Cross-Examining the Climate Change Cultists

[ll74]

 

[YDB95]

No, they're making the fuel she needs to operate it cost more than she can afford.

If by "they" you mean the oil and gas industry, you're all too right. For once.

The transition to "green energy" (whatever the hell that is) is going to be evolutionary. Cutting the current sources of energy BEFORE economically viable replacements are in place is beyond foolhardy, it's criminal.

Then it's a good thing no one is doing that, isn't it?

 

[Chernosoth]

I LOL’ed hard. Most people can’t afford to walk to work.
Do you ever know what you’re talking about?

That is a strange response. Expensive walking is new to me.

Most suburbanites don't have the endurance or the time to walk to work, because they live so far from work. That is part of why the suburbs will mostly depopulate, along with the expenses of heating and cooling large homes, lawn maintenance, and the extra miles of road maintenance, pumped water, and electricity lost as heat on wires. Abandoned suburbia may eventually become farmland.

 

[phrodeau]

If by "they" you mean the oil and gas industry, you're all too right. For once.


Then it's a good thing no one is doing that, isn't it?

“They” are everyone who opposed taxing carbon twenty years ago, since it would have raised the pump price and lowered demand, so the price wouldn’t have shot up so high this year.

 

[Kindfarmer]

Cross-Examining the Climate Change Cultists​

Kurt Schlichter
|
Posted: Jul 28, 2022 12:01 AM

If you want to watch the pinkos fret, simply state the indisputable truth that what they call “climate change” is a massive hoax. Their fallback is inevitably that “science” – which they purport to love except when it demonstrates that there are only men and women and that you can’t change the sex you are born as – has decreed that because we peons insist on not living in caves like primitive tribesmen (okay, non-binary tribespeople) the Earth is going to cook. And, of course, the only solution is to do a whole bunch of things that leftists always wanted to do anyway. There’s no time to think, no time to reflect, and certainly no time to argue. Why, who are you to question the scientists?


Well, I’m a lawyer. I question scientists for a living.

Now, I have no scientific training to speak of. I majored in communications and political science, so the only science I studied at UC San Diego had to do with the physics of foaming when I poured Coors into a glass, as well as the mechanics of human reproduction. Don’t expect me to discourse deeply on the heat retention coefficient of CO2 – I don’t even know if that is a thing, but it sure sounds sciency.

Instead, I hire scientists in most every case I try. Sometimes I hire several in different disciplines. The other side does too, and here’s the weird thing – at trial, the other side’s scientists always, always, disagree with my scientists.

CARTOONS | AF BRANCO
VIEW CARTOON
Weird, huh? Because I was told that in the context of climate change the science is settled, that there is only one possible answer and that anything else is at least quackery and possibly felony denial.

Much more here: https://townhall.com/columnists/kur...xamining-the-climate-change-cultists-n2610861

Environmentalists are dumb automatons. They sleepwalk from one séance to another. Don't forget to click on the cartoons for some truth.

Screaming “I’m a complete and total fool” on a public forum is a bad optic. Just sayin

 

[Rightguide]

Screaming “I’m a complete and total fool” on a public forum is a bad optic. Just sayin

Yes, so you should probably shut up and move on.