More face; less pussy and cock.

[Mr_BrownEyez]

Agreed. I took full body pictures for my thread. Even at the risk of my anonominity. Sadly though I've not gotten many replies...crap.

 

[Ekserb]

why would i spend a hot minute researching anything? who fucking cares, that's the point you mental midget.

yes, i'm gay, fat and bald yet still a better person than you.

That statement just doesn't jibe with the part where you asked me about the skimmer photos and commented on my future plans. Apparently you did care enough to do some research—and it certainly took longer than a "hot minute"—but it was all about me.

I'm flattered, really, but gay, fat and bald just isn't my type. Thanks, though!

For the record, I suggest you tell us all a little about yourself so that others may be the judge of whether you are better than me. Making that pronouncement without third-party verification seems a little premature, don't you think? Or are we supposed to use only the most recent "gay, fat and bald" proclamation as proof? Because that seems to be a pretty weak assertion. Based on that phrase alone I would say most people would disagree with your stated superiority, for I am neither gay, fat nor bald. [Not that there's anything wrong with being gay. As far as I'm concerned, you can suck all the dick you want.]

 

[AutoDelux]

That statement just doesn't jibe with the part where you asked me about the skimmer photos and commented on my future plans. Apparently you did care enough to do some research—and it certainly took longer than a "hot minute"—but it was all about me.

I'm flattered, really, but gay, fat and bald just isn't my type. Thanks, though!

For the record, I suggest you tell us all a little about yourself so that others may be the judge of whether you are better than me. Making that pronouncement without third-party verification seems a little premature, don't you think? Or are we supposed to use only the most recent "gay, fat and bald" proclamation as proof? Because that seems to be a pretty weak assertion. Based on that phrase alone I would say most people would disagree with your stated superiority, for I am neither gay, fat nor bald. [Not that there's anything wrong with being gay. As far as I'm concerned, you can suck all the dick you want.]

i clicked on your site and saw the photos. that's as much research i cared to perform on a failed shutterbug. quit taking your old, wrinkly penis so seriously.

 

[Ekserb]

i clicked on your site and saw the photos. that's as much research i cared to perform on a failed shutterbug. quit taking your old, wrinkly penis so seriously.

I'm perplexed. Why do you continue to deny your sexuality? You say that was the extent of your research, yet you know all about my travel plans and now you even seem familiar with the texture of my penis.

Come on, man! Be gay and proud! No one here will judge you. Okay, some might, but certainly not I. There is no hate in my heart, I assure you.

 

[giventake65]

I agree with Vixxennn, and not just because her photo is hot. (Which it is.)
Sometimes I like the mouth-watering closeup shots; sometimes I see them and think, "God, I wouldn't want to lick/fuck THAT!"
I often like the sexy poses, nude or semi-nude; other times, I want to see her breasts or pussy specifically.
If some people come here for one thing or another, fine. Don't like what you see, move on to the next one. Me? I come here one minute for one thing, but the next minute I want the other.
To each his or her own.

 

[AutoDelux]

I'm perplexed. Why do you continue to deny your sexuality? You say that was the extent of your research, yet you know all about my travel plans and now you even seem familiar with the texture of my penis.

Come on, man! Be gay and proud! No one here will judge you. Okay, some might, but certainly not I. There is no hate in my heart, I assure you.

i posted a pussy photo in your thread and you reported it. you think -i'm- the gay one here? lmao.

 

[gunforhire]

 

[AllenWmsUSA]

Close up shots of disembodied genitalia are, in fact, not worth the trouble. Occasionally, an artistic shot will run counter to that and be very erotic. But in general, nothing sexy about the "close up."

However, can't fault anyone for not showing their face. Sure, it makes a hotter photo. But everyone is entitled to the privacy and discretion level they're comfortable with. A lot of feces would hit the fan for a lot of people who are on Lit on the sly, if they were found out. And plastering your face on your profile is a sure fire way to get found out.

IMO, a good rule of thumb would be to keep the nasty close ups off the avatar that shows up with every post. If I look at your profile and see a big hairy cock pic, shame on me. But at least make it so I have to "opt in" to be subjected to that.

 

[Ekserb]

i posted a pussy photo in your thread and you reported it. you think -i'm- the gay one here? lmao.

You seem to have difficulty keeping up with the facts. Let me help you with a couple things.

You broke the forum rules and I reported it.

I didn't say you were gay, I merely suggested it to explain your fascination with young men in swim shorts. You plainly stated your homosexuality in this post:

yes, i'm gay, fat and bald yet still a better person than you.

Maybe you're just really frustrated at your lack of ability to attract men. You know, what with that fat and bald thing going against you. I don't know what part of the country you're in (maybe you'd have better luck meeting the man of your dreams if you shared your general location?) but I think I've read that interstate truck stops are a frequent hangout for promiscuous gay men. Give it a try!

 

[Thom_the_gleeman]

Close up shots of disembodied genitalia are, in fact, not worth the trouble. Occasionally, an artistic shot will run counter to that and be very erotic. But in general, nothing sexy about the "close up."

However, can't fault anyone for not showing their face. Sure, it makes a hotter photo. But everyone is entitled to the privacy and discretion level they're comfortable with. A lot of feces would hit the fan for a lot of people who are on Lit on the sly, if they were found out. And plastering your face on your profile is a sure fire way to get found out.

IMO, a good rule of thumb would be to keep the nasty close ups off the avatar that shows up with every post. If I look at your profile and see a big hairy cock pic, shame on me. But at least make it so I have to "opt in" to be subjected to that.

You are right, it is hard to find a compromis between a hot artistic picture and being found out by the wrong people. Personely I find it a shame when the face of a posing person is croped out, but when it is hidden, I find the picture more erotic then when the face is planely shown.

Thom

 

[AutoDelux]

You seem to have difficulty keeping up with the facts. Let me help you with a couple things.

You broke the forum rules and I reported it.

I didn't say you were gay, I merely suggested it to explain your fascination with young men in swim shorts. You plainly stated your homosexuality in this post:


Maybe you're just really frustrated at your lack of ability to attract men. You know, what with that fat and bald thing going against you. I don't know what part of the country you're in (maybe you'd have better luck meeting the man of your dreams if you shared your general location?) but I think I've read that interstate truck stops are a frequent hangout for promiscuous gay men. Give it a try!

you're projecting. -you- are the one trawling beaches and taking photographs of young men in swim shorts and then posting them on your site.

 

[AllenWmsUSA]

Did you two ever consider the possibility you're both just assholes? I'm not saying you are, but somebody needed to put that option out on the table. Carry on.

 

[neci]

more pussy! more cock!

if i want face, i'll go to the mall.



so, what's the point of this thread? lit's already cracked down on the pussy and the cock.

 

[AutoDelux]

Did you two ever consider the possibility you're both just assholes? I'm not saying you are, but somebody needed to put that option out on the table. Carry on.

did you ever consider that no one gives a fuck about what you consider?

 

[rekane]

more pussy! more cock!

if i want face, i'll go to the mall.



so, what's the point of this thread? lit's already cracked down on the pussy and the cock.

hmmm...
the point of this thread appears to be a bitch slapping contest.
that's just how it reads to me, a pair of disembodied boobs.

 

[neci]

hmmm...
the point of this thread appears to be a bitch slapping contest.
that's just how it reads to me, a pair of disembodied boobs.

it won't be long before they want to rid lit of the disembodied boobs as well.

Stop the Genitalia Gestapo!

 

[Ekserb]

you're projecting. -you- are the one trawling beaches and taking photographs of young men in swim shorts and then posting them on your site.

So, out of 53 photos in my People gallery, you see only the three of guys? You didn't even see the photos of couples that included a female. Interesting. Perhaps even the idea of a man with a woman was so disgusting that you were blind to those images.

Look at this photo and tell me what you see:

Do you see only a guy on a skimboard? You can't see the texture of the water or the power of the wave, frozen in time? The grace of the rider balanced on the board? None of that? Again, interesting.

I guess I could take more pictures of men to make the site more appealing to you, but the fact is that most models are women and most skimmers are men. That probably explains the preponderance of women in the gallery. I apologize, but you're not my target audience.

Since I hate to see people so frustrated, and since you've already established your aversion to research, I Googled "gay photographer" and found a great site for you. Here's a link to Glen Mitchell's site: For AutoDelux. Enjoy! (Google doesn't seem to agree with your assessment of my site, as it was nowhere to be found in the aforementioned search results.)

 

[Ekserb]

did you ever consider that no one gives a fuck about what you consider?

So angry! For someone who doesn't give a fuck about what anyone thinks, you sure seem enraged by what people think. My goodness!

 

[AllenWmsUSA]

hmmm...
the point of this thread appears to be a bitch slapping contest.
that's just how it reads to me, a pair of disembodied boobs.

Boobs are different...and yours are workin'.

 

[AutoDelux]

you don't have a 'target audience.' that's why you are a failed shutterbug. and what i notice first when looking at all of your photos is your stupid ass signature, like anyone would care to rip off a hack like you.

you really seem to be stuck on this gay theme. is it because women only get as close to you for taking your money to photograph them?

 

[Ekserb]

you don't have a 'target audience.' that's why you are a failed shutterbug. and what i notice first when looking at all of your photos is your stupid ass signature, like anyone would care to rip off a hack like you.

you really seem to be stuck on this gay theme. is it because women only get as close to you for taking your money to photograph them?

Whoa, wait a second! Now you've looked at all my photos? What happened to not wasting a "hot minute" on research? Your fascination with me gets deeper and deeper.

Dude, I'm just trying to help you. You said you're gay, and you seem to be very angry. Trust me on this one thing: Get laid and you'll feel so much better.

PM me with your city and I'll do the research (again!) in craigslist personals for a nice young man. While I'm willing to do this much, I refuse to use my mobile minutes to call him for you, so I'll give you his contact info when I find a suitably horny guy and the rest is up to you. Will you do this for me? Will you do this for yourself? If not, there is little else that can be done to relieve your obvious frustration. Remember, the journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.

 

[AutoDelux]

there's these things on your weak-ass-made-by-a-free-program site called 'thumbnails.' thumbnails are little preview photos of the larger photos you see when clicking on the 'thumbnails.'

again, -your- fascination with all things gay is just projection. and now -you- are looking for gay men in my area for me. are you hoping to get a photo shoot out of this hook up?

i know you're a bitter old man with big ears and pock marks (and no, the ladies don't think they add 'character'.) and what's up with the lame ass arthur fonzarelli leather jacket?

 

[Ekserb]

there's these things on your weak-ass-made-by-a-free-program site called 'thumbnails.' thumbnails are little preview photos of the larger photos you see when clicking on the 'thumbnails.'

again, -your- fascination with all things gay is just projection. and now -you- are looking for gay men in my area for me. are you hoping to get a photo shoot out of this hook up?

i know you're a bitter old man with big ears and pock marks (and no, the ladies don't think they add 'character'.) and what's up with the lame ass arthur fonzarelli leather jacket?

Yes, the thumbnails are there, but you can't see the watermark in those. Again, I'll have to repost your exact wording:

... and what i notice first when looking at all of your photos is your stupid ass signature....

Based on this quote, I have to assume you clicked on the photos to see the watermarked full-sized images.

But let's say you didn't. Let's say you looked only at the thumbnails on the first page of the gallery. That's still fifteen photos and only two of them are skimmers and another is a self portrait. Yet these three images are what catches your eye. (Well, those three and the main photo on the front page of my web site. That's four.)

Abandon this denial and embrace your homosexuality. You'll be happier! (I found you a paper on the Oxford Journals website that deals with "Internalized homophobia and health issues affecting lesbians and gay men." It's a really dry read, but you may find it interesting and helpful.)

I have no idea why you would say I'm projecting anything onto you when you have now also made clear that you've studied the texture not only of my penis, but also my face. And you've recognized my choices of clothing (though what was worn in the popular 70's sitcom was not the same style jacket that I own).

By the way, posting inline the image of Henry Winkler is also a violation of the forum rules. You really ought to read them before you post anything else. Wouldn't want to get banned from the site, you know.

 

[AutoDelux]

your mug is on the first page of your craptastic site. really don't have to go much farther than that, did i? i'm glad you are doing all this research on all things gay. why is this such a hot button for you? this site is all about exploring sexuality, right. i have found a more appropriate part of the forum for you to post in. try here. these people will not judge you. they may laugh at your obamaesque ears, your wardrobe or your piss-poor website, but not about your being a closeted homosexual.

enjoy!

 

[Ekserb]

your mug is on the first page of your craptastic site. really don't have to go much farther than that, did i? i'm glad you are doing all this research on all things gay. why is this such a hot button for you? this site is all about exploring sexuality, right. i have found a more appropriate part of the forum for you to post in. try here. these people will not judge you. they may laugh at your obamaesque ears, your wardrobe or your piss-poor website, but not about your being a closeted homosexual.

enjoy!

My ears, too? Wow.

Wait, are you now saying President Obama turns you on? Maybe you are heeding my advice!

yes, i'm gay, fat and bald yet still a better person than you.

I've neither seen nor read anything to disprove the first part of your statement, and you've provided no evidence of the second part.