Vincent E
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2001
- Posts
- 785
Go crazy?kellycummings said:"All work and no beer makes Homer.....something....something..."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Go crazy?kellycummings said:"All work and no beer makes Homer.....something....something..."
Vincent E said:Go crazy?
TheEarl said:Books that were screwed as films: All the Bond books (The original Ian Fleming ones that is).
Sure I do like the Bond films, they're great, but James Bond will always be remembered as the fast screwing, glib playboy spy with gadgets galore. Rather than as the cold, cruel spy, who gets his emotions crushed in Casino Royale and shuts down his emotions thereafter. You Only Live Twice was a classic book with fantastic character creation of a shattered James getting over the death of his wife.
Despite the filmmakers trying to make Bond a harder character, they're never going to capture the books.
The Earl
gauchecritic said:So this piece of phlegm hit you on the shoulder, skidded across your jacket, hit you on the wrist, then did a 180 degree turn and hit you on the thigh. So much for the loan spitter. When you were hit in the face the spitball must have come from foreward and right, because it made you jerk your head back and to the left. Back. and to the left.
kellycummings said:"All work and no beer makes Homer.....something....something..."
perdita said:
However, Kurosawa, in another medium and language, set in medieval Japan, brought Macbeth to the screen in Throne of Blood. It is a brilliant adaptation of Shakespeare, and a brilliant film in itself.
Perdita
Sub Joe said:I think it would be more difficult to find a shitty book that made a great movie. I can't think of any, in fact.
I can't forget anything of Kurosawa. "Ran" is a version, yes; not really Lear the way Throne of Blood was Macbeth. I love "Ran", but it's not Shakespeare in the same way ToB is, for me.kellycummings said:Don't forget "Ran". It was a great version of King Lear.
Sub Joe said:I think it would be more difficult to find a shitty book that made a great movie. I can't think of any, in fact.
Tatelou said:Watership Down. Good book, GREAT film.
Always makes me cry, and the soundtrack adds to the brilliance of it. Seriously.
shereads said:The crying and soundtrack references made me remember the book/film partnership I can't believe I'd forgotten:
To Kill A Mockingbird.
Still missing Atticus Finch.
Hey, boo.
Sub Joe said:Have to say I laughed at the Seinfeld take on "The English Patient". Like Elaine in that episode, I found the original film unbearably boring.
SadieRose said:And the film was an oversimplified crock of shite.
SadieRose said:Everyone send Terry Gilliam five dollars so that he can make the movie of Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett's Good Omens, please. he only needs about £35,000 dollars now!
Tatelou said:Ah! I've thought of an exception to my very general and sweeping statement, made earlier in this thread...
Watership Down. Good book, GREAT film.
Remec said:Coolness! I love that book.
I'm still waiting for Gilliam to get back on track making Alan Moore's The Watchmen, however...but this will do for now, I suppose. (The way The Watchmen shifts from view, style, and tone, though, it might make for a better miniseries. They still make miniseries, don't they?)
cahab said:... Ditto for Plague Dogs.
And on bad adaptations, at the risk of repeating myself (okay, so definitely repeating myself, whatever), Hannibal.
My teeth were ground down to stumps coming out of that movie. No! No! No! And from Ridley Scott, too, who should know better.
kellycummings said:Please tell me you didn't like the end of Hannibal (the book). I was so into it until the end and then wanted to throw it down, find Thomas Harris and choke him. The movie wasn't great but at least it had a better ending. IMHO.