P
pinkhighlighter
Guest
I can barely even watch porn anymore. For the most part, it got boring and repetitive.
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which is why slow, seductive amateur porn is preferable.... xvideos has a lot of the variety you want, or need...U hit it on the head...as well as raising the topic of my BIGGEST pet peeve about porn..the obvious fake obnoxious overacting..omg it's so bad I usually turn the volume all the way down or it's just useless
Yup..tyWhich is why slow, seductive amateur porn is preferable.... xvideos has a lot of the variety you want, or need...
decL
Hi likitiin the tags page. what i mean is porn has covered every aspect, position, person, group, fetish, animal, kink, food, cage...you name it porn has now done it. if there's any taboo act left not sure what it'd be or who would do it but someone would. what's left for the mind to explore when you've seen it all?
I want to do a Hooker Movie fest consisting of "Belle De Jour," "Unforgiven," and this:Oh yes .... "Belle de jour" is fantastic
In the 70s and 80s they made efforts to have real stories for a “solid” 1.5 hours!Porn needs female directors and producers. Miss the seductions of the older videos, which had more "story" and better pacing. Also, love to see older women with more natural bodies and who have more "take charge" libidos.
The Yanks and Ersties videos are supposedly produced and directed by women, and their stuff is a notch or two above the average.Porn needs female directors and producers. Miss the seductions of the older videos, which had more "story" and better pacing. Also, love to see older women with more natural bodies and who have more "take charge" libidos.
Some years ago my first wife and I got far more enjoyment from a couple of series of films made by female directors, as I recall we watched them on Red Hot Dutch. Some of those didn't even show penetration, but were extremely erotic.Porn needs female directors and producers. Miss the seductions of the older videos, which had more "story" and better pacing. Also, love to see older women with more natural bodies and who have more "take charge" libidos.
It makes me think of Rule 34. Apparently this states if it exists there will be porn of it, no exceptions. AI makes it even easier to generate it.in the tags page. what i mean is porn has covered every aspect, position, person, group, fetish, animal, kink, food, cage...you name it porn has now done it. if there's any taboo act left not sure what it'd be or who would do it but someone would. what's left for the mind to explore when you've seen it all?
Facial expression is one of the criteria I select porn for. Those who look like they are having fun and enjoying the moment get further look. Those who look like zombies or look bored or scared do not. It is true that many of the porn houses seem to over emphasize large boobs and shaved pussy but that is not exclusively what they offer. There are plenty of pictures that do have all the things that appeal to me. But I have to look for them. I filter my searches with "trimmed" or "hairy" or whatever I like and that helps narrow the search. There were not nearly so many different porn models and pictures in the 60s and 70s as there are on line today. Yes, there are some girls with hot bods that I wish had pussy hair or at least a happy, come on look on her face and in her eyes. But I pass on them and keep looking. The images you want are out there. It's just a matter of sorting through the crap to find the good ones.Yeah I know. To each his/her own and whats erotic to one person can often be vulgar to another and vice versa. What ever gets through the night. (It's alright, it's alright) But please hear me out and I don't mean to sound like an old geezer. It's important to note that I am only speaking of pictures. I will address videos in seperate thread.
For me, the more natural look of the ladies in the 60s and 70s was much more erotic that those of today. Of course there are exceptions but the ladies of the 60s and 70s knew how to pose for the camera. The expressions on their faces was more a mixture of seduction and playfullness with a hint of innocence. It's as if they are trying to seduce you. And they were not surgically enhanced.
There is a phoniness to alot of the pictues I see online, here and elsewhere, that just doesn't do it for me. If I want to get off looking at pictures I will look and the ones from the 60s and 70s and into the 80s. I miss the curves. I miss the tanlines. Today, the models are mostly tatted up ( I absolutely hate tatoos), oiled down, often silicone enhanced ,and posed spread eagled to show you their shaved pussy. Not that I have anything against a shaved pussy, but there is certain naturalness of an unshaved but well trimmed one. Modern models do not use playful expressions. The vibe they give off is a simple basic "let's fuck" attitude. It's rare that they are photo shot with soft light. The backgrounds usually stark and barren.
I hope I am not alone in feeling this way. It would be a shame if I was.
I'm with you. And, btw, you have great taste.My sense is that, when using the term 'porn', people are thinking of/referring to videos. I find that still pictures and GIF's provide much more stimulation than videos. I look for imagery that I consider to be 'erotica' instead of 'porn. That may be a distinction without a difference, but it works for me. Also, there are erotic stories such as Literotica offers and I almost invariably include them in my concupiscent activities.
I live in a state where the major video sources are not available anyway. But several image hosting sites are available and I make the most of them.
The infamous Rule 34: "If it exists then there will be porn about it, no exceptions."in the tags page. what i mean is porn has covered every aspect, position, person, group, fetish, animal, kink, food, cage...you name it porn has now done it. if there's any taboo act left not sure what it'd be or who would do it but someone would. what's left for the mind to explore when you've seen it all?