Hello im new :)

It's no surprise that those who enjoy hazing other posters think that such a blatant "let's you and me laugh at him/her" we/they game is just a lot of fun.

Anyhow, I suggest that new posters thinking of posing a question on this forum--either about procedure or the content of their work--read through this thread very carefully. Buyer beware.
 
It's no surprise that those who enjoy hazing other posters think that such a blatant "let's you and me laugh at him/her" we/they game is just a lot of fun.

Anyhow, I suggest that new posters thinking of posing a question on this forum--either about procedure or the content of their work--read through this thread very carefully. Buyer beware.

Are you serious? I think this is the best place to post question on procedure and content. Especially on content. You've admitted on several occassions that you support newbies and those requesting feedback by correcting "bum advice" and now you're telling those people not to post here? Seriously?

And, I don't think anybody here was laughing at Innocent. They were laughing at Jenny's parody. I don't know how many times that hard head of yours has to hear this in order for it to sink in. Nobody bashed anybody. Nobody was mean spirited or ugly to anybody. It was a joke about the numerous times people ask that same question put in a fun parody. Good grief.
 
Are you serious? I think this is the best place to post question on procedure and content. Especially on content. You've admitted on several occassions that you support newbies and those requesting feedback by correcting "bum advice" and now you're telling those people not to post here? Seriously?

And, I don't think anybody here was laughing at Innocent. They were laughing at Jenny's parody. I don't know how many times that hard head of yours has to hear this in order for it to sink in. Nobody bashed anybody. Nobody was mean spirited or ugly to anybody. It was a joke about the numerous times people ask that same question put in a fun parody. Good grief.

Part of supporting the newbies is suggesting that they be very careful about the advice being given them here, yes. Check it (and the one giving it, as possible) out.

And of course the "The Question" "joke" isn't innocent--it's "I'm/we're superior" hazing. As said up the line, it's uplifting to the cyber bully, not to the one being targeted.

good grief is right.

But no need to go around the mulberry pole on this again. Those who are doing it--and those endorsing it--know why it's being done.
 
Part of supporting the newbies is suggesting that they be very careful about the advice being given them here, yes. Check it (and the one giving it, as possible) out.

And of course the "The Question" "joke" isn't innocent--it's "I'm/we're superior" hazing. As said up the line, it's uplifting to the cyber bully, not to the one being targeted.

good grief is right.

But no need to go around the mulberry pole on this again. Those who are doing it--and those endorsing it--know why it's being done.


Good grief man, lighten up!

I don't think anyone, with the exception of you, took Jenny's tongue-in-cheek comments seriously. No one was bashing the Newb.
 
good grief is right.

But no need to go around the mulberry pole on this again. Those who are doing it--and those endorsing it--know why it's being done.

And you're just doing your civic duty by flogging this horse into a bloody sludge.:rolleyes:

'lil innocent hasn't been back. Has she served her purpose yet?
 
'lil innocent hasn't been back. Has she served her purpose yet?

No quite yet. :)

Incidentally, I'm not the one who brought it back up (flogged it). Elfin did--in post #71 above. If others keep bringing it back up, I don't mind repeating what I have to say about it.
 
Last edited:
No quite yet. :)

Incidentally, I'm not the one who brought it back up (flogged it). Elfin did--in post #71 above. If others keep bringing it back up, I don't mind repeating what I have to say about it.

Yup, thought so..

toodles
 
We think differently, then. That's life.

Yes it is. You seem to go around with a chip on your shoulder, and looking for problems where none exist.

As far as Jenny goes, I've never seen her bash a newb in this forum, she spends a lot of time reading, and giving thoughtful opinions to new writers.
 
Yes it is. You seem to go around with a chip on your shoulder, and looking for problems where none exist.

As far as Jenny goes, I've never seen her bash a newb in this forum, she spends a lot of time reading, and giving thoughtful opinions to new writers.

Care to participate in the shunning?
 
Care to participate in the shunning?

The board dynamics can't be made any clearer than that. :D

(Interesting that you didn't respond to my pointing out that I wasn't the one who brought the topic up again.)
 
Sr, you might as well give up. They're not going to see the point you're making, no matter how you phrase it.

The point is NOT whether Jenny meant to bash the newbie. Of course she didn't, we all know that. The Point is, the parody can easily be seen as a bash to a newcomer who hasn't been around here before.

I asked The Question when I first arrived. I got a similar response and felt quite put down by it. I sat back and watched the forums for some time after, before being game to step in again. And I have been around other forums and tend to have a "Fuck you, you're not running me off that easily" attitude.

Others aren't as pigheaded, some will be insulted and won't come back. I think it's sad to run off people all because of a "joke".
 
Sr, you might as well give up. They're not going to see the point you're making, no matter how you phrase it.

The point is NOT whether Jenny meant to bash the newbie. Of course she didn't, we all know that. The Point is, the parody can easily be seen as a bash to a newcomer who hasn't been around here before.

I asked The Question when I first arrived. I got a similar response and felt quite put down by it. I sat back and watched the forums for some time after, before being game to step in again. And I have been around other forums and tend to have a "Fuck you, you're not running me off that easily" attitude.

Others aren't as pigheaded, some will be insulted and won't come back. I think it's sad to run off people all because of a "joke".


Thanks, Starrkers--the thread has been dormant for five and a half hours, though, so of course I was letting it go--just like I let it go the first time until Elfin reintroduced it today (something the mob is conveniently blind to). If they want to discuss it again, though, I'm game. I don't mind the bad behavior being pointed to on the forums for general readers to see and to contemplate what can happen to them.
 
Last edited:
In case anybody is interested, LIA still has no stories posted.:( I hope she wasn't scared away by the silly wrangling, if she isn't just an alt. :D
 
Last edited:
In case anybody is interested, LIA still has no stories posted.:( I hope she wasn't cared away by the silly wrangling, if she isn't just an alt. :D

I for one am pretty sure she was just an alt, used for the purpose this thread was intended for. JJ made her famous or infamous (according to how you want to look at it) post and the rest is history.

Just my opinion of course.
 
Actually, I'm rather loving this. The alt got mashed as I expected. And SR came out of the closet with his moronic bullshit for everyone to see.

Can you say EXPOSED!?
 
I for one am pretty sure she was just an alt, used for the purpose this thread was intended for. JJ made her famous or infamous (according to how you want to look at it) post and the rest is history.

Just my opinion of course.

I have to say, even if she was or is a new author, there was nothing wrong with the post by JJ. :DIt was strictly joshing, certainly not an attack, and everybody could see that. It's fairly customary for the "new kid on the block" to go through a certain amount of good-natured hazing, and that's all this was, or would have been. :D
 
Back
Top