Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tristesse said:I'd forgotten the judges are supposed to understand the rules too.
*swallows the whole flask in one gulp.*
Lauren Hynde said:Very well done. You haven't disappointed me*.
It's up to the three judges now. Please PM me your rulings within the next 24 hours.
* except Liar, who completely misunderstood the NO RHYMING clause. lol
Whaaat? But u zed...Lauren Hynde said:Very well done. You haven't disappointed me*.
It's up to the three judges now. Please PM me your rulings within the next 24 hours.
* except Liar, who completely misunderstood the NO RHYMING clause. lol
"The only limitation is you cannot use any pre-defined rhyme scheme whatsoever, other than eye rhymes (i.e. words that are written in a similar way but that are pronounced differently and, hence, do not make an auditory rhyme, like slaughter and laughter)"Liar said:Whaaat? But u zed...
Huh. I read that all the wrong ways then.Lauren Hynde said:"The only limitation is you cannot use any pre-defined rhyme scheme whatsoever, other than eye rhymes (i.e. words that are written in a similar way but that are pronounced differently and, hence, do not make an auditory rhyme, like slaughter and laughter)"
In Perks' first poem, for example:
- cough / though / through
Lauren Hynde said:"The only limitation is you cannot use any pre-defined rhyme scheme whatsoever, other than eye rhymes (i.e. words that are written in a similar way but that are pronounced differently and, hence, do not make an auditory rhyme, like slaughter and laughter)"
In Perks' first poem, for example:
- cough / though / through
Tristesse said:*stubs out another pencil* Damn weak moments! Pass the bottle Eummie.......
Eummie?
Uh-oh.
Eumenides said:I went to the store. *hands Tess a fifth* There ya go, sweetie.
Tristesse said:Thanks sugah. I needed that. Sorry you're not feeling so good - this can't be helping any
How's it coming? I'm having to waffle.
Liar said:Good job judges. Insightful analysis and very good motivations for your rulings. I agree completely with the honorable three. Misreading the rules as well as the definition of the core point of one of them no challenge victory makes. 's even a lil embarrassing you gave it such effort to explain yourself.
Besides, perks poems, especially the first one, rocked my socks.
#L
See? I'm already a winner.Honey123 said:Come here, Liar....you can rest your head on my shoulder and I'll think of something to make you feel better!
perks said:
To the judges...
the eye-rhymes in my first poem are:
cough/through, through/though, laughter/slaughter, paid/said.
in the second:
grown/frown, four/sour, moot/foot, though/through.
as for the jealousy in the second poem, I agree it was subtle, and it wasn't the little girl towards me, it was me towards the little girl, when I said...
"no blond haired girl
wants to be
a thick brunette in high school"
I should have pumped that up a bit for clarity, I'm always saying, if you have to explain it, then you didn't write it well enough. I'd have to agree with that.
And next time, I'll be in for judging.
PS. Lauren, special thanks to you, I'd never even heard of eye-rhymes before, I'm such a spoken word kind of girl. Thanks for the new "skill" to learn.