SimonBrooke
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2005
- Posts
- 1,139
Nasha said:I'm intrigued by, and still mulling over, the way your unsympathetic narrator functioned in the story. His frustration brings an added emotional dimension to the story, beyond the tension inherent in borderline consensual encounters, and creates an atmosphere of voyeurism and a certain titillating frustration, because the reader is bound by his limitations and so we are constantly straining to see, hear, learn more.
Good! That's exactly what I was trying to get!
Nasha said:Jasmine's the tough one, for me, in that. I'd gathered that she's an open, sexual person from glimpses of her through the earlier part of the story, and that would explain her getting excited by, say, what would ordinarily be a shocking public display of clearly consensual sex. But for me, it doesn't explain her not showing any concern that John is threatening to rape Pat, at least early in the scene before it's more clear she's going along of her own free will.
Does Pat give consent? Do you feel that at any point in this scene Pat gives consent? Do you feel she consents to John taking her to bed afterwards? Clearly, by the time they go upstairs the following day for (implicitly) anal sex, she is consenting. But what I'm trying to do is make the action of my story mimic the action of the story Pat is failing to tell. I intended you to understand that she was raped - or at least, that the very least, John was deliberately walking that interesting and dangerous borderline between consenting and non-consenting sex.
In my mind, what is happening here is at least at first dominance against a submission which isn't explicitly or consciously either willing or unwilling. I think that rape is at least partly an ex post facto crime - you have been raped if, after sex, you feel you have been raped. If you don't feel you have been raped you haven't been raped. I think whether either partner actually says 'yes' or not may be legally significant but it isn't necessarily morally or emotionally significant.
John knows what he is doing; of that I have no doubt. John is a morally complex character capable of ruthlessness. And by the morning, Pat doesn't feel in the least raped. In my original longer draft of the story, Colin encounters them years later happily married to each other.
Nasha said:To be honest, I'd most like to get a critique of this, but it's the third chapter of a longer story (though I do think the chapter stands fairly well on its own), so I certainly don't mind if you'd prefer to have a look at the beginning.
I shall get onto it immediately; it may take me a few days, but I'll get it done.
And many thanks again!