Loverskitten
I bite
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2011
- Posts
- 2,186
Asshat: Hi, I'm Jim, Care to chat?
ImagineMe2: No...
How is this asshatty? Maybe you should turn off PMs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Asshat: Hi, I'm Jim, Care to chat?
ImagineMe2: No...
How is this asshatty? Maybe you should turn off PMs
I wouldn't be in favor of that. There are some very worthwhile people who lurk here but seldom or never post.i wish laurel & manu would disable PMing for those < [x] posts or something.
ed
As someone who has spoken to, and ignored, her... I have to agree with you.
Still boring and ignorant. It is asshatttery if that is the first and only contact with/from the asshat. If it feels like asshattery it is.
You have issues then.
What "Jim" said, is something I would expect a stranger at a bar to say. He introduced himself and asked if you care to chat.
So what, you don't. You said "no" and he didn't write back. The end.
But noooooo you take the time to copy/paste here? Really?
I wouldn't be in favor of that. There are some very worthwhile people who lurk here but seldom or never post.
honestly blase, i don't know of any myself. if you say they exist, OK, but frankly, if they can't be bothered to post i can't be bothered to care. i'm worthwhile lurker-agnostic, i guess you could say.blase quoth:
i wouldn't be in favor of that. there are some very worthwhile people who lurk here but seldom or never post.
although this wasn't addressed to me, it does not change mine.imagineme2 quoth:
he didn't introduce himself, this was the first and only thing he said.
does that change your thinking?
honestly blase, i don't know of any myself. if you say they exist, OK, but frankly, if they can't be bothered to post i can't be bothered to care. i'm worthwhile lurker-agnostic, i guess you could say.
although this wasn't addressed to me, it does not change mine.
i'm curious: to your way of thinking, what is a superior way of introducing himself? cuz unless there's some kind of relevant unspecified context, that certainly looks like an introduction to me.
ed
It would have been better received if he would have introduced himself ahead of time, 5 or 6 word grunts are never appreciated.
You mean desperately chase after you in the playground threads before sending a message?
Nah... It's funny to watch you whine about ol' Jim and say hateful things about me. You really get bent out of shape if you get told no.Feel free to ignore me.
Nah... It's funny to watch you whine about ol' Jim and say hateful things about me. You really get bent out of shape if you get told no.
Feel free to ignore me.
You aren't smart enough to bother me, don't flatter yourself.
You sure about that? You seem to have contradicted yourself.
I think all that Uric Acid is affecting your comprehension, do go away.
Somehow you fail to understand the few words of my post:
He didn't introduce himself, this was the first and only thing he said.
Does that change your thinking?
Nope. I still think you have issues.
Originally Posted by ImagineMe2
Asshat: Hi, I'm Jim, Care to chat?
ImagineMe2: No...
What do you consider an introduction?
Clearly he told me his name, nothing about himself. I don't consider us as introduced. Not sure what your issue with me is but you seem to be persistently upset for some reason.
Her said:You are pathetic with your signature picture hitting a women.
I'm mostly just putting this here because the irony of it makes me laugh.
I had a different pic before, by the way. It wasn't in relation to this one.
But, for someone to complain about the PM's she gets and then turn around and send PMs like this is, as I said, ironic.
Good day, all.
You're right, it's pretty ironic. And if the pic was portraying spanking or other consensual impact play, then her comment was ignorant, as well.
I do have to admit your current animated GIF is large and fast-cycling enough to make it extremely difficult for me to read what you've written. I don't usually feel the need to Adblock images here, but I'm going to have to block your sig pic just to read your future posts. I'd imagine if it's that distracting to me, it's highly likely to fall somewhere between very bothersome and downright dangerous for folks with conditions like epilepsy. There are quite a few folks with neurological and visual issues who frequent this site, BTW.
Of course it's your prerogative, but you may want to consider how both the content and style of images could affect other members when you're selecting them. Typically, it's best to err on the side of small, static and tasteful if you want others to focus on your words vs. your sig or avatar. Larger images and long sigs often make it difficult for those who have smaller screens to browse threads, as well. Just something to think about.