I Demand An Immediate Retraction And Apology

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenny_Jackson
For someone who claims to write with care, percision and lucidity, I'm confused. "...I'm going to heel you." What is that? Is she going to make the other person into a foot, maybe a shoe or is she following close behind?

This person needs to go back and read what she wrote. I'm glad I didn't write that mess.


I think "to heel" means to put a person underneath their heel, in a figurative manner at least.

In boxing, to heel another fighter means hitting him with the heel of the hand. That's against the rules.

ETA: I don't believe that's what she means. She probably means to grind under her heel, or something to that effect.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenny_Jackson
For someone who claims to write with care, percision and lucidity, I'm confused. "...I'm going to heel you." What is that? Is she going to make the other person into a foot, maybe a shoe or is she following close behind?

This person needs to go back and read what she wrote. I'm glad I didn't write that mess.




In boxing, to heel another fighter means hitting him with the heel of the hand. That's against the rules.

ETA: I don't believe that's what she means. She probably means to grind under her heel, or something to that effect.
Or maybe she meant to type a "K", two "L"s, and one "I"-- and just bollocked the word.
 
Pffft - I think you need to clean your gasmask, darlin'. Check my profile if you're confused. *grin*
There's nothing confusing about you. But you should never assume I'm actually serious and not just yanking your pigtails.

I'll bet you have pigtails. At least, in my fantasies, you do. :p
 
There's nothing confusing about you. But you should never assume I'm actually serious and not just yanking your pigtails.

I'll bet you have pigtails. At least, in my fantasies, you do. :p

*dingdingding*

Ususally three or so. Allows easier access to the nibbly spots.:D
 
TO HEEL SOMEONE IS TO MAKE THEM BEND TO ONE'S SERVITUDE.

You can call a dog to heel.

Sorry, I'm not yelling forgot my cap's was on.
 
A bit over the top, but I get it... I think. Just maybe put a note on the top stating that this is not intended for everyone to read? I actually read it, and was mildly amused by the defining of every word... Then the loooooooooong quotes started coming one after another. So a word of advice for what it's worth: Keep it more concise. A sleeping jury can't find in your favor.
 
The original post was sooooo hot! I almost....

Holy crap, why did you dig this back up, @JaySecrets? And why the hell am I perpetuating it? It's past my bedtime.
 
A bit over the top, but I get it... I think. Just maybe put a note on the top stating that this is not intended for everyone to read? I actually read it, and was mildly amused by the defining of every word... Then the loooooooooong quotes started coming one after another. So a word of advice for what it's worth: Keep it more concise. A sleeping jury can't find in your favor.
Mate, you've dug up a sixteen year old thread. Why have you resurrected it? That's what spammers do on this site, resurrect old posts then link to junk sites.
 
I thought this was satire, but no, this is the greatest thing I've read all week.

This random necromancy should become a thing. I forgot how wild the internet was back then. I picked a number at random "805" and scrolled back. Here's the highlights:


Suggestions for Pirate Arm-Tattoo(s)?
9/11 was an inside job.
Is including minors in a story child porn?
Who was Jesus anyway?
 
This random necromancy should become a thing.
I'd rather people resurrect "classic" stories that need more attention than they ever got. A 20+ year old story might be interesting. I mean, no smart phones, a lot of people still using landlines, no streaming video, no electric cars, no significant online shopping or Zoom calls, and it's not a period piece?

What was Lit's first ever posted story? Is it still available? And is it about PEZ dispensers?
 
There appears to be no way to find that, but I found the oldest available story tagged with "Exhibitionist", it's from 2000. A quarter century ago.

https://www.literotica.com/s/if-tattoos-could-talk-and-they-do

I kept expecting to see the word "tallywhacker".
Currently, all the oldest stories are listed from the year 2000 because the site didn't display publication date before then, and when they got large enough to migrate to a more sophisticated server, everything from the late 90s got a date based on when it was transferred (I think).
This is the earliest archived snapshot of the site I could find, from October of 1999. There are maybe a couple hundred stories on the site at the time. As a warning, they hadn't yet instituted some of their restrictions at that point, so you may encounter things that have since been banned, like bestiality and rape, should you choose to peruse.
 
Mate, you've dug up a sixteen year old thread. Why have you resurrected it?
For same reason this thread popped up when I looked for new posts. It may have been a glitch. Whatever. I was not looking for an old thread. In fact I tripped onto it. And because it was under new posts I didn't bother looking at the date. I didn't know that it was that old. Please stop jumping to conclusions.
 
You can get to more by clicking some of the author names, which link to a primitive version of a profile that lists stories. Hover over the link. If it shows an email address, no luck. If it shows a link, that's what you're looking for.

No way of determining what was the first story outside of Laurel pointing it out, because there's little to no metadata on stories prior to 2000.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top