Infibulation

Never said:
@}-}rebecca----:
"Definately the case in de Sade's fiction Pure."

Nevertheless, infibulations are a type of female genital mutilation used in the real world outside of BDSM contexts and it is symbolic of a fear and hatred of female sexuality. You can't borrow the practice and lose the symbolism.


I disagree...

If you accept that then how do you explain the acceptance of the BDSM comunity to be called "PERVERTS".

It used to be a derogetory term, but we claimed it as our own. I don't think infibulation in THIS context is about mutilation.

Incidentally Trinique_Fire, what you describe is a form of infibulation that is often employed between consenting BDSM couples. It is a gesture of love and respect between partner and yes, there is an element of "Staking a Claim" or "Marking Property". Many people find that extremely erotic.
 
Dragonteeth said:
I disagree...

If you accept that then how do you explain the acceptance of the BDSM comunity to be called "PERVERTS".

It used to be a derogetory term, but we claimed it as our own. I don't think infibulation in THIS context is about mutilation.

Incidentally Trinique_Fire, what you describe is a form of infibulation that is often employed between consenting BDSM couples. It is a gesture of love and respect between partner and yes, there is an element of "Staking a Claim" or "Marking Property". Many people find that extremely erotic.

I wish to stay out of the developing conversation here with one exception. My original point based on my rather extensive knowledge of de Sade from both a fictional aspect and reality in as much has been documented is to state only that the topic of infibulation remains a part of the fiction realm. How others in this Century wish to manipulate fiction as a form of philosophy to suit their own agenda is not an issue to me. Mainly because I can and do differentiate between fiction and reality. This is not a strong point for everyone. ( General comment )

I will concede your point however Dragonteeth that today's reality of infibulation the intent is removed from mutilation. Best keep in mind however that no matter how this is painted erotically or otherwise within a range of opinions from within the BDSM Community, that some people will only ever regard the practise as a form of mutilation remains a fact. More so when you step outside of the weary in BDSM that have seen it all and move into the mainstream.

See why I preferred to stop at my initial comment .
 
Last edited:
Dragonteeth said:
I disagree...

If you accept that then how do you explain the acceptance of the BDSM comunity to be called "PERVERTS".

It used to be a derogetory term, but we claimed it as our own. I don't think infibulation in THIS context is about mutilation.

Incidentally Trinique_Fire, what you describe is a form of infibulation that is often employed between consenting BDSM couples. It is a gesture of love and respect between partner and yes, there is an element of "Staking a Claim" or "Marking Property". Many people find that extremely erotic.

Thanks for the confirmation, DT. The idea has only recently become something of a turn-on to me.
 
Trinique_Fire said:
Thanks for the confirmation, DT. The idea has only recently become something of a turn-on to me.


Me too frankly, though needleplay and temporary piercing is part of my repertoir, I've never done this. Would be very interesting.

Volunteers please apply by PM.
 
Would the piercings in the back be another type of this? "Lacing" I think it is called? I have my hood pierced and have fantasized about the labia being pierced as well, to be laced up later (to have permanent rings there). We joke on occasion about putting a little lock in place there, but we do know a couple of subs who actually do have this. I've often wondered if they pee, does the lock rust? Just a thought :)
 
malcah_ms said:
Would the piercings in the back be another type of this? "Lacing" I think it is called? I have my hood pierced and have fantasized about the labia being pierced as well, to be laced up later (to have permanent rings there). We joke on occasion about putting a little lock in place there, but we do know a couple of subs who actually do have this. I've often wondered if they pee, does the lock rust? Just a thought :)


Well if the lock was positioned at the TOP of the lacing and was of sufficient quality (Brass) it shouldnt be a problem.

Sound's like a very erotic idea.
 
malcah_ms said:
Would the piercings in the back be another type of this? "Lacing" I think it is called? I have my hood pierced and have fantasized about the labia being pierced as well, to be laced up later (to have permanent rings there). We joke on occasion about putting a little lock in place there, but we do know a couple of subs who actually do have this. I've often wondered if they pee, does the lock rust? Just a thought :)
You are thinking of corset piercings, which can be done in the back, leg, arm, etc. They are not considered infibulation, no. :)

I have no idea about rusting! :eek:
 
Okay, I want to kind of clarify my views.

[tr][td]Infibulation[/td][td]
BDSM Practice​
[/td][td]
FGM Practice​
[/td][/tr][tr][td]Permanence[/td][td]
not permanent​
[/td][td]
permanent​
[/td][/tr][tr][td]Purpose[/td][td]
Erotic play​
[/td][td]
Reduction of sexual desire, often religion-based​
[/td][/tr][tr][td]How done[/td][td]
Sewing up the labia​
[/td][td]
May include sewing, clitoral removal, and more​
[/td][/tr][tr][td]Lasting effects[/td][td]
Virtually none, possible tiny scars​
[/td][td]
Damaged genitalia, mental trauma​
[/td][/tr]
 
Etoile said:
You are thinking of corset piercings, which can be done in the back, leg, arm, etc. They are not considered infibulation, no. :)

I have no idea about rusting! :eek:

Right! Thank you! I've seen piercings like that and thought wow, that looks neat.

Hee hee on the rusting. But one does have to wonder... hmmm :confused:
 
Dragonteeth said:
Well if the lock was positioned at the TOP of the lacing and was of sufficient quality (Brass) it shouldnt be a problem.

Sound's like a very erotic idea.

Yeah, I thought it sounded erotic too, especially since it would make the perpetual pot of swampiness a special place with ribbon and all :cool:
 
malcah_ms said:
Yeah, I thought it sounded erotic too, especially since it would make the perpetual pot of swampiness a special place with ribbon and all :cool:


Well if you do it please do post some pics.

It may be outside the Lit rules but if you do please PM me and I'll give you my email address. I'd be really interested to SEE but also to hear of your experiences.

LOL @ the "perpetual pot of swampiness" lovely way with words.

Would you be wanting to secure an object inside too?
 
Dragonteeth said:
Well if you do it please do post some pics.

It may be outside the Lit rules but if you do please PM me and I'll give you my email address. I'd be really interested to SEE but also to hear of your experiences.

LOL @ the "perpetual pot of swampiness" lovely way with words.

Would you be wanting to secure an object inside too?

Securing an object inside would be up to Master, but I'd certainly be game :cool: I still have to get my tat that is covering the rest of my back so not sure when I'll get the piercings. My piercer went AWOL so have to find a new one :(
 
malcah_ms said:
Securing an object inside would be up to Master, but I'd certainly be game :cool: I still have to get my tat that is covering the rest of my back so not sure when I'll get the piercings. My piercer went AWOL so have to find a new one :(


Of course it would...

A Master's word is Law.

Best of luck with the tat and the piercings.

Do tell him of my interest, ask him to drop me a line if he likes.
 
Sure thing, will do. You're born the same day as Master's other slave. How funny. :)


Okay now back to the topic at hand...when I read that part in Justine where she is sewn up, ripped open then sewn up again, it did make me shudder and wonder why anyone would want to permanently damage a woman there in her precious place...
 
malcah_ms said:
Sure thing, will do. You're born the same day as Master's other slave. How funny. :)


Okay now back to the topic at hand...when I read that part in Justine where she is sewn up, ripped open then sewn up again, it did make me shudder and wonder why anyone would want to permanently damage a woman there in her precious place...


Well there's a coincidence, what is it about scorpios huh?
 
Dragonteeth said:
I disagree...

If you accept that then how do you explain the acceptance of the BDSM comunity to be called "PERVERTS".

It used to be a derogetory term, but we claimed it as our own. I don't think infibulation in THIS context is about mutilation.

Incidentally Trinique_Fire, what you describe is a form of infibulation that is often employed between consenting BDSM couples. It is a gesture of love and respect between partner and yes, there is an element of "Staking a Claim" or "Marking Property". Many people find that extremely erotic.



micropore tape works well, as a symbolic substitute, with the added fun that its difficult to pull off :D
 
mickyp123 said:
micropore tape works well, as a symbolic substitute, with the added fun that its difficult to pull off :D


Thanks micky

I have a role of Duct tape here and now I'm having all kinds of impure thoughts about duct tape and female pubic hair!!!

I REALLY needed that today!!!
 
Dragonteeth said:
Thanks micky

I have a role of Duct tape here and now I'm having all kinds of impure thoughts about duct tape and female pubic hair!!!

I REALLY needed that today!!!

sorry she was "smooth" lol and now i am thinking of her so i think you have got me back lol
 
Smooth is da way to be. :) We opted for laser hair removal. Nice to not have ANY hair. :D
 
malcah_ms said:
Smooth is da way to be. :) We opted for laser hair removal. Nice to not have ANY hair. :D

Well I can see the attraction.

Personally I'd want to make it one of my girl's rituals.

Maybe have her trim it to a patern sometimes or something but that's not the topic under discussion.

I was lookin at the roll of duct tape and thinkin something similar to the "Infibrilation"
idea but,

Tape her shut

Seen pics of girls Gagged in that maner.

Just had a rather odd thought about a surgical stapler too...

Must stop thinking...

I think...
 
Etoile said:
Okay, I want to kind of clarify my views.

[tr][td]Infibulation[/td][td]
BDSM Practice​
[/td][td]
FGM Practice​
[/td][/tr][tr][td]Permanence[/td][td]
not permanent​
[/td][td]
permanent​
[/td][/tr][tr][td]Purpose[/td][td]
Erotic play​
[/td][td]
Reduction of sexual desire, often religion-based​
[/td][/tr][tr][td]How done[/td][td]
Sewing up the labia​
[/td][td]
May include sewing, clitoral removal, and more​
[/td][/tr][tr][td]Lasting effects[/td][td]
Virtually none, possible tiny scars​
[/td][td]
Damaged genitalia, mental trauma​
[/td][/tr]
Not sure why I haven't posted in this thread until now - I find the photos that you posted beautiful - liked the ties using one thread better aesthetically but can understand using multiple threads. I know a woman who has had multiple labia piercings that her M laces up with ribbon and it looks stunning (but does it fit the term infibulation?).
 
neonflux said:
Not sure why I haven't posted in this thread until now - I find the photos that you posted beautiful - liked the ties using one thread better aesthetically but can understand using multiple threads. I know a woman who has had multiple labia piercings that her M laces up with ribbon and it looks stunning (but does it fit the term infibulation?).
I'm not sure if that would be considered infibulation or not...I guess it depends partly on the intent and partly on the method. If the intent is to close off her labia so she's inaccessible, then it sounds like infibulation to me...and yet if it's not done tightly - just kind of loose - then I wouldn't call it infibulation.

How about you get them to take some pictures and we'll judge from that. :devil: :rose:
 
Etoile said:
I'm not sure if that would be considered infibulation or not...I guess it depends partly on the intent and partly on the method. If the intent is to close off her labia so she's inaccessible, then it sounds like infibulation to me...and yet if it's not done tightly - just kind of loose - then I wouldn't call it infibulation.

How about you get them to take some pictures and we'll judge from that. :devil: :rose:
He's Dom. However, she requested them... Pictures now? :devil: :D
 
Etoile said:
I'm not sure if that would be considered infibulation or not...I guess it depends partly on the intent and partly on the method. If the intent is to close off her labia so she's inaccessible, then it sounds like infibulation to me...and yet if it's not done tightly - just kind of loose - then I wouldn't call it infibulation.

How about you get them to take some pictures and we'll judge from that. :devil: :rose:


You would not BELIEVE the hassle I had finding this pic...

I know I'd seen it somewhere...

It was the discussion of using ribon in multiple piercings that reminded me of it.

http://uk.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/maisy_mooe/detail?.dir=5be6&.dnm=785d.jpg&.src=ph

I think it's really beautifull.
 
Dragonteeth said:
You would not BELIEVE the hassle I had finding this pic...

I know I'd seen it somewhere...

It was the discussion of using ribon in multiple piercings that reminded me of it.

http://uk.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/maisy_mooe/detail?.dir=5be6&.dnm=785d.jpg&.src=ph
I think it's really beautifull.

Very nice! It appeals to me in a different way than the sewing...my brain isn't quite sure what to make of it! But I think I see a female guiche peeking out at the bottom, maybe...?
 
Back
Top