reluctantly accept the bi-sexual label, if I must. I will say that I didn't quit sucking cock after my first foray, and will admit that I do crave cock as much as I do pussy now. I like for my man to man sessions to include both of us being satisfied. I identify as neither top nor bottom. I will get on my knees and suck my buddy as he holds my head and calls me a cocksucker, then I will stand over him and call him a cocksucker as he blows me.

Just wondering what everyone thinks.

That's me pretty much exactly.
I would class myself as a straight cocksucker or maybe an oral bi. I have no interest in anal, top or bottom.
I have no romantic interest in men so don't class myself as gay.
It's strictly the cock for me. It's a bonus if the owner of the cock is a friend.

 

[cubbyfire04]

*sigh*

I'm just tired of the debate. It really is meaningless. I yearn for a day where we all just accepted the "Mounds vs. Almond Joy" slogan... "Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don't."

To identify something, is to decide what something is, while simultaneously deciding other things aren't  that. If sexuality is a spectrum, then to confine one's sexual identity to a word is an impossible task. Not because sexual identities don't exist, but because there are literally an infinite number of them...

For the folks my sexuality might offend, purpose of giving it a name is only to allow them to cast judgement upon me for something that has literally zero impact on their life.

 

[Escierto]

*sigh*

I'm just tired of the debate. It really is meaningless. I yearn for a day where we all just accepted the "Mounds vs. Almond Joy" slogan... "Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don't."

To identify something, is to decide what something is, while simultaneously deciding other things aren't  that. If sexuality is a spectrum, then to confine one's sexual identity to a word is an impossible task. Not because sexual identities don't exist, but because there are literally an infinite number of them...

For the folks my sexuality might offend, purpose of giving it a name is only to allow them to cast judgement upon me for something that has literally zero impact on their life.

So true. I used to attach labels to myself when I feared what my desires meant. Over a decade I wasted.

 

[cubbyfire04]

So true. I used to attach labels to myself when I feared what my desires meant. Over a decade I wasted.

Look at it this way... You didn't waste anything. You still had to put in the work to figure it out within yourself. For many of us, that is no easy feat.

Actually, I would argue that the internal battle to conquer our awareness, understanding, and acceptance of our sexual selves is fierce and ongoing for every single human.

Those who  think they've got it all figured out have merely built a wall around that battleground. The more steadfast they are in their ideas of what sexuality  should be, the stronger those walls have been reinforced... And what a boring place it would be to live outside those walls.

It begs the question... Can a person actually know they're "100% straight" if they've never had a same-sex experience?

If you say, "I just know I am," ok... maybe. But you'd be wrong if you told me you possess the psychological self-awareness to truly know whether or not that position was taken because you believe with every fiber being it is in your DNA rather than a defense mechanism triggered by even an iota of pressure from normative social influence.

 

[klippert]

There is a catch to all this. One; people trapped by labels and two; 431 different popsexological / Pronoungical definitions of something that was once just sex.
Can a straight guy like sucking cock. Sure. BUT, I’m Sorry fellas. These messed up times You’ll have to chose or have label chosen for you. Can just luv pussy and the occasional cock. You have to have a team, flag, parade and your victims card

 

[Escierto]

Look at it this way... You didn't waste anything. You still had to put in the work to figure it out within yourself. For many of us, that is no easy feat.

Actually, I would argue that the internal battle to conquer our awareness, understanding, and acceptance of our sexual selves is fierce and ongoing for every single human.

Those who  think they've got it all figured out have merely built a wall around that battleground. The more steadfast they are in their ideas of what sexuality  should be, the stronger those walls have been reinforced... And what a boring place it would be to live outside those walls.

It begs the question... Can a person actually know they're "100% straight" if they've never had a same-sex experience?

If you say, "I just know I am," ok... maybe. But you'd be wrong if you told me you possess the psychological self-awareness to truly know whether or not that position was taken because you believe with every fiber being it is in your DNA rather than a defense mechanism triggered by even an iota of pressure from normative social influence.

You are right. I used to think that I was completely heterosexual and I suppose that I could still rationalize my experiences by saying that my partners were women etc. It doesn’t change the fact that I have been sucking dick and getting fucked. Does it really matter if the cock belongs to a transgender woman? Probably not.

 

[starfish71]

If you like to suck dick, you are not "straight" by any commonly understood definition of the term in this context... but as others have commented, what and to whom does it matter? Do you feel the need to declare your sexuality to others in day to day life? Other than navigating hookup sites, where no one believes you are "straight" if you are looking to suck, why do you need a label?

 

[cubbyfire04]

If you like to suck dick, you are not "straight" by any commonly understood definition of the term in this context... but as others have commented, what and to whom does it matter? Do you feel the need to declare your sexuality to others in day to day life? Other than navigating hookup sites, where no one believes you are "straight" if you are looking to suck, why do you need a label?

A new hookup site business idea? I'll call it "NLA" (no labels attached). Labels aren't allowed. Just check the box for the body parts you want to suck/be sucked or fuck/be fucked.

 

[bimwiguy1963]

For a split second. Once that cock is in your mouth you are no longer straight. At least that's how it worked for me.

 

[BuckyDuckman]

Where's the obligatory comment about The Kinsey Scale? For the uninitiated, research subjects were rated on a scale from 0 - 6. Zero meant exclusively heterosexual. Six meant exclusively homosexual. (There was also an "X" for the asexual/non-sexual.) Kinsey disliked the term bisexual. He didn't believe that a person's taste in sexual relations was dependent on which body parts you had or with which body parts you liked to play since both sexes could have fun with those within and outside their gender.

As far as what others want to call me because of my sexual choices? Fuck'em.

 

[fitandfresh]

By your definition, rape victims are bisexual if they're raped by two different sexes. Your definition is absurd.

I suggest you go read up on the actual definition of bisexual, not your personal definition of it. No one is obligated or need concern themselves with your definitions that contradict actual word definitions.

Love all of your " toys" ......sooooo jealous lol

 

[Lumpy2]

I consider myself to be straight for now . I am looking forward to the day I find a beautiful cock to suck and fill my mouth with cum . After that day I will consider myself bi .

 

[TastySuckToy]

I consider myself to be straight for now . I am looking forward to the day I find a beautiful cock to suck and fill my mouth with cum . After that day I will consider myself bi .

What strikes me as strange about this perspective is that it would imply a person has no sexual orientation until they engage in sexual acts.

 

[PleasePeesMe]

Bisexual is what you're attracted to, not what you do.

Who cares what you call it, as long as you enjoy it.

 

[TastySuckToy]

I guess I should be labeled bisexual, but I hate labels. I simply regard myself as a sexual man who likes to have sex with whomever I'm attracted to and who is willing to have me. Given that, I say screw the labels. Just be who are you and do what you want.

I quite agree there are those who are overly concerned with labels.

 

[TallOne]

Bisexual is what you're attracted to, not what you do.

Bisexuality is romantic attraction, sexual attraction, or sexual behavior toward both males and females, or to more than one gender.

 

[TastySuckToy]

Bisexuality is romantic attraction, sexual attraction, or sexual behavior toward both males and females, or to more than one gender.

You can be bisexual with zero sexual experience and sexual activity with both sexes doesn't automatically mean bisexuality, as proven in my earlier example.

 

[cubbyfire04]

Where's the obligatory comment about The Kinsey Scale? For the uninitiated, research subjects were rated on a scale from 0 - 6. Zero meant exclusively heterosexual. Six meant exclusively homosexual. (There was also an "X" for the asexual/non-sexual.) Kinsey disliked the term bisexual. He didn't believe that a person's taste in sexual relations was dependent on which body parts you had or with which body parts you liked to play since both sexes could have fun with those within and outside their gender.

As far as what others want to call me because of my sexual choices? Fuck'em.

I tend to shy away from him in discussions like this because it can be argued that he only collected epidemiological data from the hornballs who weren't too ashamed to talk about sex. There's also the ethical questions about his observations in the realm of pedophilia that are tough to get past.

Sure, his work was groundbreaking but inevitably, it also leads people to believe the point is "most people are bisexual." As you stated his dislike for the term  bisexual... In his work, he used the terms heterosexual and homosexual to describe whether the sexual acts/thoughts were performed with the opposite sex or same sex, respectively... Not to label the individual. Hence the title of his books Sexual Behavior (as opposed to Sexuality) in the Human Male/Female.

So yeah... Fuck 'em. Labels don't matter

 

[oneblueye]

The problem with any theorizing is that some people take the objective data and make it prescriptive. They will have pet theories that are then used to analyze and/or attempt to control other people's behavior. The fast is that, by and large, people are going to behave sexually the way they want to. If they are even aware of the academists' theories, they simply think, "Fuck them! I'm horny and want to have sex."

Yeah you know ...,
that last quote was my point of self-realization, its also why the only label I refer to is, sexual opportunist.

 

[jrt20]

I love women. Love looking at them and fucking them. Also like sucking the cock of “straight” masculine men like myself

 

[Retnuhkcoc2020]

I consider myself straight, i love women but there is something amazing about getting on my knees and sucking a guy off.

 

[pcarp]

I'm confused by this whole thread/question.
A man can identify as a woman and a woman can identify as a man, so why should there be any issue if a cocksucker identifies as straight?

 

[nostuff]

For years there has been much debate here and elsewhere about 'straight' men sucking cock. There are several schools of thought, where the phrase "straight cocksucker" is an oxymoron.

For most of my life, I considered myself as a heterosexual with some kinks that included wife sharing (fantasy only). In the past several years I became what most consider a bi-curious individual. I was looking far too long at photos of cock and thinking ,"What if?"

A little over a year ago, I took the plunge and met a guy for mutual blow jobs. Strictly, by the book, a bi-sexual activity, since I still enjoy sex with my wife.

My questions are:

Can a straight man, like sucking cock?

Does it instantly make him bi-sexual, if he still enjoys women?

Does the proviso ' I am not interested in the man, just the cock', release him from any label of bi-sexual or gay?

How many 'straight cocksuckers' consider themselves as tops, and how many identify as bottoms, or versatile?

Just wondering how the straight guys, who love cock think. I reluctantly accept the bi-sexual label, if I must. I will say that I didn't quit sucking cock after my first foray, and will admit that I do crave cock as much as I do pussy now. I like for my man to man sessions to include both of us being satisfied. I identify as neither top nor bottom. I will get on my knees and suck my buddy as he holds my head and calls me a cocksucker, then I will stand over him and call him a cocksucker as he blows me.

Just wondering what everyone thinks.

From my perspective, a man who wants to play with other men is either gay or bi.

I consider myself bi. Not that I shout it from the rooftop, but I want to both fuck women and be fucked by men. And by the way, I consider myself just as masculine as any other guy. I just happen to like sucking cock.

It wasn’t always so. I was raised to be straight, and my thoughts were always straight. I was straight right up to the moment when I realized I wanted a man. Even then, I tried to ignore it, but it didn’t work. I finally came to accept my desire for cock. I now know I’m bi.

From what you wrote, it seems to me that you’re going through that same process: Always identified as straight, realized one day that you wanted a man and now struggle with your new desires. If you don’t want to be labeled, that’s fine. Nobody’s going to force you. Take your time.

But in the end, label or no label, just be honest with yourself.

 

[jimmyturtleman]

From my perspective, a man who wants to play with other men is either gay or bi.

I consider myself bi. Not that I shout it from the rooftop, but I want to both fuck women and be fucked by men. And by the way, I consider myself just as masculine as any other guy. I just happen to like sucking cock.

It wasn’t always so. I was raised to be straight, and my thoughts were always straight. I was straight right up to the moment when I realized I wanted a man. Even then, I tried to ignore it, but it didn’t work. I finally came to accept my desire for cock. I now know I’m bi.

From what you wrote, it seems to me that you’re going through that same process: Always identified as straight, realized one day that you wanted a man and now struggle with your new desires. If you don’t want to be labeled, that’s fine. Nobody’s going to force you. Take your time.

But in the end, label or no label, just be honest with yourself.

It has been over 6 years since I started this thread and posed the question as to whether a "straight" man can like sucking cock. Since that time, I have sucked more that a few cocks, and I admit that I really, really like it.

Like you, I don't shout it from the rooftops, I consider myself just as masculine as any other guy, and I like sex with women and men. I accept all of this, as well as being considered bi.

 

[Hitchiker69]

For years there has been much debate here and elsewhere about 'straight' men sucking cock. There are several schools of thought, where the phrase "straight cocksucker" is an oxymoron.

For most of my life, I considered myself as a heterosexual with some kinks that included wife sharing (fantasy only). In the past several years I became what most consider a bi-curious individual. I was looking far too long at photos of cock and thinking ,"What if?"

A little over a year ago, I took the plunge and met a guy for mutual blow jobs. Strictly, by the book, a bi-sexual activity, since I still enjoy sex with my wife.

My questions are:

Can a straight man, like sucking cock?

Does it instantly make him bi-sexual, if he still enjoys women?

Does the proviso ' I am not interested in the man, just the cock', release him from any label of bi-sexual or gay?

How many 'straight cocksuckers' consider themselves as tops, and how many identify as bottoms, or versatile?

Just wondering how the straight guys, who love cock think. I reluctantly accept the bi-sexual label, if I must. I will say that I didn't quit sucking cock after my first foray, and will admit that I do crave cock as much as I do pussy now. I like for my man to man sessions to include both of us being satisfied. I identify as neither top nor bottom. I will get on my knees and suck my buddy as he holds my head and calls me a cocksucker, then I will stand over him and call him a cocksucker as he blows me.

Just wondering what everyone thinks.

Call me what ever you want. I just like sex with other attractive adults. I love sucking tits and cocks. I love fucking pussy and ass. I love getting a hard cock up my ass. Kissing is nice. I can enjoy 69 with almost anyone. I just love sexual intimacy and the satisfaction it brings.