midwestyankee
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2003
- Posts
- 32,074
I think that in this matter, as in all social matters, a man should allow the woman to go first.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
bobsgirl said:I'm thinking this is just convoluted and illogical enough that some Bible-thumper somewhere would agree. THOSE are the ones whoshould masturbate and avoid reproducing.
midwestyankee said:I think that in this matter, as in all social matters, a man should allow the woman to go first.
Next you'll want to know who came first, the chicken or the egg, right?EJFan said:don't you mean COME first?
Frankly, I don't worry about what my hubby thinks about when he's getting off, either during sex or via masturbation. I don't see myself as the master of his conscience, and I'd hope that he feels the same way about me.Hanon435 said:and does it matter what the guy thinks about while masturbating? if he fantasizes about someone else, that could be wrong. but in a long term relationship, how could a guy always think about the same girl each time?
Hanon435 said:and does it matter what the guy thinks about while masturbating? if he fantasizes about someone else, that could be wrong. but in a long term relationship, how could a guy always think about the same girl each time?
midwestyankee said:Next you'll want to know who came first, the chicken or the egg, right?![]()
Eilan said:Frankly, I don't worry about what my hubby thinks about when he's getting off, either during sex or via masturbation. I don't see myself as the master of his conscience, and I'd hope that he feels the same way about me.![]()
EJFan said:i actually know the answer to this age-old question... this isn't really the place for it but i'll lay some philosophy down on ya here since you brought it up...
there are two ways to look at this. based on the phrasing you used, the egg came first because it doesn't specify CHICKEN egg. the egg was around long before chickens were... but this is splitting a semantic hair.
did the chicken come first or did the chicken EGG come first? easy. the chicken came first. it's not a chicken EGG unless it's layed by a chicken and it hatches a chicken. the chicken evolved from some other type of yardbird (as evolution dictates must have happened) so the very first chicken hatched from an egg that squirted out of that other animal. that, then, was the first chicken and some time later gave us the first chicken egg which then yielded the next generation of chicken.
ta-da.![]()
Shit! This reminds me of an off-the-board conversation that EJ and I were having last night.bobsgirl said:So, do chickens have orgasms when they lay eggs?
It had more to do with chickens than with orgasms. But still. . .silverwhisper said:i don't think i speak solely for myself when i observe that i'm glad not to know the context of that, eilan.
ed
Eilan said:Shit! This reminds me of an off-the-board conversation that EJ and I were having last night.
Sorry. Carry on.
bobsgirl said:So, do chickens have orgasms when they lay eggs?
silverwhisper said:i don't think i speak solely for myself when i observe that i'm glad not to know the context of that, eilan.
ed
bobsgirl said:Having just learned the context, allow me to say, EWWWW.
But if a goose was artificially inseminated by a chicken and the animal that hatched out of the egg laid by the goose was a chicken, by your logic it would not be a chicken but a goose (quote: "it's not a chicken EGG unless it's layed by a chicken and it hatches a chicken").EJFan said:i actually know the answer to this age-old question... this isn't really the place for it but i'll lay some philosophy down on ya here since you brought it up...
there are two ways to look at this. based on the phrasing you used, the egg came first because it doesn't specify CHICKEN egg. the egg was around long before chickens were... but this is splitting a semantic hair.
did the chicken come first or did the chicken EGG come first? easy. the chicken came first. it's not a chicken EGG unless it's layed by a chicken and it hatches a chicken. the chicken evolved from some other type of yardbird (as evolution dictates must have happened) so the very first chicken hatched from an egg that squirted out of that other animal. that, then, was the first chicken and some time later gave us the first chicken egg which then yielded the next generation of chicken.
ta-da.![]()
midwestyankee said:But if a goose was artificially inseminated by a chicken and the animal that hatched out of the egg laid by the goose was a chicken, by your logic it would not be a chicken but a goose (quote: "it's not a chicken EGG unless it's layed by a chicken and it hatches a chicken").
So the real question now is would the goose have had an orgasm while being artificially inseminated?
I'm getting goose pimples just thinking about it.![]()
I agree, though I'm somewhat chicken when it comes to philological discussions because it has been so long since I was in grad school.EJFan said:well... if a goose and a chicken bred, the product wouldn't be a chicken. however... if the chicken goosed a duck then we have a whole new issue with which to contend.
the big problem here is that chicken is both a noun and an adjective... goose is both a noun and a verb, as is duck. the whole thing is really becoming very unclear. i have two very good friends who have master's degrees in biology and english. perhaps the four of us could get together and hash this out (hash also being both a noun and a verb, thus further confusing the issue).
midwestyankee said:One last question: do we plan to use Fowler's Rules of Grammar during our discussion?
Question: is it polite to smoke during masturbation?quoll said:Just a thought on the original topic "masturbation etiquette while dating?"
I personally would be inclined to wait until after the dessert, but before the coffee.
Oh and don't forget to use a napkin.![]()