masturbation etiquette while dating?

I think that in this matter, as in all social matters, a man should allow the woman to go first.
 
bobsgirl said:
I'm thinking this is just convoluted and illogical enough that some Bible-thumper somewhere would agree. THOSE are the ones whoshould masturbate and avoid reproducing.

that's sort of the origin of the idea... but some people actually DO consider many different things to be "sex"... anything from masturbation to actual PIV (which i've heard can be very fun).
 
midwestyankee said:
I think that in this matter, as in all social matters, a man should allow the woman to go first.

don't you mean COME first?
 
and does it matter what the guy thinks about while masturbating? if he fantasizes about someone else, that could be wrong. but in a long term relationship, how could a guy always think about the same girl each time?
 
Hanon435 said:
and does it matter what the guy thinks about while masturbating? if he fantasizes about someone else, that could be wrong. but in a long term relationship, how could a guy always think about the same girl each time?
Frankly, I don't worry about what my hubby thinks about when he's getting off, either during sex or via masturbation. I don't see myself as the master of his conscience, and I'd hope that he feels the same way about me. :)
 
Hanon435 said:
and does it matter what the guy thinks about while masturbating? if he fantasizes about someone else, that could be wrong. but in a long term relationship, how could a guy always think about the same girl each time?

Your thoughts/fantasies are yours while you masturbate or having sex. You can't change them anyway, well, not really. Everyone has fantasies. It is natural. Most of them, IMHO, should be kept to yourself. If M has a fantasy about me I would wish for him to tell me (that would turn me on). If it was about someone else I would want him to keep it to himself. I'm not saying he should not have those fantasies; I just don't need to hear about them.
 
midwestyankee said:
Next you'll want to know who came first, the chicken or the egg, right? ;)

i actually know the answer to this age-old question... this isn't really the place for it but i'll lay some philosophy down on ya here since you brought it up...

there are two ways to look at this. based on the phrasing you used, the egg came first because it doesn't specify CHICKEN egg. the egg was around long before chickens were... but this is splitting a semantic hair.

did the chicken come first or did the chicken EGG come first? easy. the chicken came first. it's not a chicken EGG unless it's layed by a chicken and it hatches a chicken. the chicken evolved from some other type of yardbird (as evolution dictates must have happened) so the very first chicken hatched from an egg that squirted out of that other animal. that, then, was the first chicken and some time later gave us the first chicken egg which then yielded the next generation of chicken.

ta-da. :)
 
Eilan said:
Frankly, I don't worry about what my hubby thinks about when he's getting off, either during sex or via masturbation. I don't see myself as the master of his conscience, and I'd hope that he feels the same way about me. :)

just try to keep him from thinking of ME, would ya. ;)
 
EJFan said:
i actually know the answer to this age-old question... this isn't really the place for it but i'll lay some philosophy down on ya here since you brought it up...

there are two ways to look at this. based on the phrasing you used, the egg came first because it doesn't specify CHICKEN egg. the egg was around long before chickens were... but this is splitting a semantic hair.

did the chicken come first or did the chicken EGG come first? easy. the chicken came first. it's not a chicken EGG unless it's layed by a chicken and it hatches a chicken. the chicken evolved from some other type of yardbird (as evolution dictates must have happened) so the very first chicken hatched from an egg that squirted out of that other animal. that, then, was the first chicken and some time later gave us the first chicken egg which then yielded the next generation of chicken.

ta-da. :)

So, do chickens have orgasms when they lay eggs?
 
bobsgirl said:
So, do chickens have orgasms when they lay eggs?
Shit! This reminds me of an off-the-board conversation that EJ and I were having last night.

Sorry. Carry on.
 
i don't think i speak solely for myself when i observe that i'm glad not to know the context of that, eilan.

ed
 
silverwhisper said:
i don't think i speak solely for myself when i observe that i'm glad not to know the context of that, eilan.

ed
It had more to do with chickens than with orgasms. But still. . . :p
 
Eilan said:
Shit! This reminds me of an off-the-board conversation that EJ and I were having last night.

Sorry. Carry on.

LMAO! that hadn't even popped into my little mind.
 
[slowly backs away from both of 'em, careful not to make any sudden movements]
 
bobsgirl said:
So, do chickens have orgasms when they lay eggs?

of course not, silly. ;)

allow me to clarify an additional piece of poultry knowledge... chickens only have orgasms during sex (unless their cock du jour is selfish and/or unskilled in such matters), not just from laying an egg. imagine if women had an orgasm every time they expelled an egg... talk about your middle of the day surprise! :eek:
 
silverwhisper said:
i don't think i speak solely for myself when i observe that i'm glad not to know the context of that, eilan.

ed

Having just learned the context, allow me to say, EWWWW.

And...it explains a lot about why the Middle East is the way it is.
 
EJFan said:
i actually know the answer to this age-old question... this isn't really the place for it but i'll lay some philosophy down on ya here since you brought it up...

there are two ways to look at this. based on the phrasing you used, the egg came first because it doesn't specify CHICKEN egg. the egg was around long before chickens were... but this is splitting a semantic hair.

did the chicken come first or did the chicken EGG come first? easy. the chicken came first. it's not a chicken EGG unless it's layed by a chicken and it hatches a chicken. the chicken evolved from some other type of yardbird (as evolution dictates must have happened) so the very first chicken hatched from an egg that squirted out of that other animal. that, then, was the first chicken and some time later gave us the first chicken egg which then yielded the next generation of chicken.

ta-da. :)
But if a goose was artificially inseminated by a chicken and the animal that hatched out of the egg laid by the goose was a chicken, by your logic it would not be a chicken but a goose (quote: "it's not a chicken EGG unless it's layed by a chicken and it hatches a chicken").

So the real question now is would the goose have had an orgasm while being artificially inseminated?

I'm getting goose pimples just thinking about it. ;)
 
midwestyankee said:
But if a goose was artificially inseminated by a chicken and the animal that hatched out of the egg laid by the goose was a chicken, by your logic it would not be a chicken but a goose (quote: "it's not a chicken EGG unless it's layed by a chicken and it hatches a chicken").

So the real question now is would the goose have had an orgasm while being artificially inseminated?

I'm getting goose pimples just thinking about it. ;)

well... if a goose and a chicken bred, the product wouldn't be a chicken. however... if the chicken goosed a duck then we have a whole new issue with which to contend.

the big problem here is that chicken is both a noun and an adjective... goose is both a noun and a verb, as is duck. the whole thing is really becoming very unclear. i have two very good friends who have master's degrees in biology and english. perhaps the four of us could get together and hash this out (hash also being both a noun and a verb, thus further confusing the issue).
 
EJFan said:
well... if a goose and a chicken bred, the product wouldn't be a chicken. however... if the chicken goosed a duck then we have a whole new issue with which to contend.

the big problem here is that chicken is both a noun and an adjective... goose is both a noun and a verb, as is duck. the whole thing is really becoming very unclear. i have two very good friends who have master's degrees in biology and english. perhaps the four of us could get together and hash this out (hash also being both a noun and a verb, thus further confusing the issue).
I agree, though I'm somewhat chicken when it comes to philological discussions because it has been so long since I was in grad school.

Further, as I follow a mostly vegetarian diet, I would not be able to enjoy any of the hash that you propose as a menu item. For obvious reasons, I would not consume any paté. On the other hand, you can count on me to do no goosing of fellow conversants.

One last question: do we plan to use Fowler's Rules of Grammar during our discussion?
 
Just a thought on the original topic "masturbation etiquette while dating?"
I personally would be inclined to wait until after the dessert, but before the coffee.
Oh and don't forget to use a napkin. :)
 
midwestyankee said:
One last question: do we plan to use Fowler's Rules of Grammar during our discussion?

any chance that you and quoll were separated at birth? :p
 
quoll said:
Just a thought on the original topic "masturbation etiquette while dating?"
I personally would be inclined to wait until after the dessert, but before the coffee.
Oh and don't forget to use a napkin. :)
Question: is it polite to smoke during masturbation?
 
Back
Top